<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20797/Building_Desktop_Linux_Applications_with_JavaScript</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 19:12:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>why js?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?344356</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?344356</guid>
			<description><b>it could change the way that GNOME programmers approach application development. JavaScript could be used as high-level glue for user interface manipulation and rapid prototyping while Vala or C are used for performance-sensitive tasks.</b><br />
<br />
so.. nothing python or such couldn't do?<br />
<br />
I personally find javascript hard and messy inc omparison</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_xmv)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: why js?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?344368</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?344368</guid>
			<description>I agree with you.  I believe they are targeting the large base of web and widget/gadget developers who already know JavaScript and just want to write small apps.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fgxh298)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>One word</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?344393</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?344393</guid>
			<description>Plasma<br />
<br />
:)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shiny)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: why js?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?344400</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?344400</guid>
			<description>In its current form, and given the way it's used (clumsily), the tasks it's being used for (mainly manipulating DOM trees) and the platform it's used on (browsers), sure, it's generally a mess.<br />
<br />
However, work on the next version of javascript is ongoing, and promises some *very* compelling features (see for example <a href="http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2504" rel="nofollow">http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2504</a> : highlights for me are optional typing, and support for both nominal and structural types).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (raboof)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: why js?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?344421</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?344421</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I agree with you. I believe they are targeting the large base of web and widget/gadget developers who already know JavaScript and just want to write small apps. </div><br />
 <br />
 Yeah, I think so too. If I could learn one language and use it to build (small) desktop applications as well as web applications, even I would be interested in that. Of course, there's Java, but that's more of a full-blown programming language, whereas I'm thinking more along the lines of a dynamic scripting language. If you could program client-side web stuff with python, that would be the camel's nuts <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2009-01-19 23:27 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 23:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WorknMan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
