<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/19994/One_Subpoena_Is_All_It_Takes_to_Reveal_Your_Online_Life</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 04:54:07 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I.P. ?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321901</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321901</guid>
			<description>I have never heard of someone calling IP address an &quot;I.P. address&quot;. It might even be grammatically correct, but it's very unusual.<br />
<br />
DG</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 13:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (trenchsol)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Id like to know...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321909</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321909</guid>
			<description>I'd like to know if there is a list of ISP's track records with cooperating with the RIAA MPAA.<br />
<br />
Like ones that will give it up if they just ask, or ones that will wait for an actual subpoena, or ones that will actually fight and protect the rights of their customers.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Id like to know...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321916</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321916</guid>
			<description>I'll bet that it wont take long before we start to see power users using pseudo-anonymous technologies like I2P, TOR or ANTS networks and the like. Plus encrypted exchanges.<br />
<br />
Which in the end will be counter-productive for the music/movie industries but, unfortunatly, the far more important fight against pedophily networks, drugs and other dangerous organization using the Net.<br />
<br />
All to protect an anchronic physical-media business model that worked only because duplication had a cost, which made every item far rarer than its digital immaterial version.<br />
<br />
Mission accomplished, guys.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 14:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (phoudoin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Id like to know...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321931</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321931</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Which in the end will be counter-productive for the music/movie industries but, unfortunatly, the far more important fight against pedophily networks, drugs and other dangerous organization using the Net. </div><br />
<br />
A lot of those guys dealing with that kind of stuff are pretty dumb and don't know about anonymity.  They use IRC, AOL chat rooms, and usenet.  Now, thanks to the RIAA and MPAA, technology like tor, bittorrent, and others are going to become mainstream and these creapy pedophiles are going to start using it.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Id like to know...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321939</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321939</guid>
			<description>My point, exactly.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (phoudoin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Id like to know...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?321941</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?321941</guid>
			<description>anachronic, sorry.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 15:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (phoudoin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Theft is theft but</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322011</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322011</guid>
			<description>Shame other types of internet crimes don't seem to get investigated. Bunch of crooks out there doing all sorts of bad stuff that need to be behind bars or better.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jefro)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Id like to know...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322018</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322018</guid>
			<description>I think you meant <i>anachronistic</i> actually, in the sense of belonging to another time.<br />
<br />
You're quite right anyway. Though I suspect the effort required to secure oneself would put off the casual user. Tor gets a lot of coverage but never feels like it's about to &quot;take off&quot; and become mainstream.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 22:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Michael)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
