<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19794/KDE_4_1_Beta_1_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 15:42:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>KDE rocks!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315808</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315808</guid>
			<description>Congratulations KDE people, and thanks for making KDE4 the best DE ever <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (diegoviola)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315819</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315819</guid>
			<description>i'm testing kde daily; i've rebuilt SVN every 3 days since 3.96 (kde4 betas), and let me tell you...<br />
<br />
IT IS A MESS!!!<br />
<br />
gladly it is growing fast...<br />
it will be ready for joe user until 4.2<br />
for kde users it is a good release...<br />
<br />
congrats kde team!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 18:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (enzobelmont)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315823</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315823</guid>
			<description>Ah, so it's not 4.1, it's 4.2 now that will be the real KDE4 huh? <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
To be honest, it still looks very unpolished in a lot of spots.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sappyvcv)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315825</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315825</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">i'm testing kde daily; i've rebuilt SVN every 3 days since 3.96 (kde4 betas), and let me tell you...<br />
<br />
IT IS A MESS!!! </div><br />
<br />
Works nicely for me.  Can you elaborate what exactly you think is a mess?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (leos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315826</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315826</guid>
			<description>Which spots are those?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zizban)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315827</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315827</guid>
			<description>what's a mess in kde 4.1? even if we are in hard feauture freeze mode it's still a beta, if you are talking about plasma, just wait a bit more since there was a lot of mess because of the WoC(Widget on Canvas) porting, if you have any questions come to #kde-devel on freenode</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Verunks)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315828</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315828</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Ah, so it's not 4.1, it's 4.2 now that will be the real KDE4 huh? </div><br />
Stated nore generally, it will be the real KDE4 at &quot;4.(x+1)&quot;. ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>When Qt4.4 in Debian syncs with Qt-Copy </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315829</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315829</guid>
			<description>I'll then take a look at it.<br />
<br />
Note: I'm not referring to Debian Experimental. Building against KDE Trunk should by now be just using Qt 4.4.Edited 2008-05-27 20:01 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 19:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tyrione)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315837</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315837</guid>
			<description>1.- Plasma (it is a chaos)<br />
2.- Konqueror (as file manager.... and as web browser)<br />
<br />
<br />
i'm using it on my gentoo machine.<br />
<br />
i'm not whinning about it; i know its a work in  progress, i'm just remarking plasma (the MAIN FACE of kde4) as a mess.<br />
<br />
If plasma crashes very often then joe user will feel Whole kde as a weak and unpolished DE.<br />
i do not want to be missunderstood; i love kde4, but sometimes building it make feel, anxious!<br />
<br />
sorry my english.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 20:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (enzobelmont)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315851</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315851</guid>
			<description>ad 1) I think it <i>was</i> a mess lately, especially because of the introduction of WoC, but <i>now</i> with the latest Revisions I'm positively surprised. I could actually use it --&gt; if I could compile it on my main PC, on a different where I test stuff it works.<br />
<br />
ad 2) I guess you would have to elaborate that more. Do you mean websites with Java-Apps, Java Script, Flash, websites heavily using CSS X (where  X is the version number) or just &quot;normal&quot; websites.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 22:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mat69)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315856</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315856</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">1.- Plasma (it is a chaos) </div><br />
<br />
Yeah I guess after the WOC changes it was very unstable.  I think its getting better quickly though.  I use the debian packages so I don't see all the mess <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">2.- Konqueror (as file manager.... and as web browser) </div><br />
<br />
Yeah I stopped using Konqueror entirely in KDE 4.  I like Dolphin so much more as a file manager, and as a web browser I use Firefox 3 now, which is quite good.  Another possibility for the future is Aurora for Webkit goodness (<a href="http://code.google.com/p/arora/" rel="nofollow">http://code.google.com/p/arora/</a>)<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">If plasma crashes very often then joe user will feel Whole kde as a weak and unpolished DE. </div><br />
<br />
Yes.  I don't think this will happen in the released version...   <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 23:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (leos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315864</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315864</guid>
			<description>I think if you're building against the SVN daily, you forfeit the right to complain about stability.<br />
<br />
EDIT: typoEdited 2008-05-28 00:14 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rexstuff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not feeling it...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315895</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315895</guid>
			<description>I started using KDE when I first began using Linux six years ago.  A couple years ago I switched over to Gnome when I started dabbling with Fedora &amp; Ubuntu and have preferred the Gnome desktop experience ever since.  Don't get me wrong, there was nothing wrong with KDE and in fact, as a power user, I really appreciated all that it offered to the user.  I think KDE 3.5.9 represents a great desktop environment.  I can't put my finger on it, but there's something about the new KDE 4 that I just don't like.  Maybe it's the uber-sized desktop icons, the ugly configuration screenlet in the upper corner, or the vastly limited kicker (or plasma...whatever they're calling it).  I just don't like it...yet.  I'm going to keep an eye on it and perhaps try it again when it reaches 4.2 or 4.3.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 04:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cmost)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not feeling it...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315899</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315899</guid>
