<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/20943/Awn_Awn_Extras_0_3_2_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:00:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347884</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347884</guid>
			<description>Here is mine with the latest Avant...<br />
<br />
My  Ubuntu desktop with Avant</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (raver31)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347896</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347896</guid>
			<description>well that confirms it. At least 1 person is using it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Thanks for  the review!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347907</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347907</guid>
			<description>Hi Thom,<br />
<br />
Thanks for reviewing Awn/Awn Extras for us! I'd like to address some of the issues that you brought up.<br />
<br />
To clarify, the FAQ entry you linked to refers to a problem that some people have with task icons. Some applications don't follow the icon theme standards and so their icons may look out of place if you have a substantially different icon theme set.  There is also a similar application-specific problem in which apps don't provide a high-resolution icon for their &quot;app icon&quot;, and so it looks blurry (I'm looking at you, OpenOffice.org).<br />
<br />
Which system tray applet did you try to run? We have two now: Notification Area (not to be confused with the libnotify-related Notification Daemon applet) and PyNot.<br />
<br />
To get rid of the offset, open &quot;Dock Preferences&quot;, click on the &quot;Bar Appearance&quot; tab, and set the icon offset to 0.<br />
<br />
By the way, there is a slight typo: &quot;Avant Windows Navigator&quot; should drop the &quot;s&quot;.<br />
<br />
Thanks again for the publicity!<br />
<br />
-malept (Awn/Awn Extras Developer)</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (malept)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Thanks for  the review!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347908</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347908</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">To clarify, the FAQ entry you linked to refers to a problem that some people have with task icons. Some applications don't follow the icon theme standards and so their icons may look out of place if you have a substantially different icon theme set. There is also a similar application-specific problem in which apps don't provide a high-resolution icon for their &quot;app icon&quot;, and so it looks blurry (I'm looking at you, OpenOffice.org). </div><br />
<br />
Ah, that indeed clarifies a lot. Yeah, I've seen some icons that look weird on the dock.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">Which system tray applet did you try to run? We have two now: Notification Area (not to be confused with the libnotify-related Notification Daemon applet) and PyNot. </div><br />
<br />
Both of them refused to work, but for some weird reason, when I tried it a few hours later, they suddebly did work. A bit odd, but hey, it works now, so I'm happy.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">To get rid of the offset, open &quot;Dock Preferences&quot;, click on the &quot;Bar Appearance&quot; tab, and set the icon offset to 0. </div><br />
<br />
Yes, but I would like to get rid of the reflection, without lowering the icons. Maybe it's a good idea to include a checkbox for this (assuming it's not theme-specific)? Especially if the icons contain text (for instance, the weather applet) the reflected text is a little too sharp, making the actual text hard to read.<br />
<br />
Then again, maybe I'm the only one complaining about this <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 22:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Thanks for  the review!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347920</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347920</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Yes, but I would like to get rid of the reflection, without lowering the icons. Maybe it's a good idea to include a checkbox for this (assuming it's not theme-specific)? Especially if the icons contain text (for instance, the weather applet) the reflected text is a little too sharp, making the actual text hard to read.<br />
<br />
Then again, maybe I'm the only one complaining about this <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . </div><br />
<br />
I have been told that this is indeed part of the configuration, except that it's an advanced option that is only available via GConf. Modify the key /apps/avant-window-navigator/app/reflection_alpha_multiplier  so that it's 0.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (malept)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347935</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347935</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">well that confirms it. At least 1 person is using it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . </div><br />
<br />
I tried the earlier version just last week (I have lousy timing) and put it away.  It's a nice idea, but looks aren't everything.  There is something similar for Windows and it's a pain to use, also.  For me at least, it's as good to go with the GNOME menus.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347936</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347936</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">There is something similar for Windows and it's a pain to use, also. </div><br />
<br />
What, in your opinion, makes Awn a pain to use? This is purely out of curiosity. I'm always trying to make Awn more usable.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 01:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (malept)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347956</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347956</guid>
