<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19613/Interview_Gordon_Moore</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:22:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Details</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?309145</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?309145</guid>
			<description>Well, not exactly every year, unless maybe at the very beginning.<br />
<br />
There are many values for that doubling delay, sometimes it is 18 months, sometimes it is 24 months. Often, any exponential raise in computer science is -wrongly- labeled as Moore's law (which deals with the number of transistors).<br />
<br />
My tweaked law would be 'the delay for the doubling time in the Moore law doubles every 10 years', eventually ending to an asymptotical maximum.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 11:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Treza)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Details</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?309226</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?309226</guid>
			<description>Interesting. That makes the number of transistors on a chip:<br />
<br />
2^((2^(x/10))*x)<br />
<br />
which grows VERY quickly, but only approaches infinity as x approaches infinity. I knew I studied maths for a reason.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Michael)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Details</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?309323</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?309323</guid>
			<description>Yuck you're right, in my formula the sky is the limit, and I don't believe that's right.<br />
<br />
Due to the global situation of the XXI century, that curb may even decrease.<br />
There are numerous example in history of forgotten technologies and retrograde technological evolutions.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Treza)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

