<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21094/RIM_Plans_to_Open_Blackberry_App_Store</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:25:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by Kroc</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?352072</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?352072</guid>
			<description>How long has this been possible? How many years has RIM and all the phone manufacturers and the carriers had a head start on Apple and yet--and yet they *only now* decide that an easy to use app portal is a good idea.<br />
<br />
This is called competition and I hope RIM and the carriers choke on their damn app stores for holding us all back for so many years.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 07:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kroc)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Morin</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?352097</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?352097</guid>
			<description>&gt; While people aren't happy about the decision, it could work to keep the<br />
&gt; clutter down<br />
<br />
The 'clutter' includes many useful applications, and a $0.99 pricing both encourages users to use them and developers to write them. Examples include the ruler, the flashlight, and the periodic table. As a user, paying more than $1 for these applications seems overpriced, and I would start wondering how much I need them instead of just buying them. Developers may start producing such applications for free (as many do now), but then a lot more developers would be encouraged by the fact that (1000 users x $1 x 70% of the payment goes to the developer) = $700 for an application that takes 1 hour to write.<br />
<br />
Simply put, disallowing prices between $0 and $3 just hurts applications that are worth exactly that amount.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 11:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Morin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>$999 Must be one hellova killer app</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?352103</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?352103</guid>
			<description>Maybe I'm being silly but who in their right mind is going to pay $999 for an app that costs a darned sight more than the device itself and one that can so easily get lost or stolen.<br />
<br />
I just wonder many PC apps out there charger $999 for their clients. Not many methinks.<br />
<br />
Nice try RIM but it sure ain't going to beat the iPhone store. $0.99 is a good starting point. At this level you can try something out and not feel to pissed off if it is not really what you want. at $3.00+ this is not so easy to write off.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 14:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (shotsman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: $999 Must be one hellova killer app</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?352116</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?352116</guid>
			<description>Nobody is forcing a developer to price an app at $999. I don't think there are any apps on the Apple App store either that is priced that high. That is just a limit that Apple &amp; RIM figure is high enough to not limit expensive apps.<br />
<br />
Secondly, if the application is linked to an account, if you lost your phone, you would just purchase a new one and download the app again for no additional cost.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 17:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (arpan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Cool!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?352119</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?352119</guid>
			<description>Cool!<br />
[as he holds and looks down at his BlackBerry 8820]</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 18:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (milatchi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
