<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20206/Using_GNOME_on_a_Small_Screen</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 06:33:58 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>pretty impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327568</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327568</guid>
			<description>near-vanilla gnome works pretty well on a tiny screen.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (spikeb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Excellent piece</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327573</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327573</guid>
			<description>Thank you, Thom, for this eye-opening little article. Very well written and supplemented with screenshots so we can get a good idea of your points. I'm quite impressed.<br />
<br />
I wonder if using Matchbox as an alternative interface in Ubuntu would fare as well -- or better -- on such a small screen. As far as I remember, it's still in the Ubuntu repos.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Morgan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327586</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327586</guid>
			<description>I find that Gnome does a good job of converting high resolution monitors into 800x600 mid-90s monstrosities.  KDE 4 is moving in this direction too and I don't like it.  I don't understand why we have to waste so much screen real estate with crappy widgets.  And here's a case where it actually does matter.  I'm glad you managed to make it work, but I'm honestly surprised, because in the past, I've had trouble making GTK stuff fit on a small screen (my first Linux experience was on 800x600 in late 2004 [old monitor] and half the dialogs wouldn't fit on the screen).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siride)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>not hard</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327587</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327587</guid>
			<description>there are plenty of compact themes around.<br />
<br />
setting fonts to 8 and using a compact theme from gnome look have a pretty good time fitting almost everything on my eee 701.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stabbyjones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gnome on a Freerunner!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327588</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327588</guid>
			<description>Oh please! This is small? Check out this one:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-August/027326.html" rel="nofollow">http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-August/027326.ht...</a> <br />
<br />
2.8&quot; is small! ;-)<br />
<br />
Kind regards,</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ikeX)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Similar to my setup</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327590</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327590</guid>
			<description>This is they way I have my laptop set up, I have a single panel, but instead of the single-icon menu I installed the SLAB menu and I am currently using that.  I heard there is a new version of it in Ibex so I am anxiously waiting for that as it is more similar to what Linux Mint uses. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (motang)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How was Linupus' XFCE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327592</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327592</guid>
			<description>Thom,<br />
  how would you say the XFCE in Linpus was before you Ubuntized the little fellow? Were you able to fit the config dialogs in the small screen?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 21:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (amjith)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327597</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327597</guid>
			<description>That is how a high-DPI screen is supposed to look.  If the font is set to 72pt size, the character cell should be exactly one physical inch.  Not more, not less.<br />
<br />
If you want 6pt fonts, then set the font to 6 or 4 or 2 or whatever you like.<br />
<br />
And yes, I do go around telling old people that they are doing it wrong when they set Vista to 640x480 on their 20&quot; monitor.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zlynx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Just converted my Aspire One to dual-boot</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327598</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327598</guid>
			<description>I went with for the 1GB RAM 120GB HD version, which means my Aspire One came with Windows XP installed. I just finished installing Ubuntu 8.04.1 and the updated madwifi modules. Sound (speaker) works, webcam works, blinking lights work. I don't have an SD card to check out the card readers. My preferred font is Liberation Sans, but I also went with 9pt. Next up: finding a suitable travel case.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 22:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bosco_bearbank)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Gnome on a Freerunner!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327600</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327600</guid>
			<description>now that is EXACTLY what the freerunner needs.<br />
<br />
i can't wait to get paid so i can pick one of those bad boys up.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (stabbyjones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: pretty impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327601</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327601</guid>
			<description>Bugs should be filed for those apps that still take too much space and are not resizable.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (azrael29a)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327606</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327606</guid>
			<description>I think you mean pixel, not character cell. A character cell would be the box containing the entire character.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 02:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (iain.dalton)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327607</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327607</guid>
