<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20279/The_A-Z_of_Programming_Languages_Lua</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:13:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Lovely read!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330101</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330101</guid>
			<description>Wow, Roberto Ierusalimschy sounds really like a relaxed and contented hacker. I loved this interview.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (boudewijn)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by dindin</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330103</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330103</guid>
			<description><i>I guess that even a GPL-like license would hurt its spread.</i><br />
<br />
This i agree with. We would not have used it (and contributed) if not for the liberal license. But may not be everyone's choice.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dindin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wowza</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330109</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330109</guid>
			<description>Could computer world fit more ads into their site? I don't think i've seen a site where the content is 1/5 the page and 4/5ths is all ads like that. To bad the article is a pretty decent one.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 20:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Linwood)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Wowza</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330125</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330125</guid>
			<description>I hear you. Sites like that ( and Computer World is far from being unique in this regard ) irritate me.<br />
<br />
Try clicking the &quot;Print this story&quot; on the right - it'll<br />
take you to <a href="http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1028768484;fp;;fpid;;pf;1" rel="nofollow">http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;1028768484;fp;;fpid;;p...</a>  which only has a single ad box.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bannor99)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>next version</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330153</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330153</guid>
			<description>Lua is a great binding language, and I'm impressed the lua guys are willing to drop things from the language and streamline it without regards to backcompat between major versions.<br />
<br />
I'd love for 6 to clean up (and i know it will never happen) and use 0 indexing instead of 1 indexeing.<br />
<br />
It also needs a better C api for table manipulation.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_df_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mixed feelings about lua..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330157</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330157</guid>
			<description>On the plus side, it's a very, very fast language. We use it as scripting for game development. The table model makes it incredibly flexible.<br />
On the negative side, there's a couple things I don't like about it. <br />
First, I know you can use fallbacks to make&quot;your own object model&quot; but i think this is a double edged sword, as it requires more hacking and it slows down the language overall. <br />
<br />
Second, I wish it had local scoping by default, not global. I understand that by forcing you to write &quot;local&quot;, the &quot;compiler&quot; can use temporaries/indices instead of strings and run faster overall, but it's still annoying.<br />
<br />
Third, while the ada-like syntax is not that bad, I find that having to be capable at two different kind of syntaxes at the same time (specially when it needs &quot;end&quot;, and more specially having indexing begin at 1) is annoying and I believe based more on an academic decision than practice, where you are actually binding from C.<br />
<br />
Fourth, I find the incremental GC method more difficult to keep track of than using refcounts+cycle collector.<br />
<br />
I have found that &quot;squirrel&quot; as a language, solves most of my shortcomings with lua (being based on it), as it's like a more real-world usage oriented version of it.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reduz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Mixed feelings about lua..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330166</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330166</guid>
			<description>are squirrel performance similar?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sanctus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Mixed feelings about lua..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330169</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330169</guid>
			<description>last time I looked at it, lua was faster than squirrel.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 17:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_df_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>mod_wombat in progress...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330181</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330181</guid>
			<description>I had been really interested in using Lua for web applications a couple years ago, and was disappointed by the lack of a decent Apache 2 module. And the old mod_lua for Apache 1.x was not being maintained.<br />
<br />
Yes, I am aware there is Kepler and a couple other solutions, but I need deployment through Apache for a number of reasons.<br />
<br />
Anyway, I was happy to read that there is a new Apache module in progress: mod_wombat - <a href="http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_wombat/" rel="nofollow">http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/httpd/mod_wombat/</a> <br />
<br />
Here's the developer's website: <a href="http://kasparov.skife.org/blog/src/wombat/" rel="nofollow">http://kasparov.skife.org/blog/src/wombat/</a><br />
<br />
The info is pretty minimal at present, and to read the documentation you have to browse /docs in the source, but it looks like they are approaching it the right way. Here is some more information: <a href="http://luanova.org/category/mod_wombat/" rel="nofollow">http://luanova.org/category/mod_wombat/</a>  and here is a small presentation by the developer: <a href="http://kasparov.skife.org/wombat_ac_us_07.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://kasparov.skife.org/wombat_ac_us_07.pdf</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rycamor)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Debian/kSolaris</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330184</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330184</guid>
			<description>If they like Debian so much and want to use some parts of OpenSolaris, why didn't they just start a Debian/kSolaris project ?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 18:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Mixed feelings about lua..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330198</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330198</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><br />
I have found that &quot;squirrel&quot; as a language, solves most of my shortcomings with lua (being based on it), as it's like a more real-world usage oriented version of it. </div><br />
<br />
oh the irony</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (axel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Debian/kSolaris</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330282</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330282</guid>
			<description>GNU libc port means =&gt; no Zones, no ZFS, no SMF, no anything..</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2008 16:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (erast)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: mod_wombat in progress...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?330316</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?330316</guid>
			<description>I can attest first hand that mod_wombat rocks.<br />
I have made 3 websites with it (<a href="http://netpim.info/" rel="nofollow">http://netpim.info/</a> (an online PIM), <a href="http://mailcatch.com/" rel="nofollow">http://mailcatch.com/</a> (a temporary inbox service) and <a href="http://www.maxiblingbling.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.maxiblingbling.com/</a> (a lottery site, in french) ).<br />
Mod_wombat does indeed rock for web coding, it is light, fast and plain out of the way. While it is still young it is already quite good.<br />
I was using Xavante (from Kepler) before proxied by a front-end apache, but performance was subpar, now with wombat I dont have any problems <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DarkGod)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
