<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20726/Jobs_Dispels_Health_Rumours</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:43:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>glad he is well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342376</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342376</guid>
			<description>I'm glad he is well but it shows how intense the media speculation must have been for him to feel he had to reveal such personal details<br />
<br />
To good health and a swift recovery</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adurbe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: glad he is well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342382</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342382</guid>
			<description>Agreed, though I suspect a great deal of 'community speculation' would have added to the decision.<br />
<br />
In the end, as long as he is in good health that is all that matters. The fact that he remains CEO of Apple during his recovery is a brave, but unncessary move.<br />
<br />
I couldn't imagine any decent person who'd want to put his role at Apple above his health.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 19:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What else could they say?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342391</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342391</guid>
			<description>Seriously, given Jobs' obligations to Apple as CEO what else could they do but dispell the &quot;rumors&quot;  and downplay them, regardless of whether they were true or false?<br />
<br />
We've already seen the consequence to Apple's stock when the a fraudulent announcement of his death was reported on a major tech's blogging site, we already know what kind of impact allegations of Jobs' health provoke.<br />
<br />
If Jobs didn't dispute these &quot;rumors&quot; now he'd be sued by all kinds of Apple stockholders!!!<br />
<br />
--bornagainpenguin</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bornagainenguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: glad he is well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342394</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342394</guid>
			<description>to many people steve jobs = apple<br />
<br />
his ill health hit the stock<br />
<a href="http://finance.google.co.uk/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&amp;chdv=1&amp;chvs=maximized&amp;chdeh=0&amp;chdet=1231189727956&amp;chddm=6673&amp;q=NASDAQ:AAPL&amp;ntsp=0" rel="nofollow">http://finance.google.co.uk/finance?chdnp=1&amp;chdd=1&amp;chds=1&a...</a> <br />
<br />
he had to make it clear he was doing well and in charge</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adurbe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: glad he is well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342397</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342397</guid>
			<description>Even so, there are some things in life that are more valuable than money. <br />
<br />
In my view (which I am sure is shared by many people, Mr Jobs included), a person's health is worth a lot more than money, shares or a company's financial position.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Are they telling the truth this time?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342399</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342399</guid>
			<description>Last time they did this, they said Jobs had a &quot;common bug&quot; and flat out lied out about his health. We all know now what was really going on.<br />
<br />
Can we believe them this time?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (pantheraleo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: glad he is well</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342400</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342400</guid>
			<description>oh, I agree entirely with you<br />
<br />
a life must and should be worth more than money</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adurbe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Tomorrow's headline will read:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342422</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342422</guid>
			<description>And in other news, the SEC is looking into allegations that the author of the Gizmodo article snapped up $25k worth of apple stock after its value dropped 12% from jittery investors worried about the impact of Jobs' health, only to dump it for a nice profit after the prices rebounded from the news that the rum rumour was unfounded.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FishB8)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Dispel</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342423</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342423</guid>
			<description>Dispel has one l, not two.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AdamW)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Dispel</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342430</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342430</guid>
			<description>Yes, it does seem that Thom disspelled that word in the story heading. ;-)Edited 2009-01-06 04:21 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Are they telling the truth this time?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?342505</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?342505</guid>
			<description>They've never lied about it, its been the same 'common bug' since he's had surgery, his doctors haven't known what the real issue is until now, he was just slowly losing weight.<br />
 <br />
 First it was never speculated one bit he had cancer until he made the announcement that he was having/just had surgery (since the cancer wasn't terminal or required any treatment that would make him or feel sick).<br />
 <br />
 What he's had for the last few years is apparently a hormone issue which hasn't been properly diagnosed by anyone until recently and he is now starting his treatment.   Had he or his doctors known it was imply a hormone issue the treatment would of started then.Edited 2009-01-06 19:45 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 19:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mckill)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
