<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20363/Sockstress_a_New_and_Effective_DoS_Attack</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:05:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>New? No one really knows</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332820</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332820</guid>
			<description>Fydoor was explaining the typical DOS attack. Nothing really new with that. He also explained the different ways to selectively target resources to bring down the machine. I don't think that's particularly new either. As they haven't published details, its difficult to tell what, if anything, makes it distinct.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: New? No one really knows</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332822</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332822</guid>
			<description>and it's even harder to asses if it's &quot;most devastating of the bunch.&quot; without knowing jack about it.<br />
But hey, hype sells.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: New? No one really knows</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332904</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332904</guid>
			<description>It's actually very serious.  What makes it new is that it's easy to do and does not take much resources to accomplish the DoS attack.  It is basically a way to get around the problem syn cookies was supposed to fix.  If you want to learn more about it I suggest listening to episode #164 of Security Now.  <a href="http://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.grc.com/securitynow.htm</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 07:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Fahrbot)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: New? No one really knows</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332906</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332906</guid>
			<description>Oh yeah, GRC. A truly reliable source for security information. Gibson would never be caught hyping anything (raw sockets will doom the internet!) out of proportion.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I bet OpenBSD is immune to it</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332910</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332910</guid>
			<description>This sounds like such a simply-structured attack that I wouldn't mind betting that OpenBSD took care of this about five years ago.  <br />
<br />
 Given that apparently all that is required to foil it is to block the offending IP address, pf would look at an &quot;attack&quot; like this and say &quot;come on now, gimme something hard to do....&quot;  <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (obsidian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Google for 3wahas</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332911</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332911</guid>
			<description>There was a tool called 3wahas that does exactly this, and was released many years ago, back in the late 90s if i remember.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 09:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bert64)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: New? No one really knows</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?332919</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?332919</guid>
			<description>Steve is w/o a doubt a kook, but he's also usually correct, even when he drastically overstates things.  An unpopular opinion, I'm aware.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 12:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (zombie process)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