			<description>I think I kind'a understand what you mean with the 'I can't put my finger on it' (even though I don't feel the same about it). KDE 4 is pretty different from KDE 3, mostly it's feel. At first, when trying, it feels rather alien. But after a while, I noticed it really grew on me. I didn't really switch to KDE 4.0 due to the many issues it had - but trying it did make me feel less comfortable in KDE 3. There is just something about KDE 4 which makes it feel right. I do have a svn with KDE 4.1, and I'm using it right now - having a hard time going back to safe and stable KDE 3.x just because KDE 4 does some things just too good. But I can't put my finger on it - I just can't say WHAT exactly it is which keeps me from logging into KDE 3. Despite the fact all my files are there, and I have to go through all kinds of 'chmod' stuff to get to my own stuff...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 05:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (superstoned)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not feeling it...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315901</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315901</guid>
			<description>Personally I'm beginning to have opposite feelings. Sure KDE4 may still be beta quality in many aspects, but the more I play with KDE4 and see its huge potential, the more I'm starting to feel that I might switch from Gnome to KDE4. Especially as I don't like all the directions that Gnome development has taken (it is mostly ok, but the goal of extreme simplicity may not always serve users, especially power users best). <br />
<br />
These feelings may have a lot to do with aesthetics only too. For example, as KDE4 likes to use vector graphics it helps a lot in making KDE4 look much cleaner and tidier than KDE3 in my opinion. As to default theming like icons, those things can be easily changed if the user or the distribution (like Kubuntu etc.) so wishes. The underlying technology and potential is what is important, not the decoration on the cake.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (irbis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>All the widdle maggots who vote down</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315902</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315902</guid>
			<description>... when someone points out how screwed up software is really have ego issues.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 06:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tyrione)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315914</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315914</guid>
			<description>Strictly none-scientific, I would say that it looks more polished than ever on Suse after having fiddled with the live CD. Of course I don't build it every 3 days or anything...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Googol)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>KDE 4.1 is looking good! </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315915</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315915</guid>
			<description>I'm a lot more comfortable now with the new menu setup. <br />
They seem to have done a few tweaks here and there, and <br />
it seems much easier to use now. <br />
<br />
The KDE 4.x series is becoming stable very quickly, I've <br />
found. I've had no crashes whatsoever in the last few weeks, so it's looking good! <br />
<br />
The new underlying framework will be a huge help to KDE <br />
in the next few years, and the 4.1 release looks like it'll be awesome! Rock on, KDE!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 07:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (obsidian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315919</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315919</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Which spots are those? </div><br />
<br />
God, I'm starting to throw things around, how the hell can you change the panel size now ? This abomination of the new panel settings has to be a joke.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (l3v1)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315920</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315920</guid>
			<description>it's really easy see this video<br />
<a href="http://www.notmart.org/index.php/Software/Enlarge_your_panel" rel="nofollow">http://www.notmart.org/index.php/Software/Enlarge_your_panel</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 08:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Verunks)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: not so excited!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315921</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315921</guid>
			<description>Thanks !</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 09:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (l3v1)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: When Qt4.4 in Debian syncs with Qt-Copy </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315929</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315929</guid>
			<description>I suggest you reading Debian Qt 4.4 changelogs.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MoDaX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Kontact</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315943</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315943</guid>
			<description>The appearance of Kontact from the screenshot looks kind of &quot;old&quot;.  It doesn't go well with the rest of KDE 4.1...<br />
<br />
Why is that?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 13:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Chatbox)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Kontact</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?315956</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?315956</guid>
			<description>Judging from the scrollbars, they are using the old Plastik theme instead of the new Oxygen one.<br />
<br />
I prefer Polyester to all of the above.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (joekiser)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: All the widdle maggots who vote down</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?316013</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?316013</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">... when someone points out how screwed up software is really have ego issues. </div><br />
<br />
You should see what they'll do to you when you dare to say anything derogatory about Ubuntu.  You'll be whisked off to Guantanamo and water boarded until you recant!!!!!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 21:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cmost)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