			<description>Looks like lots of wasted desktop for some eye candy.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 05:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bnolsen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347989</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347989</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Looks like lots of wasted desktop for some eye candy. </div><br />
<br />
I find it actually really quite useful.  Easily the most usable dock like thing to come to Linux as far as I'm concerned.  And with shrinking and auto-hiding it doesn't actually have to take up any desktop space when you're not actually using it.<br />
<br />
However it does use a lot of resources.  It is, for example, slightly too slow for me to use on x41 Thinkpad.  Hopefully they'll be able to optimize some things in future releases.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 11:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dagw)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I like it!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?347999</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?347999</guid>
			<description>I've been using AWN since it first came out (replacing the difficult to configure Kiba-dock) on my desktop.  I like it much better than cairo-dock or the newer GnomeDo dock.  I find AWN to be stable and quite useful in place of a second gnome-panel on the bottom of my screen.  I don't know why people think it wastes space; it takes up precious little room on a larger screen.  AWN even works nicely in KDE 3.5.x on my laptop.  AWN notification daemon is elegant and looks much nicer than Gnome's native notifications with Compiz enabled.  My only real complaint about AWN was the bug in AWN preferences where every launcher had the same icon and name.  Great work!!! I can't wait until the new version makes its way into Debian!!  Keep it coming.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cmost)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?348009</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?348009</guid>
			<description>I find the whole concept of a dock annoying as hell. It has half the functionality of a second taskbar for launching programs and, in the case of OS X, bullshit functionality for task management.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wanderingk88)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?348081</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?348081</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It has half the functionality of a second taskbar for launching programs [...]. </div><br />
Could you please expand upon this?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 18:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (malept)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Do/Docky vs Avant WN</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?348205</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?348205</guid>
			<description>I haven't used neither of these two docks but how does Awn compare to Do/Docky?<br />
<br />
Thom, in your review you mention none of the other docks are as good as this one. Does this include Do/Docky?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (OSGuy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?348217</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?348217</guid>
			<description>I agree, my wording was rather poor. What I meant is: The only functionality a dock has is to launch programs. A second taskbar can have application launchers, menus, system trays, and all sorts of useful stuff. I don't use traditional desktop environments anymore (I've dropped them all for awesome 3, and tiling window managers are just that, awesome), but when I used both GNOME and KDE 3.5, I used to have a top taskbar with a menu, application launchers, a desktop pager, and the system tray, and a bottom taskbar to keep track of open windows and applications.<br />
<br />
Had I swapped the top taskbar for a dock, I'd be missing out on my system tray, my desktop pager and my menus, which would promptly fill up the bottom taskbar and take vital space from the functionality that needs it the most. Granted, that could change a bit with plasma widgets in KDE 4, but still, a dock is not half as useful and versatile as a taskbar, and the latter can achieve much more functionality with 50% less screen real estate.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wanderingk88)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[7]: My desktop</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?348219</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?348219</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Had I swapped the top taskbar for a dock, I'd be missing out on my system tray, my desktop pager and my menus, which would promptly fill up the bottom taskbar and take vital space from the functionality that needs it the most. Granted, that could change a bit with plasma widgets in KDE 4, but still, a dock is not half as useful and versatile as a taskbar, and the latter can achieve much more functionality with 50% less screen real estate. </div><br />
<br />
For what it's worth, Awn's sibling project, Awn Extras, provides system tray, desktop pager, and menu applets (among others). So, if you replace both taskbars with a dock, you wouldn't necessarily lose screen real estate and keep all the functionality you have. Plus, you can change the height of the dock to whatever you want.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 04:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (malept)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>AWN</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?348228</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?348228</guid>
			<description>Ok I just installed AWN and I don't like it. It is because (unless I am mistaken) the most basic desktop integration seems to be missing. <br />
 <br />
 Why can't I drag icons from my desktop to the dock? You should be able to drag icons onto the dock and the dock automatically expands and adds the icons. -- Ubuntu Jaunty --Edited 2009-02-11 08:43 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 08:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (OSGuy)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
