<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20261/MorphOS_2_1_Released_Mac_Mini_Port_Progress</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 04:58:13 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Morphos didn't work for me</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329464</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329464</guid>
			<description>Umf... <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
I tried the Morphos 2.0 CD 1.5 months ago, and it wouldn't work properly on my Pegasos (with ATI Radeon card, 128 MB RAM -- machine sent by the original company directly, i didn't put it together myself). It would load fine, but JUST at the time that it would switch to high-res for the graphical installation screens, the CRT monitor would go out of sync. It's a 1280x1024 85Hz monitor (capable of 1600x1200 at 60 Hz too), and never had such problems with it with any other OS. But Morphos 2.0 just didn't work, and I am not sure if this bug is actually fixed on 2.1 before I invest more time download it and try it.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>If the Mac Mini port</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329482</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329482</guid>
			<description>is more or less finished, why are they just sitting on it like this? Also, if they have something that runs on a Mac Mini G4, I wonder how hard it would be to scale up to either an iMac G4 or a PowerMac G4...</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (madcrow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>ok</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329501</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329501</guid>
			<description>Updeated 2.1 over 2.0 on my efika. Seems to be going ok. I dont plan on registering it tho, way too much money. <br />
<br />
I did have mondo trouble getting it to go at 1680x1050 as it did not like my montiros DDC and had to boot up with the bootmenu option. working good now.<br />
<br />
really feeling the screen redraws with the radeon 9250 128mb 64bit card tho at that res.<br />
<br />
its interesting but not worth the price.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_df_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>eMac</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329505</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329505</guid>
			<description>I have an old eMac I can get my hands on as my brother-in-law doesn't use it anymore. (He finds Vista &quot;Better coz it plays games&quot;!)<br />
<br />
I dunno the spec of it, just that it was the last G4 eMac that Apple produced.<br />
<br />
Any good for MorphOS?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AbuHassan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: eMac</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329506</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329506</guid>
			<description>It seems it could be! <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/emac/stats/emac_1.42.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/emac/stats/emac_1.42.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AbuHassan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: ok</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329511</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329511</guid>
			<description>what's the &quot;bootmenu option&quot;?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 05:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: ok</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329515</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329515</guid>
			<description>New feature of MorphOS 2.x. By pressing F1 or LMB during startup, you'll get into Amiga-like boot menu, where you can change some basic settings.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 07:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (strim)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: ok</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329533</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329533</guid>
			<description>its something like bm or bootmenu they added it in 2.0<br />
<br />
so you can bootlike<br />
<br />
boot hd:0 boot.img rd rds 0 bm</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_df_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Morphos didn't work for me</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329540</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329540</guid>
			<description>Just pack your PegII and ship it to Thom already. Give it to someone who cares and can actually install MOS.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bardopookie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Morphos didn't work for me</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329541</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329541</guid>
			<description>I'd love to have it, but uhm, shipping a large computer to The Netherlands is rather expensive both on the sending (shipping costs) as well as the receiving (import taxes) end.<br />
<br />
Too bad.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 14:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Morphos didn't work for me</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329543</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329543</guid>
			<description>The latest idea is to give it to the local Computer History Museum here in the Silicon Valley. I guess it will have to be Morphos 1.0. It's not my fault if the Morphos guys can't get their monitor detection right.Edited 2008-09-07 15:02 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 15:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Morphos didn't work for me</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329553</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329553</guid>
			<description>Would you donate the machine to a developer if shipping was paid? That would be best for the community.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bardopookie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Morphos didn't work for me</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329554</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329554</guid>
			<description>If CHM won't accept it, then yes.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>MorphOS on Apple Hardware</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329562</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329562</guid>
			<description>If MorphOS could be made to work on Apple Hardware (not just the G4 iMac), I have 3 B&amp;W G3 computers that would love to run a modern OS. I have several Beige G3's that would love it also.<br />
<br />
It's easy on eBay to get G3 and G4 upgrades for those computers if horsepower is a problem. I just haven't bothered since 10.5 and above won't work on them, and it's only a matter of time before PPC 10.4.11 is no longer a supported platform for apps.<br />
<br />
But, this old Apple hardware is at least as good as an Efika board, and the older Pegasos boards.<br />
<br />
I hope someone ports MorphOS to them. I'd buy at least one copy to try it out.<br />
<br />
I'd be willing to commit to buying a copy in advance if it would convince someone to port it.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 19:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mage66)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: MorphOS on Apple Hardware</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329578</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329578</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I agree with that. I've got an iMac G3 DV+ with 1GB of ram I normally run Ubuntu on, but I'd switch to MorphOS in a second if it ran on it.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 23:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JLF65)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: MorphOS on Apple Hardware</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?329601</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?329601</guid>
			<description>What do you mean it won't run on them? Which CPU's are you looking at?<br />
<br />
10.5 runs as long as the G4 is 866 MHz and above.<br />
<br />
There is also a trick that will help.<br />
<br />
Take a drive and put into a Mac (or run it from a FW port) that is within specs. Install 10.5 on the drive, and then put that drive into the slower machine. <br />
<br />
Works every time! Just make sure it isn't too slow, or you will be disappointed.<br />
<br />
No G3's though.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 05:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (melgross)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
