<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20010/Linux_Based_Smartphone_FreeRunner</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:57:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Hopefully this will...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322158</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322158</guid>
			<description>Hopefully this will push the GTK developers to improve their toolkit.  Like the article says, GTK lacks big time. GTK 3 is suppose to solve all that with major changes.  I am a big fan of GTK and GNOME, but I admit, the toolkit is inferior when compared to QT.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 16:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tuaris)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ruby and Qt</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322166</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322166</guid>
			<description>Set those puppies up and Ill be ready to rip on that puppy...I have 10 ready-made pharmacy apps and 2 role playing game apps just dying to get on another mobile device.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hibridmatthias)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Ruby and Qt</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322172</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322172</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Set those puppies up and Ill be ready to rip on that puppy...I have 10 ready-made pharmacy apps and 2 role playing game apps just dying to get on another mobile device. </div><br />
<br />
I assume the pharmacy apps and the role-playing apps are meant to be used together. ;}</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>&amp;quot;still incomplete&amp;quot;</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322173</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322173</guid>
			<description>What exactly does this mean? -&gt; &quot;FreeRunner's software platform is still incomplete&quot;  Which &quot;awwe crap&quot; is going to get me?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (EmptiusBranius)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Maybe decent hardware, but:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322183</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322183</guid>
			<description>what's it worth when the software stack is still lacking the most basic features of a mobile phone? The phone (GTA02) is marketed for &quot;developers&quot;, its predecessor GTA01 was marketed for &quot;hardcore developers&quot;. What does that mean? It means it's still not ready for the end user. It may be a geekish thing to have, but it's NOT a reliable mobile phone.<br />
<br />
So it's great to have an incomplete open source mobile phone, but it's not ready for prime time. If it were I'd buy one instantly.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (deb2006)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Ruby and Qt</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322184</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322184</guid>
			<description>I dont think I can post that stuff here for fear of our government being allowed to spy on me and track me with impunity<br />
Gotta love Bush and his limiting of personal liberties <br />
:-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 18:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hibridmatthias)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Freerunner Qtopia</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322188</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322188</guid>
			<description>You can make your Freerunner more stable and complete by using Qtopia by Trolltech, a Nokia Company on it. Available from <a href="http://qtopia.net" rel="nofollow">http://qtopia.net</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lpotter)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Freerunner Qtopia</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322191</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322191</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">You can make your Freerunner more stable and complete by using Qtopia by Trolltech, a Nokia Company on it. Available from <a href="http://qtopia.net" rel="nofollow">http://qtopia.net</a> </div><br />
You know it already runs qtopia.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (m_abs)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Maybe decent hardware, but:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322202</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322202</guid>
			<description>and from what i understand, its the press, not the company, that have been claiming that the new model is aimed at joe average user...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>aimed at a phone developer?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322227</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322227</guid>
			<description>Is it gunning to be picked up by other phone makers then?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 23:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (matthekc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Maybe decent hardware, but:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322269</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322269</guid>
			<description>The Neo Freerunner present software is suitable for advanced users and devs, but the <i>intent</i> for Freerunner is general consumer.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner</a><br />
<div class="cquote">The FreeRunner can be purchased from the Online Store as of July 3, 2008. Software available on the phone suitable for advanced users and developers but not the average consumer. </div><br />
<div class="cquote">The Neo FreeRunner is a Linux-based touch screen smart phone aimed at general consumer use as well as Linux desktop users and software developers.  </div></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 06:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (olefiver)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Maybe decent hardware, but:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322283</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322283</guid>
			<description>Ok, but what does it MEAN:<br />
- can I make a phone call?<br />
- can I send SMS?<br />
<br />
Hardware is one thing - it's just useless if the software stack is still lacking the most basic features. Don't get me wrong: I'd love to play with the Freerunner. I just cannot afford an expensive toy that isn't able to do the most basic things one expects from such a device.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 07:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (deb2006)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Maybe decent hardware, but:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322304</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322304</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">- can I make a phone call? </div>yes<br />
<div class="cquote">- can I send SMS? </div>yes<br />
<br />
I'm buying the Neo Freerunner, together with 9 others, and one in the group was at a &quot;install party&quot; in Oslo a few days ago with some other group which already have gotten their phones.<br />
They did some testing and this is what works with basic image:<br />
 - make and receive phone calls<br />
 - send and receive sms<br />
 - wifi works after some small tweak(s)<br />
 - nett on PC via the Freerunner (usb)<br />
<br />
They didn't get a fix on GPS, but it was inside...<br />
Bluetooth was not tested.<br />
And on-screen keyboard didn't have norwegian letters.<br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Anyways, it's my understanding that openmoko aims to make Neo Freerunner a phone for Joe consumer, but it's not there <i>yet</i></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (olefiver)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Maybe decent hardware, but:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322360</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322360</guid>
			<description>so give it time. this is unlike nokia and the rest that drop a finished product, and then go on to make the next one and in general wants to avoid having anything more to do with the old one...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
