<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20021/Java_Theory_and_Practice_Going_Wild_With_Generics_2</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:42:01 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>what about</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?322373</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?322373</guid>
			<description>just don't go to wild :<br />
 * List primitive;<br />
 * List array[];<br />
 * if (T instanceof String) {}<br />
 * function(List.class);<br />
<br />
and i have a lot of other trouble because of the type erasure. so kids, just say no and wait for the proper implementation. java generics are nothing but a fancy way to remove the casting.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (renhoek)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
