<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21153/A_Look_at_the_Nokia_N79</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:33:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>camera</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?353630</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?353630</guid>
			<description>While i'm not fond of your test pictures, what i like those phones for is usually the camera.<br />
<br />
I can do really good quality pictures with them, as long as there's enough.<br />
<br />
They're pretty bad in low light condition and have also no setting for exposure duration.<br />
<br />
Eg: N95 picture with he 5MP (last 3 modified in gimp as the link indicates :p):<br />
<br />
 <a href="http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/4719-2/19092007400.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/4719-2/19092007400.jpg</a> <br />
<br />
 <a href="http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/5251-2/28052008626+_Modified+in+GIMP+Image+Editor_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/5251-2/28052008626+_Modified+in+GI...</a> <br />
<br />
 <a href="http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/5227-2/26052008607+_Modified+in+GIMP+Image+Editor_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/5227-2/26052008607+_Modified+in+GI...</a> <br />
<br />
 <a href="http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/5281-2/28052008637+_Modified+in+GIMP+Image+Editor_.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://tibere.tzib.net/gallery/d/5281-2/28052008637+_Modified+in+GI...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_xmv)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: camera</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?353640</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?353640</guid>
			<description>The N95 camera is much better than the N79's. So don't compare apples and oranges. Also evident from my N95 review: <a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/17837/Review_Nokia_N95/page2/" rel="nofollow">http://www.osnews.com/story/17837/Review_Nokia_N95/page2/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Call quality?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?353679</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?353679</guid>
			<description>So... might a phone review be expected to mention something about general signal strength and call quality? Just puttin it out there...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (saynte)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Call quality?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?353734</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?353734</guid>
			<description>I did speak of call quality in the article, and it was indeed excellent.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: camera</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?353783</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?353783</guid>
			<description>i think he means this class of mobile phone vs the iPhone which you mentionned<br />
 the iPhone camera kinda sucks in comparison, being N95 or the phone in question here<br />
 <br />
edit:<br />
<br />
 your test picture isnt exactly a very nice area, the luminosity is very bad which is usually making bad pictures with these cameras<br />
your test pictures for your N95 link had a much better light (maybe its also better quality etc, but anyway, i think that's the point <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> Edited 2009-03-19 01:52 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 01:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jimloo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: camera</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?353795</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?353795</guid>
			<description>Believe it or not, I don't control the weather. The two pictures in the two phones, show the sample place. The only thing different was the weather as they were taken years apart.<br />
<br />
As for the indoor pictures, the light was not any different. It was just N95's flash being more powerful.Edited 2009-03-19 03:04 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 03:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eugenia)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
