<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19642/Atheros_Hires_ath5k_Developer</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:00:04 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I can't wait</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309983</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309983</guid>
			<description>Title says it all, I have to go through all sorts of gyrations to get my cheap Atheros-based nic to behave nicely with some Linux distros</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bosco_bearbank)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>would have been cheaper</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309989</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309989</guid>
			<description>for them to release the chipset specs beforehand than not and now have to employ someone to bump up their credits.<br />
I only hope it won't benefit <i>only</i> to Linux (GPL...).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mmu_man)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Oliver</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?309999</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?309999</guid>
			<description>&gt;Atheros Hires ath5k Developer<br />
<br />
Well well, just a minor detail it's a port of the original OpenBSD driver.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 23:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Oliver)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>eeepc et al.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?310004</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?310004</guid>
			<description>This probably has something to do with the success of the eeepc and all of its clones.  Atheros is probably seeing the benefit of having drivers in the kernel as mini notebooks with GNU/Linux get more popular.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jmcnaught)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: eeepc et al.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?310010</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?310010</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">This probably has something to do with the success of the eeepc and all of its clones.  Atheros is probably seeing the benefit of having drivers in the kernel as mini notebooks with GNU/Linux get more popular. </div><br />
<br />
There is a whole new class of machine opening up.<br />
<br />
Microsoft have come up with a new term to describe them: &quot;Ultra low cost PCs&quot; or ULCPCs. Microsoft have even extended the life of XP Home to try to cater for this market ... because each and every manufacturer is offering a Linux option on their ULCPC.<br />
<br />
There are at least six manufacturers who have a machine lined up for this market ... the EEEPC and the XO OLPC laptops were just the beginning.<br />
<br />
Since they all run Linux, and they all have wireless connectivity ... this amounts to literally millions of machines that will require a wireless chip this year which must have a Linux driver. ASUS alone expects to sell 6 million machines ... even if over 50% of those have Windows installed on delivery ... they will still be the same machine in hardware terms as the ones which have Linux installed ... so all 6 million units must have a wireless chip that has a Linux driver available for it.<br />
<br />
That is just one manufacturer. So we are talking sales here of perhaps 20 million units a year for any manufacturer of a decent, low cost wireless chip which has a good Linux driver.<br />
<br />
Not to be sneezed at.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 02:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lemur2)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This is good news</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?310025</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?310025</guid>
			<description>I am happy to hear this.  The ath5k driver saved me from having to use ndiswrapper on my HP laptop.  I look forward to this support being available in the stock kernel.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jaypee)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: would have been cheaper</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?310126</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?310126</guid>
			<description>I hear ya. Seems unnecessary to hire that guy if they would have just made the documentation available. If the docs were available then everyone would have benefited. Everyone being the BSD camp, Linux camp, Solaris camp, and others.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bsd_geek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: This is good news</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?310209</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?310209</guid>
			<description>Same thing with my ACER laptop.  It has this chipset too, one of the newer ones and never works properly with WiFi so I use wired LAN most of the time I am home.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 02:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siimo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
