<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19602/Mandriva_Linux_2008_Spring_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:01:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>and screenies</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308886</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308886</guid>
			<description>can be found here: <a href="http://www.thecodingstudio.com/opensource/linux/screenshots/index.php?linux_distribution_sm=Mandriva%202008.1" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecodingstudio.com/opensource/linux/screenshots/index.p...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lqsh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Curious distribution selections</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308891</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308891</guid>
			<description>I understand that the DVD has more room, so there are packages on it that can't fit on the CDs.  But I wonder why there are packages on the CDs that aren't on the DVD.<br />
<br />
Here are some of the packages on the free CDs that aren't on the free DVD:<br />
 - bison<br />
 - dia<br />
 - dump<br />
 - gif2png<br />
 - icewm<br />
 - minicom<br />
 - openoffice.org-help-*<br />
 - openssh-askpass</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 19:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KenJackson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Which ONE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308902</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308902</guid>
			<description>Which ONE edition would be right for a newbie? What-oriented is Mandriva? GNOME or KDE? Also, do I download i18n, int or asia?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sumone)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Which ONE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308905</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308905</guid>
			<description>It depends.  If you are a Windows-oriented user, I would usually recommend the KDE version, but the Gnome version is also quite easy to use.  Since it is a liveCD, you can just boot off the disc and take a look without affecting your system whatsoever.<br />
<br />
There should be an iso file without the i18n, asia, or int suffixes, which would be for native English speakers.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 21:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Flatline)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Which ONE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308909</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308909</guid>
			<description>I haven't tried Mandriva lately, but the last time I did they actually seemed to do a good job of providing a decent experience between either GNOME or KDE.  They have been known as more of a KDE distribution though if you really want to know.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 22:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hands)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Which ONE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308914</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308914</guid>
			<description>you would want the int version.<br />
Get either KDE or GNOME. Both are easy to use and should get you started off.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gireesh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Correction..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308915</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308915</guid>
			<description>The version of KDE4 included in this release is KDE4.0.3.<br />
See <a href="http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2008.1_Tour#KDE_3.5.9_and_4.0.3" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2008.1_Tour#KDE_3.5.9_and_4.0.3</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (gireesh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Which ONE?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?308916</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?308916</guid>
			<description>See your language here<br />
<br />
<a href="http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2008.1#Managing_Languages_in_Mandriva_Linux" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/2008.1#Managing_Languages_in_Mandriva_L...</a> <br />
<br />
to choose the right iso image of Mandriva One.<br />
<br />
I prefer KDE and Mandriva is known as one of the best KDE-centric distributions but in the last versions they are offering a very good Gnome implementation.<br />
<br />
And if you download the Free edition you will have both KDE and Gnome packages in the same media (DVD or 3 CDROMs). You can use ou experiment both and decide which you prefer.<br />
<br />
This version is very good. I installed today in one notebook and all was detected and installed without troubles.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 00:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shiva)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309016</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309016</guid>
			<description>Thanks everyone for replying.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sumone)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pretty, and damn good</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309032</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309032</guid>
			<description>Not long installed this on my new toshiba p200-1ee. It's my first, 'out-of-the-box' install on such a relatively modern piece of kit. Even the Chicony web cam works (which seemed doubtful at the time I bought the lappy around three months ago - a bit of desk research then threw up only tentative signs of hope). The Vista import tool works quickly and for me without problems. This is one seriously well-honed distribution for the eternal noobs out there like me who are geeks of the heart, rather than the intellect ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (orfanum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Congratulations</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309130</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309130</guid>
			<description>Looks like another sweet release!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 08:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reinouts)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Popular</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309157</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309157</guid>
			<description>This looks like a popular release.  <br />
<br />
I chose to download the free DVD via bittorrent.  It has been running for a day and a half now using most of my 256KB/s upload capacity.  I have downloaded the whole 4.3GB but have uploaded 6.5 times that much.  So far.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 12:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KenJackson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Some packages</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309345</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309345</guid>
			<description>I had problems with some packages in Beta 1:<br />
- audacity didn't work (slow record or no input recognition)<br />
- Blender didn't start due to some problem in libav51.so or similar<br />
Have these been solved?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (minthaka)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Some packages</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309361</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309361</guid>
			<description>If you want to know that, simply check the status of the bugs you filed for those problems. <br />
<br />
You did file bugs, didn't you?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Apr 2008 01:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reinouts)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
