<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20459/Intel_CEO_Linux_to_Dominate_MIDs</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 00:35:50 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Outdated?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335650</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335650</guid>
			<description>Isn't this old news? According to the article date, it's posted in the end of May this year. I think the market is moving a bit faster than that =)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Forsberg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335652</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335652</guid>
			<description>So where are all the Atom powered MIDs? Apart from some demos on trade shows, I haven't seen any. (Though rumor has it that you can actually buy some in China or Hong Kong.) <br />
<br />
It's funny that Intel has one netbook oriented Atom (N270), which is a big hit as practically all the netbooks use them and netbooks are showing up everywhere, and then they have almost half a dozen of device/MID oriented Atom (Z500-Z540) which seem to be going nowhere.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pxa270)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335656</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335656</guid>
			<description>Here in the states, you can buy an Asus EEE with an Atom, and you can buy an Acer Aspire One with an Atom... and you can buy an MSI Wind with an Atom... and you can buy a Dell Inspiron Mini with an Atom...<br />
 <br />
 and there are more, but maybe I'm misunderstanding your question?<br />
<br />
Edit: Oh, are you not equating MID with Netbook? they're pretty much synonymous in my mind <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2008-10-30 14:56 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335658</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335658</guid>
			<description>Well, they'll all switch to ARM soon anyway, right ?<br />
But it won't really frighten intel, they have ARM licences anyway <img src="/images/emo/grin.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
The world is well made, sometimes...</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mmu_man)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Outdated?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335660</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Isn't this old news? According to the article date, it's posted in the end of May this year. I think the market is moving a bit faster than that =) </div><br />
<br />
Whoops, my bad. Well, it's interesting anyway. Discuss <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335668</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335668</guid>
			<description>you mean go back to ARM? There have been ARM &quot;netbooks&quot; for ages ;P</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335684</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335684</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">you mean go back to ARM? There have been ARM &quot;netbooks&quot; for ages ;P </div><br />
<br />
They'll never go back to ARM.  Sure it might have some efficiency advantages, but x86 has the compatibility knockout.  You can run the same software as on any other computer, and that is invaluable.  Transforms these little MIDs from toys to useful computers for me.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (leos)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Outdated?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335688</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335688</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Whoops, my bad. Well, it's interesting anyway. Discuss <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . </div><br />
<br />
No worries <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
Keep up the good work!</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Forsberg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335689</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335689</guid>
			<description>true, but depending on what OS you are running, CPU arch is irrelevant.<br />
<br />
With a *nix, half the time you just have to recompile.<br />
I get what you mean though <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  I was just joking around.Edited 2008-10-30 17:50 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 17:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Outdated?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335693</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335693</guid>
			<description>I seem to remember that the talk about wireless networks this and that started already with Centrino and went nowhere since.<br />
Actually it got worse.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (klimg)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Where are all the Atom MIDs?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335701</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335701</guid>
			<description>but if you're running linux, who cares about compatibility?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 19:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ari-free)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>some more recent news</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335705</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335705</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/153040/intel_linux.html?tk=rss_news" rel="nofollow">http://www.pcworld.com/article/153040/intel_linux.html?tk=rss_news</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>not...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335723</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335723</guid>
			<description>as long as the hardware companies decide to use custom &quot;distros&quot; from suppliers that are into &quot;tivolizing&quot; the software stack.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Intel panicing?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335894</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335894</guid>
			<description>Well, well...<br />
After Apple says it's going Arm in MIDs and Intel says it's the Arm that slows down the iPhone/Ipod-Touch... Intel says that Linux will dominate MIDs! Ya riiiiiiiiight!<br />
<br />
Intel's been on a rampage of late! They must be in real trouble, just like the conservatives <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
KRR</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (krreagan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
