<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19887/Citrix_to_Provide_Windows_Virtualization_on_iPhone_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 09:48:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Virtualization?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319037</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319037</guid>
			<description>I guess virtualization is a lot stronger word than I would use for such technology...<br />
 <br />
 In any case, it's definitely misleading.<br />
<br />
Edit: Oh, it's worse than I thought: &quot;demonstrate an Apple iPhone running Windows XP&quot; - WTF? these people are cracked if they think Windows is &quot;running&quot; on the iPhone.Edited 2008-06-18 23:05 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319047</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319047</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I guess virtualization is a lot stronger word than I would use for such technology... In any case, it's definitely misleading. Edit: Oh, it's worse than I thought: &quot;demonstrate an Apple iPhone running Windows XP&quot; - WTF? these people are cracked if they think Windows is &quot;running&quot; on the iPhone. </div><br />
<br />
Agree. The title should be changed to say &quot;Citrix to Provide Windows Desktop Remoting on iPhone&quot;. Which goes to show you: Tech reporters are teh suck.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 23:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tomcat)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319048</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319048</guid>
			<description>I hope you're not referring to us. Our newsbit reads correctly to me.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adam S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319064</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319064</guid>
			<description>Actually, I believe your title is inaccurate.  There is no virtualization involved and there is no claim of virtualization in the original article.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 02:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (robcj)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319076</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319076</guid>
			<description>Exactly and Citrix's main technology is not virtualization but rather thin client and Remote Desktop type technology.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (NeoX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319080</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319080</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I hope you're not referring to us. Our newsbit reads correctly to me. </div><br />
<br />
Nevertheless, propagating misleading titles is as much wrong as creating a misleading title. I'd say you should've added a &quot;source claims&quot; or even &quot;misleadingly claims&quot; note at least in the news' description.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (l3v1)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319087</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319087</guid>
			<description>Those who cant do become tech reporters.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 05:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Groan...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319146</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319146</guid>
			<description>What does citrix have to do with virtualization?  Did they introduce a virtualization product while I wasn't looking?  Send that one back to the editor please...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 14:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jsight)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319202</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319202</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I hope you're not referring to us. Our newsbit reads correctly to me. </div><br />
<br />
While you're subtle/dry method of questioning the reporting by ZDnet was not entirely lost on many of us... I guess not everyone can appreciate it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: It's Not Virtualization</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319220</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319220</guid>
			<description>Tomcat,<br />
<br />
This shows you what happens when you buy a company and then rebrand your existing products around the name of the company you bought (Xen).  We call it complete confusion.<br />
<br />
They ported their RDP client, which is good news.  Now if they can get it to work with a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse, the iPhone may become quite attractive as a small &quot;road warrior&quot; platform to get access to some of those corporate apps I need on the road.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mbpark)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Groan...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319224</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319224</guid>
			<description>Yup, you've not been looking for a while then...<br />
Xen Server<br />
Xen Desktop<br />
Xen App</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lustyd)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>O_o</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319226</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319226</guid>
			<description>Oh the horror please stop it! :'-(</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (motang)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RDP client for the iPhone</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?319305</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?319305</guid>
			<description>Does anyone know if there's a native RDP client for the iPhone ?<br />
<br />
If there is then iPhone can remotely run Windows apps off an XP terminal server such as ThinServer XP<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.aikotech.com/thinserver.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aikotech.com/thinserver.htm</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Different)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
