<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20468/A_Closer_Look_at_Red_Hat_s_Plymouth</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 18:03:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>about time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335885</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335885</guid>
			<description>I am really looking forward to this. seeing all the terminal stuff on boot scares the hell out of users (noob users not us advanced linux folk). the overall feel of linux needs to be more polished, this will help out quite a bit.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Links to previous articles, attribution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335887</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335887</guid>
			<description>I was going to ask that you link to &quot;your&quot; previous articles mentioned in the post (&quot;Back in July we shared...&quot;), but then I realized that you lifted the paragraph from phoronix and the previous articles were written by them. In the future, could you please indicate this in the news item? For example, &quot;Phoronix writes, 'Back in July...'&quot;</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rolozo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Links to previous articles, attribution</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335903</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335903</guid>
			<description>Yes, I forgot to indicate that I was quoting. My bad. I usually do. Will fix it up, next time</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Waste of time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335987</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335987</guid>
			<description>Honestly, Plymouth is not where Linux developers need to be wasting their time.  <br />
<br />
Come on.  I see my system's boot screen for a couple of seconds, once a day.  If it flickers or not, big deal.  <br />
<br />
There are *way* more important parts of the system that need reworking that should have higher priority.  <br />
<br />
Just my $0.02</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 01:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Howie S)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Waste of time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335991</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335991</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Honestly, Plymouth is not where Linux developers need to be wasting their time.  <br />
<br />
Come on.  I see my system's boot screen for a couple of seconds, once a day.  If it flickers or not, big deal.  <br />
<br />
There are *way* more important parts of the system that need reworking that should have higher priority.  <br />
<br />
Just my $0.02 </div><br />
<br />
I agree. But they're trying to target Linux based operating systems at the unwashed masses. The unwashed masses are complete drooling idiots that have no clue about pretty much anything. It is not about improving anything, it is just about looking &quot;cool&quot;.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 02:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (0brad0)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Waste of time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335994</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335994</guid>
			<description>yeah but a lot of linux people are into cool things. Like compiz and themes for example.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ari-free)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Waste of time</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?335995</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?335995</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">yeah but a lot of linux people are into cool things. Like compiz and themes for example. </div><br />
<br />
The unwashed masses are.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 03:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (0brad0)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