			<description>It's not the fonts...I can deal with that.  It's the layout of everything else.  It's just so big and you can't do anything about.  I didn't get a high resolution screen so that I can look at the moral equivalent of 800x600.  Other environments let you adjust font sizes and the like so that, if you so choose, you can make it look like 800x600, but Gnome basically decides for you that clearly you want to have terrible use of screen real estate and the only option is to hack the themes yourself.  And that still doesn't fix the problem of apps that waste empty space.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siride)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Keep XP and Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327610</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327610</guid>
			<description>The AspireOne looks solid and has good specs to boot. <br />
<br />
You can always keep Linpus on the Aspire and use a thin client software to run the XP OS<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.aikotech.com/thinserver.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.aikotech.com/thinserver.htm</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 03:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Different)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>X11 Font Hinting Style</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327624</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327624</guid>
			<description>@Thom Holwerda<br />
<br />
I also prefer <b>Trebuchet MS</b> for desktop usage, but default X11 <b>hintstyle</b> (which is set to 3) looks very bad with any font, to make it look really good You need to set <b>hintstyle</b> to 0.<br />
<br />
You may also use <b>Trebuchet MS</b> instead of other ugly fonts such as <b>Arial</b> on web sites using <i>~/.fonts.conf</i> settings.<br />
<br />
Here is the difference between <b>htinstyle</b> 0 and 3:<br />
<a href="http://toya.net.pl/~vermaden/gfx/hintstyle_3.png" rel="nofollow">http://toya.net.pl/~vermaden/gfx/hintstyle_3.png</a><br />
<a href="http://toya.net.pl/~vermaden/gfx/hintstyle_0.png" rel="nofollow">http://toya.net.pl/~vermaden/gfx/hintstyle_0.png</a><br />
<br />
Regards<br />
vermaden</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>tiling wm</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327632</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327632</guid>
			<description>Has anyone tried a tiling wm like awesome or wmii on a netbook? Systems with limited screen real estate always seemed like the most obvious place to use a tiling wm to me. I have been thinking about getting an aspireone, eee 1000h, or msi wind, but am still waiting.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (broken_symlink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: How was Linupus' XFCE</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327634</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327634</guid>
			<description>What Xfce configuration dialogs? By default, you couldn't access any of them <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> .<br />
<br />
Using the terminal, you could run xfce-setting-show, but it didn't fit on the small screen at all.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 09:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327640</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327640</guid>
			<description>Here is what I use on my Ubuntu laptop just right now (screen resolution is 1280x800):<br />
<br />
1. Clearlooks Compact theme for GNOME (google it).<br />
<br />
2. Fonts &quot;Sans&quot; (or &quot;Monospace&quot;) of size of 7.5 points with &quot;best contrast&quot; rendering.<br />
<br />
3. Toolbar buttons - &quot;Icons only&quot; setting.<br />
<br />
The result is more compact than Windows.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (asgard)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: X11 Font Hinting Style</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327642</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327642</guid>
			<description>OT: You might want to change spearator to separator in your screenshot.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (RandomGuy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: tiling wm</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327647</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327647</guid>
			<description>I ran ion at 1024x768 for a year or so and it worked okay. <br />
<br />
Screenshots at 800x600:<br />
Tiled stuff: <a href="http://apex.homelinux.net/img/1.png" rel="nofollow">http://apex.homelinux.net/img/1.png</a><br />
Firefox: <a href="http://apex.homelinux.net/img/2.png" rel="nofollow">http://apex.homelinux.net/img/2.png</a><br />
<br />
It really needs more horizontal space, but netbooks have that.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (6c1452)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: X11 Font Hinting Style</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327649</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327649</guid>
			<description>Thanks for the tip, vermaden, made my fonts just a little better looking. I'm always hunting for better font rendering, so thanks for the tip!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 12:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327656</guid>
			<description>That's exactly what he meant.  You obviously don't want a pixel to be exactly one inch.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siride)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gimp</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327659</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327659</guid>
			<description>Well..  using the gimp on any screen is unpleasant...<br />
<br />
I still can't comprehend how anyone could &quot;design&quot; that interface. It's like two programmers got together and built something without looking at it.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 13:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mrnagrom)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: X11 Font Hinting Style</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327665</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327665</guid>
			<description>It was fixed long time ago mate:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://osnews.com/story/19770" rel="nofollow">http://osnews.com/story/19770</a><br />
<br />
