<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20889/Sony_s_Profits_Down_95_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 17:49:15 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346449</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346449</guid>
			<description>Finally, Sony's arrogance has caught up with them.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 03:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>gimmicky</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346455</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346455</guid>
			<description>In my mind I often compare Apple to Sony, except that Sony's unique products seem so gimmicky.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lqsh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Typical. Sony's own damn fault.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346456</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346456</guid>
			<description>It's Sony's own damn fault. A product like the PS3 - which should have been a bigger seller - was flawed from the very start. No lessons was learned/copied from the Xbox's earlier introduction. No support for popular codecs. The ability to develop third-party applications (i.e. open) would have had a huge positve impact on sales. But no, as typical of Sony, the product was limited/restricted to the disappointment of many potential buyers.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (tomchr)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346457</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346457</guid>
			<description>The whole markets arrogance is catching up, and not many are going to survive it. Its their own damn fault for ignoring the last year and a half, they should have leaned out at the start of this mess instead of waiting until the bleeding cant be stopped. Sony will survive because of its shear size, but only with changes, its just sad so many people have to lose their jobs because execs care more about their shareholders than the employees that make the company exist.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hollovoid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Excellent</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346468</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346468</guid>
			<description>May Sony's agony be as painful as possible.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (maasox)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Uh. Math?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346470</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346470</guid>
			<description>I'm having trouble grokking the math on this one. If you go from a profit to a loss, you can't sensibly say the profit declined by X%. It's just not mathematically possible to *do* that calculation. You can only say the profit declined by X% if it was, at least, a profit both times.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AdamW)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Uh. Math?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346473</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346473</guid>
			<description>FTFA:<br />
<br />
<i>Sony Corp. said its net profit shriveled to 10.4 billion yen ($115.6 million) in the third quarter from 200.2 billion yen a year earlier.</i><br />
<br />
Maybe that will help your calcs <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 06:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fxer)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Uh. Math?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346479</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346479</guid>
			<description>The summary is weird.  Profit is down for the third quarter compared to the third quarter last year.  The loss is <i>projected</i> for the year in total.  Those two aren't mutually exclusive, though the way they are presented in the summary here doesn't make that clear.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 07:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MamiyaOtaru)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too bad</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346480</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346480</guid>
			<description>Sony products are very good (VAIO, monitors, DVB terminals, earphones, speakers, etc...). I'm sad for the employees too. Let's hope the company recovers quickly.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Liquidator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Too bad</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346481</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346481</guid>
			<description>Exactly, I guess people on these boards think of the PS3 when they think of Sony. While that may have been a bomb, Sony make other products many of which are very good an innovative. Their DSLR range is particularly impressive, especially when you consider that their offerings are all priced below similar cameras from Nikon and Canon.<br />
<br />
It would be interesting to see what Sony does. I hope that they will continue making fantastic cameras.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (evangs)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346490</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346490</guid>
			<description>Well without shareholders the company wouldn't have the capital it needs to expand. It's a two way thing.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 10:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Time to throw a party?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346497</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346497</guid>
			<description>Couldn't have happened to a better company.  I hope they next get a rootkit(virus) that wipes out the remaining 5% profit so as to totally wipe them out, slime of a company they are.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (RawMustard)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Too bad</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346502</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346502</guid>
			<description>Actually PS3 sales and XBox 360 sales where equal this year, with only the XBox 360's price drop keeping it 'in the race'. <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$1264624.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/ps3-and-360-sales-equal-in-2008-$126...</a> <br />
<br />
I guess that means the only console not to bomb was the Wii.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Vargol)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Sony is Like Microsoft</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346504</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346504</guid>
			<description>Ive always found Sony to be like Microsoft, they have some solid products, some very clever people working at the company but the most stupid managers ive come across. I hope doesn't go away anytime soon, just the crap they have amassed such as the idiot spouting rubbish about the PS3 and the rootkit crap.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (REM2000)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Excellent</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346505</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346505</guid>
			<description>Why so much hate? <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Liquidator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346506</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346506</guid>
