<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20533/RED_Announces_Hardware_from_the_Future</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:33:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>F'n Wild</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337258</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337258</guid>
			<description>I love the marriage of old industrial with modern in this piece of equipment. It wreaks of class and durability. I wish I had a use for it. <br />
 <br />
 I can see this being massive for all types of motion pictures, scientific research and more. These optics have to be put into film use. The still shots will be amazing.<br />
 <br />
 The sports entertainment world will definitely change.Edited 2008-11-13 23:58 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 23:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tyrione)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>(RED)</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337259</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337259</guid>
			<description>The first thing I thought after reading the headline was (RED) movement to help Africa with AIDS [1], pretty bad name for a company imho <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
[1] <a href="http://joinred.com" rel="nofollow">http://joinred.com</a></description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Now all they need to do...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337260</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337260</guid>
			<description>... is port back some yottabyte harddrives from their crazy future world.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 00:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Almafeta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: F'n Wild</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337261</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337261</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">The sports entertainment world will definitely change. </div><br />
If you watch your sport at the local multiplex then maybe. Most of us would consider ourselves lucky to get sports coverage at 720p, never mind 28K!</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Michael)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: (RED)</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337262</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337262</guid>
			<description>Given that RED the camera company was founded a year before RED the AIDS campaign was founded, I don't really think you can blame the camera company.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dagw)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: F'n Wild</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337263</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337263</guid>
			<description>At the local double IMAX, given the resolution of that thing O_O</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (merkoth)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337271</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337271</guid>
			<description>whats this doing on osnews?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 04:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: (RED)</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337272</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337272</guid>
			<description>Didn't checked its found time, I thought it is a younger corp.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vermaden)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337273</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337273</guid>
			<description>It's aggresive marketing. Those guys have already made several overpriced shitty cameras, and sold them by paying Peter Jackson and Soderberg to use them (it's good, Peter Jackson used it!), so it's not strange that they make it to OSNews.<br />
<br />
Although this system is in some sense the way to go in digital imaging, well, RED is like Apple*10^128973 in terms of selling coolness instead of a good product.<br />
<br />
By the way, this is my first comment here, hello everybody.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 06:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Yossarian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337274</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337274</guid>
			<description>well mostly i wondered because it seems to have exactly zero to do with operating system news or close to it...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337275</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337275</guid>
			<description>This is very exciting hardware news, this is literally pushing the envelope. Not unlike other hardware news osnews is posting over time.Edited 2008-11-14 08:10 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337276</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337276</guid>
			<description>and me (and others) have questioned those hardware news items before.<br />
<br />
oh, and thanks for the warning.Edited 2008-11-14 08:11 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hobgoblin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337277</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337277</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">This is very exciting hardware news, this is literally pushing the envelope. </div><br />
<br />
Except that they are still to deliver.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">Not unlike other hardware news osnews is posting over time. </div><br />
<br />
At least the other hardware news matters to more than 3 readers.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">I suggest you read the forum rules again. Very carefully </div><br />
<br />
There's just nothing as imposing as vague threats on a forum, is there?<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">There is a rule for this specific thing. </div><br />
<br />
You mean the rule that says the editors can post whatever lame and irrelevant news they want?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: gotta ask...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?337278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?337278</guid>
			<description>Exactly that one. If you don't like it, take your toys and go home. OSNews must be fun for us too, and this is fun for us. If you don't like it, just skip the thread. It's as easy as that.<br />
  <br />
  Look what both of you did now with your off topic trolling comments. This was a perfectly nice story, people were fascinated about the news, and then you two party poopers came here to tell us what to post and what not to post, destroying the vibe.Edited 2008-11-14 08:30 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 08:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