... but thanks <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: X11 Font Hinting Style</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327666</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327666</guid>
			<description>You are welcome.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327667</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327667</guid>
			<description>The Gnome components should be the same size no matter what your screen resolution is.  I agree with the Gnome defaults.  Start out big, that way everyone can read it, then let them make it smaller.<br />
<br />
Get a thin-frame theme, there are several.  Make your task bars smaller.  Set the font sizes smaller.  All of that can be changed.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zlynx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>battery</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327671</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327671</guid>
			<description>Does the default OS have better battery life?  Or, does Ubuntu handle that fine?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (backdoc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327672</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327672</guid>
			<description>There's no way to fix the themes without editing a config file in /usr/share/themes.  There's almost no documentation for theme configuration, or it is well hidden.  You have to use trial and error.  Compare that to KDE or Windows where you can easily control theme settings.  Especially on Windows you can control the sizing of various components.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siride)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: battery</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327674</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327674</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Does the default OS have better battery life? Or, does Ubuntu handle that fine? </div><br />
<br />
I think Ubuntu is slightly worse, but after the battery optimisations as listed in the howto, it ain't all bad.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327675</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327675</guid>
			<description>I didn't mean that you should fix the theme, although I suppose that you could.  It'd be easier to use a theme editor tool.  I know there are some.<br />
<br />
I was suggesting using a different theme entirely, one designed for small sizes.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zlynx)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Gnome is wasteful of screen real estate</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327676</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327676</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It's not the fonts...I can deal with that.  It's the layout of everything else.  It's just so big and you can't do anything about.  I didn't get a high resolution screen so that I can look at the moral equivalent of 800x600.  Other environments let you adjust font sizes and the like so that, if you so choose, you can make it look like 800x600, but Gnome basically decides for you that clearly you want to have terrible use of screen real estate and the only option is to hack the themes yourself.  And that still doesn't fix the problem of apps that waste empty space. </div><br />
<br />
I have no idea what you mean when you say &quot;apps that waste empty space&quot;.  That doesn't mean anything.  Maybe you mean the iconbar in GNOME applications?  No that can't be it, you can turn that off in the Appearance preferences.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 17:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (abraxas)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Customizing Linpus Desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327679</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327679</guid>
			<description><i>My preferred course of action was to 'unlock' the default Linpus installation. While this unlocking process is documented quite well on the AcerAspireOne.com community website, it's not a single process per se; you need to unlock several things, and Acer hasn't exactly made it easy. Somewhere in the process I made a mistake, and before I knew it, I was receiving HAL errors that proved unfixable.</i><br />
<br />
You might want to try this:<br />
<a href="http://www.aspireoneuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&amp;t=1256" rel="nofollow">http://www.aspireoneuser.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=31&amp;t=1256</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (k0ro)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: pretty impressive</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327729</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327729</guid>
			<description>Why should bugs be filed for individual applications? The fault is with the underlying platform because GTK does not have any notion of resolution independence.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 14:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>why bother?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327819</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327819</guid>
			<description>I really don't understand why would anyone bother about touching the linpus once it's possible to make it work in non-restricted (geek) mode. To me, this linpus linux is the best distro i have seen lately : fast (i can't believe how fast it can boot), effective, functional. no need to search google, forums to make fundamental things. a lesson for all the freaks at debian, ubuntu, etc.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 12:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (marcgo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: why bother?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?327881</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?327881</guid>
			<description>The reason it's so good is just because it was optimized for this system - which is because it was sold on it. Any linux system could be that good.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I installed Kubuntu because I use this laptop to demo KDE, and I wanted the latest KDE on it...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 13:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (superstoned)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
