<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20012/Google_Open-sources_its_Internal_Data_Exchange_Language</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:00:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by Kroc</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322175</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322175</guid>
			<description>This is good stuff. Proper beard-powered engineering.<br />
I looked through the spec and this is built for speed, compactness, portability and compatibility.<br />
<br />
I wonder if a compiler/interpreter can be ported to the web (PHP/JS/Ruby &amp;c.), it would be very interesting to process back-end data-streams on the front-end this way.<br />
<br />
I might try a PHP port myself, PHP does have the necessary binary operators.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322178</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322178</guid>
			<description>We're already downloaded it to have a look at it. Although it's basically 'nothing new', what I really like is the simplicity of the IDL language, the .proto files.<br />
<br />
I wonder if there's a dissector for Wireshark already?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DirtyHarry)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Good but</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322199</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322199</guid>
			<description>i see this as a nice and robust wire protocol. But i wish the steps to produce the classes or instantiate  objects for java could be fewer. it gives a feeling this was prepared for C++ initially. i will give a try anyway.<br />
<br />
There is another protocol and RPC mechanism called Hessian, which is also a binary transfer protocol, and it does not require any external configuration or code generation. It also allows method invocation. However, Hessian suffers from bugs and lack of documentation. if anyone is interested in hessian, can check it here: <br />
<a href="http://hessian.caucho.com/" rel="nofollow">http://hessian.caucho.com/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 20:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ahmetaa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by stestagg</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322209</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322209</guid>
			<description>Please fix the link.  I click on something that says 'Official company blog' and I get taken to PC World.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stestagg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322241</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322241</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">We're already downloaded it to have a look at it. Although it's basically 'nothing new', what I really like is the simplicity of the IDL language, etc </div><br />
 <br />
 You are aware that IDL is, like, 20 years old, right?Edited 2008-07-10 01:31 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 01:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tomcat)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by stestagg</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322265</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322265</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I didnt know PCWorld was the company blog for Google...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: cool</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322267</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322267</guid>
			<description>As I said, 'nothing new'. So yes I'm aware of that. The problem with many IDL's is the complexity. And if you have a company with a bunch of C/C++ developers (like we do) then the Protocol Buffers IDL is attractive and certainly not intimidating.<br />
<br />
Regards Hary</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 05:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DirtyHarry)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What's next?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322427</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322427</guid>
			<description>&gt; Google has prepared a download page that contains protocol buffer compilers for Java, C++ and Python.<br />
<br />
So, Guido (van Rossum) has had a hand in this, somehow?<br />
<br />
If this release is supposed to be a prelude to other future releases, anyone's guess as to what those other releases will be?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 03:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Howie S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
