<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19957/Build_a_High_Performance_Telephony_System</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:11:55 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>FreeSWITCH rocks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321050</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321050</guid>
			<description>Let me be the first one to say this:<br />
<br />
FreeSWITCH ROCKS!<br />
<br />
Much better than Asterisk, it's SIP stack is 100% RFC compliant and complete... it does STUN, TCP/UDP, SRTP, etc, they use the Sofia SIP stack.<br />
<br />
Nokia also uses Sofia SIP, another great thing about FreeSWITCH is that it uses PCRE for regular expressions, it has event sockets, it's a soft-switch so it can scale from a PBX to a soft-switch, etc.<br />
<br />
It also has YAML support for writing dialplans now, the rest is XML, etc.<br />
<br />
I highly recommend FreeSWITCH to anyone that is interested in VoIP and telecommunications.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://freeswitch.org/" rel="nofollow">http://freeswitch.org/</a><br />
<br />
FreeSWITCH vs Asterisk<br />
<a href="http://freeswitch.org/node/117" rel="nofollow">http://freeswitch.org/node/117</a><br />
<br />
It's the Apache of VoIP =D</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (asdx24)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: FreeSWITCH rocks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321067</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321067</guid>
			<description>I also forgot to mention that FreeSWITCH does not require any Zaptel for conference.<br />
<br />
Asterisk requires Zaptel for it's timing source in order to do conferencing.<br />
<br />
FreeSWITCH has it's own internal API for timing, and it does soft-based conference just fine.<br />
<br />
It's the best application I ever used for VoIP.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (asdx24)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: FreeSWITCH rocks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321111</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321111</guid>
			<description>Which is entirely irrelevant to a discussion of OpenSER.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 23:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anevilyak)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: FreeSWITCH rocks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321157</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321157</guid>
			<description>Of course that it's relevant.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 05:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (asdx24)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: FreeSWITCH rocks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321208</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321208</guid>
			<description>No it isn't. FreeSwitch is a soft switch, not a SIP router, and regardless, the book being reviewed is about OpenSER, not FreeSwitch. You guys spamming about Freeswitch on any and every article having something to do with VoIP all over the web gets old fast.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 12:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (anevilyak)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
