<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20435/Interview_Fedora_10_s_Better_Startup</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 06:20:12 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>This is all great.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335130</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335130</guid>
			<description>This is all great.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (A.O.K.)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Snip..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335133</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335133</guid>
			<description>The fat X cursor was almost a trademark of XFree/Xorg <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siki_miki)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335134</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335134</guid>
			<description>thanks red hat to support linux<br />
<br />
if we had waiting ubuntu to do this, surely that would take 15 years...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (collinm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335135</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335135</guid>
			<description>Actually, we had to wait another -2 years<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstart" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstart</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>huh?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335137</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335137</guid>
			<description>I actually never have heard people complaining about such problems.<br />
<br />
And even if so. It only happens once....?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sgibofh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335138</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335138</guid>
			<description>thanks to Ubuntu to have created that...<br />
<br />
but you should code more...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (collinm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ok weird</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335139</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335139</guid>
			<description>Editing out test...wish we could delete.Edited 2008-10-27 17:12 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aesiamun)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: thanks</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335143</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335143</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Actually, we had to wait another -2 years<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstart" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upstart</a> </div><br />
<br />
Unfortunately Upstart is still used to boot the system in the same way sysvinit did (no event-based startup used in neither Fedora or Ubuntu).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 18:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (siki_miki)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Kernel mode setting</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335151</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335151</guid>
			<description>Regardless if you want a fancy boot or not: IMHO it is the right thing to give the kernel control about the graphics mode. There are many advantages of this and also of graphics memory organization inside the kernel.<br />
 <br />
 Fedora as a major Linux distribution is heavily pushing this. It helps to push further development in that area, for example support for other graphics hardware as well, perhaps even directly by nvidia. This is much more important than the fancy boot itself.Edited 2008-10-27 20:08 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 20:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ford Prefect)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: huh?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335178</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335178</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I actually never have heard people complaining about such problems.<br />
<br />
And even if so. It only happens once....? </div><br />
<br />
Yes, I haven't heard anyone complaining, especially about desktop machines.  The start up with Ubuntu is so much quicker than Windows that I can't imagine complaining.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