			<description>Patience is the key... rapid expansion when you dont have a sustainable market to support it is financial suicide. These companies want huge profits every year, when paying off debts, and making sure your spot is going to be there will pay off in the long time. Make sure every hire you approve is absolutely necessary, internally audit every job for usefulness., You may employ less but you will employ longer. I understand shareholders are needed in certain circumstances, but they need to take smaller steps and let the concrete set, and make these people understand slow steady gains are safe in an unsafe market.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 13:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hollovoid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I generally think that...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346520</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346520</guid>
			<description>most of the comments here and the vitriol directed at Sony are warranted. In the 90s Sony was awesome....even in the 80s...but now they are still awesome but it seems they are a bit diluted. They do have stupid managers who are incredibly arrogant and it seems that they do not like acknowledging their mistakes at all. Thats whats hurting the company.<br />
<br />
That said I wish them the best in terms of recovering and hoping that they have learned from their lessons about rootkits, drm, and overpricing their stuff. I do love my PS3 and I do love my 55 inch XBR8 and my Sony receiver, and my PSP.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 18:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (suryad)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Free market (headless chicken) economy</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346532</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346532</guid>
			<description>I like the analogy, and I am not even left wing</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dimosd)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Excellent</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346557</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346557</guid>
			<description>The reason is because Sony is one of the most arrogant companies that exists.  The head of the game division when asked how can they sell the PS3 for so much when it was about to be released and he responded that they could sell rocks in a box for $600 if it was branded Sony.  Ever since they got into producing movies and music they have become one of the worst companies in the world.  The rootkit fiasco.  The deliberate disabling of their hardware so u cant copy anything or get a degraded recording.  The lobbying congress in an attempt to make recording from the radio illegal.  It goes on and on.  The suing of little kids and grandma for supposedly downloading  music.  The lobbying for taxing blank CD Media.  The ripping off of artists. The lobbying for broadcast flag, The lobbying for the DMCA, BlueRay price hike when HD-DVD died, Sony is a horribly draconian company.  I used to own nothing but Sony products and have been personally responsible for recommending and installing over $1,000,000 worth of Sony professional and consumer equipment for several companies and individuals.  I no longer and will never recommend their products to anyone.  The Sony rootkit fiasco was a huge mess for us.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 02:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (andydread)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Excellent</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346561</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346561</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Why so much hate? <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" />  </div><br />
<br />
Back when I did sys admin work I used to purchase Sony laptops for sales people.  I could pick them up locally, and they were reasonably priced at the time.<br />
<br />
Until I called them about a warranty repair on a laptop that was less than 6 months old.  I was informed that they would not honor the warranty since I hadn't filled out the buyer registration card.<br />
<br />
It was the last time I had purchased ANYTHING with the Sony label on it.  If it weren't for a couple of movies I would have boycotted them entirely.  I certainly do everything in my power to point folks to some other, less idiotic alternative for a product.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 04:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Metrol)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: gimmicky</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346564</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346564</guid>
			<description>Atleast with Sony you often get what you pay for. Vendor lockin in both cases though.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 05:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (aliquis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Typical. Sony's own damn fault.</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346627</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346627</guid>
			<description>The major losses were from TV sales. Please RTFA. This isn't Slashdot.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wanderingk88)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Free market (headless chicken) economy</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346628</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346628</guid>
			<description>There's no such thing as a free market in reality--at least not the theory liberal market capitalists want to sell to us.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wanderingk88)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Time to throw a party?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346664</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346664</guid>
			<description>Maybe they can make up for it by installing more craplets on their laptops!</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bm3719)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346849</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346849</guid>
			<description>Ever heard of speculation?<br />
 <br />
 Not everyone likes to wait for 20 years to make money. Actually, no one <b>*wants*</b> to wait. Most of us are forced by our own incertitude and fears to get a day job <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
 <br />
 And, lastly, have you ever heard of hind sight? It's easy to predict things after they have happened <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2009-02-03 09:25 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 09:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (-oblio-)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Comment by flanque</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?346856</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?346856</guid>
			<description>Speculation is OK, as long as you know how much you can risk without tanking the company. You don't have to wait 20 years to make money, the problem is people don't like to wait 20 months, or even days. Most investors are idiots unfortunately, and want everything now, which pushes companies into dangerous situations they otherwise wouldn't agree to. The stock market should encourage long term investments, not hit up whatever is hot and jump on to the next when you've bled it dry, this kind of attitude has made people alot of money... but not nearly as much as it has lost.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (hollovoid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
