<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20474/Detailing_Device_Stage_Libraries</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 11:12:29 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Libraries a nice suprise</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335899</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335899</guid>
			<description>Device stage is sort of expected since this is a &quot;polish the UI&quot; release, but I had written off libraries as yet another search folder implementation, which I have found useless on every OS I have used it on. I'll reserve final judgement until I can actually play around with them, but this shows alot of promise</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 21:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by unzip</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335912</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335912</guid>
			<description>Great presentation skills. <br />
<br />
Anyway it's been a long time since I've seen something really promising coming from MS. I like the way MS is finally looking back on some things which weren't that great and trying to make things up in the next release of Windows.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2008 22:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (unzip)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>More and more...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335930</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335930</guid>
			<description>and more and more Windows is trying to be like BeOS with the glitz of MacOS X's UI.<br />
<br />
This ain't a bad thing, though.<br />
<br />
The better Windows becomes, the better the competition must become, so go Windows 7! ( hehe )<br />
<br />
--The loon</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 01:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (looncraz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: More and more...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335960</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335960</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">and more and more Windows is trying to be like BeOS with the glitz of MacOS X's UI.<br />
<br />
This ain't a bad thing, though.<br />
<br />
The better Windows becomes, the better the competition must become, so go Windows 7! ( hehe )<br />
<br />
--The loon </div><br />
<br />
I agree, MacOS X already showed that the assumption &quot;eye pleasing graphics + ease of use != system security, versatility, and stability&quot; was flawed and you COULD do better.<br />
<br />
Windows 7 building on top of the great (IMHO) under-the-hood changes Vista pioneered for the desktop Windows OS system, optimizing performance, focusing on usability and UI consistency, will not only be good news for Windows users, but for Linux users too as IMHO will motivate the OSS to leapfrog their competition (and this will be good news for everyone).</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 14:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Panajev)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: More and more...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335973</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335973</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Windows 7 building on top of the great (IMHO) under-the-hood changes Vista pioneered for the desktop Windows OS system, optimizing performance, focusing on usability and UI consistency, will not only be good news for Windows users, but for Linux users too as IMHO will motivate the OSS to leapfrog their competition (and this will be good news for everyone). </div><br />
<br />
In theory, yes. However, to this day, a tagging system like the one that exists in Vista has yet to be integrated in eg. Gnome.<br />
<br />
Nautilus also needs some work if Gnome wants to compete with Windows 7 - this library thing looks really nice.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2008 17:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (chris_dk)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Re: Tagging System</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335996</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335996</guid>
			<description>The Gnome developers are only going to reimplement features that people actually use in Vista and Windows 7. Tags ended off being a bit of a fad, and I don't know anyone who uses them on desktop files. Device Stage could be another one of those features. Multi-touch is likely to be the exception to the rule; I'm sure Gnome will get some multi-touch capabilities before everyone realises that they hate leaving fingerprints on their monitors :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 04:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (3rdalbum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: More and more...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?335997</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?335997</guid>
			<description>&quot;I agree, MacOS X already showed that the assumption &quot;eye pleasing graphics + ease of use != system security, versatility, and stability&quot; was flawed and you COULD do better.&quot;<br />
<br />
OS X can be eye pleasing, yes. Ease of use? I know I will get slammed for this, but that is a personal opinion and subjective. It is a confusing and frustrating UI, unless you have used nothing but OS X.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 05:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DrillSgt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: More and more...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?336004</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?336004</guid>
			<description>You mean, it's confusing and frustrating if you've only ever used Windows -- If you've a wider experience than Windows alone, that includes Unix, Linux, Amiga OS, RISC OS, BeOS and so on, then OS X is not out of place.<br />
<br />
Windows is like Photoshop. It's bad UI to begin with, but you just slog through it until you know it well, and then you're unable to understand anything alternative.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 08:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: More and more...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?336021</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?336021</guid>
			<description>&quot;You mean, it's confusing and frustrating if you've only ever used Windows -- If you've a wider experience than Windows alone, that includes Unix, Linux, Amiga OS, RISC OS, BeOS and so on, then OS X is not out of place.&quot;<br />
<br />
Well, again, that is your opinion and I respect that. I use Linux, Unix, Windows, and even OS X, and have used OS 9 prior to. BeOS never booted an any hardware I had so could never try it out. I still think the OS X UI is a usability nightmare, not that Windows and the like are all that much better depending who is using them.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 15:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DrillSgt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>does not look useful</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?336083</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?336083</guid>
			<description>How is that different from smart folders (with the exception that you have to add folders to libraries manually, which sounds cumbersome)? Another badly copied feature?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 02:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MysterMask)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
