<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19850/Apple_Updates_DTrace_in_Mac_OS_X_10_5_3</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 10:37:17 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>a real developers UNIX</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318176</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318176</guid>
			<description>OS X is shaping up to be a real developers UNIX. With ZFS, full DTRACE, GNU tools, X11 it may become the leading OpenSolaris distribution, beating Project Indiana at its own game! <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: a real developers UNIX</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318190</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318190</guid>
			<description>Solaris is not DTrace or ZFS, let alone GNU or X11 (which don't have anything to do with Sun, let alone solaris)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: a real developers UNIX</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318191</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318191</guid>
			<description>Perhaps you should've turned your sarcasm detector on for that one.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: a real developers UNIX</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318194</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318194</guid>
			<description>Ok, after taking another look i think i just made myself look like an idiot ;-)<br />
<br />
Honestly though, its kind of sad that I just assume something that off the wall to be serious...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Linux port</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318197</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318197</guid>
			<description>I would love to see a Linux port of DTrace. Why hasn't this happened yet? Would it be to hard to port, licensing issues? I had assumed it was licensing issues, but it appears Apple has done it.Edited 2008-06-11 17:57 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 17:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Worloch)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>DTrace is committed to FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318209</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318209</guid>
			<description>Funded by Y!, And yea it rocks</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Arabian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>i'll be pissed</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318223</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318223</guid>
			<description>[sorry, wrong thread, please mod down/remove]Edited 2008-06-11 21:28 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (renhoek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Linux port</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318229</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318229</guid>
			<description>In my opinion, it's a lack of will justified by licensing blather. It's almost always easier to talk about why something can't/shouldn't be done than to just do it.<br />
<br />
Cue someone telling me why it can't/shouldn't be done...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aleventhal)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Linux port</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318241</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318241</guid>
			<description>NIH syndrome?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 22:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Blink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Linux port</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318270</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318270</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I would love to see a Linux port of DTrace. Why hasn't this happened yet? Would it be to hard to port, licensing issues? I had assumed it was licensing issues, but it appears Apple has done it. </div><br />
<br />
Mac OS X and Linux do not have the same license, so saying that Mac OS X (or FreeBSD) has it is not an argument to say there is no problem for linux to get it (from a licensing POV).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 07:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ashigabou)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Linux port</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?318334</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?318334</guid>
			<description>Because of the license issues. It has nothing to do with NIH. <br />
<br />
For Linux there's a different tool: SystemTap. It is an open source project, <a href="http://sourceware.org/systemtap" rel="nofollow">http://sourceware.org/systemtap</a>, started by 'the big guys', but AFAIK it isn't included in any distro by default. The project is a few years old, is actually active ( I checked the git repo ), but I can't tell you what the actual state is...<br />
<br />
Harry</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 20:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DirtyHarry)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
