<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20020/</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 10:31:18 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>wtf?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?322308</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?322308</guid>
			<description>I am sorry, but this article is not for the faint-hearted...<br />
<br />
To quote, it says: &quot;Given that Red Hat bases its Fedora distribution on OpenSUSE&quot;<br />
<br />
!!! Ok... where is that &quot;Given&quot;? Apparently either the author of the article knows squat about Linux, or I am missing something. And I don't think I am.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vasper)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: wtf?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?322311</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?322311</guid>
			<description>Not only does the author know squat about Linux, the page sucks bigtime. I can't read it without selecting the whole text!<br />
<br />
He's writing a lot of bs, although there are a few valid points. I'd skip this review.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Almindor)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Rubbish article</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?322312</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?322312</guid>
			<description>What exactly is the intent of this article?  <br />
<br />
Seriously, it talks about how the installation process is not for the inexperienced and then follows it on by talking about RedHat, Fedora, SCO, and Novell's relationship with Microsoft ...  <br />
<br />
If you haven't read the article then I seriously suggest you don't bother.  Why on Earth does OSNews link to articles like this?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Isolationist)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Must be from another planet</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?322314</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?322314</guid>
			<description>&quot;(I'm also not a big fan of the default partitioning scheme, which has separate root and home partitions; I much prefer a single unified root partition. However, that's more a matter of taste than a real knock against OpenSUSE.)&quot;<br />
<br />
Err ... is it not widely recognised that a separate /home is a GOOD, if not GREAT thing?!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JCooper)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

