<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21185/25_Years_of_Mac_Classic_Macs_Still_at_Work</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 19:53:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354614</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354614</guid>
			<description>they just don't build computers like they used to <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354625</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354625</guid>
			<description>That is for sure. Most machines are designed to last 18 months and then fail, it seems.<br />
 <br />
 I still use my NeXT which was made in 1992, about the same time as these Macs. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
 <br />
 The title is a little misleading, these Macs are NOT 25 years old.Edited 2009-03-24 00:05 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>i have</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354628</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354628</guid>
			<description>Edited 2009-03-24 00:15 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mellin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: i have</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354630</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354630</guid>
			<description>what a brilliant and content-rich comment</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ebasconp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354632</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354632</guid>
			<description>I love my NEXTstation Mono too!  But it just go to show.......IF IT AINT BROKE WHY FIX IT!  I still use my Epson QX-10 along with my FAT MAC 512 play with every now and then.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 00:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Accident)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: i have</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354642</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354642</guid>
			<description>better than what some people write here</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mellin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: i have</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354650</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354650</guid>
			<description>Completely agreed. <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:55:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (ebasconp)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Loved my classic II</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354651</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354651</guid>
			<description>To this day, one of the best computers I have ever owned (which is why its on my avater here). I got my start in programming after spending hours downloading MacPerl over a 28.8 connection, and then later on codewarrior after scraping together enough money for it.Edited 2009-03-24 03:39 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>LC III...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354653</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354653</guid>
			<description>With a 68040 coprocesor card FTW!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Devils_Advocate)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>SYLAR</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354654</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354654</guid>
			<description>Quick run it is Sylar and he is there to slice open the head of the II.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/santa_fe_classic004.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://cultofmac.com/wp-content/uploads/santa_fe_classic004.jpg</a> <br />
<br />
<a href="http://cultofmac.com/25-years-of-mac-classic-macs-still-at-work/7468" rel="nofollow">http://cultofmac.com/25-years-of-mac-classic-macs-still-at-work/746...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (John Blink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The old Apple Web Server Directory</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354687</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354687</guid>
			<description>It's also nice to see how some people got 25+ year old macs running as web servers. Take a look at this Apple IIe:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.ld8.org:6502/" rel="nofollow">http://www.ld8.org:6502/</a><br />
<br />
Or this Apple Lisa:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.lisa2.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lisa2.com/</a><br />
<br />
It still amazes me to think these machines were introduced such a long time before Tim Berners-Lee laid the grounds for the World Wide Web.<br />
<br />
More on the old Apple Web Server Directory here:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://servers.ld8.org/" rel="nofollow">http://servers.ld8.org/</a><br />
<br />
:-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Governa)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Bundy Computers in Center City Philadelphia</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354694</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354694</guid>
			<description>Hi,<br />
<br />
One of the last Mac stores around, Bundy Computer, has a classic Mac (I think it is a Quadra 610) with an Imagewriter II printer working as their POS system, and the ImageWriter II printed my receipt.<br />
<br />
The cashier indicated they have no intent to change what still works <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> .  This was a year or so ago, I don't know if its still there, but it probably is.  They do still service them.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mbpark)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Power Mc 1992?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354719</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354719</guid>
			<description>I think the mentioned Power Mac can not be from the year 92 ... it came out 3 years later!<br />
<br />
also a little bit missleading are &quot;20 megabytes of memory&quot; - this was not RAM but Harddisk! RAM was only 2 megs back than...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cybergorf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>even older stuff:</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354722</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354722</guid>
			<description>my copyshop still uses an atari 1040 st to control the copiers.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (puenktchen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by saroly</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354724</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354724</guid>
			<description>The heck is this??? Was that some kind of lame attempt at spam, or am I just being obtuse?<br />
<br />
Back on topic ... one of the oldest machines I remember seeing &amp; using in a work environment was this behemoth of a &quot;mini&quot; (HP of some kind, if I recall) that ran FORTRAN to do gas chromatographic analysis. The thing was hooked up to a ginormous hard disk drive the size of a small washing machine ... might've been a Western Digital. You had to go through a very elaborate startup sequence to get the hard drive spooled up to operating speed.<br />
<br />
Compared to the IBM370 mainframe that you communicated with via DECWriter teletype terminals or (WOW!!!) black &amp; white Perkin Elmer all-in-one terminals that communicated via acoustic modem (phone handset nestled into rubber holders <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  ) ... can't remember the speed, but it didn't download characters much faster than I could type ... might've been less than 300 baud at the time ...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MissinBeOS)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>TCO !!!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354727</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354727</guid>
			<description>there are some things that just make me smile <br />
<br />
This machine has gone to prove what Mac users tend to say. It is not a disposable machine it is a Mac, and five years in, ten years in heck twenty years in it will still do what it is supposed to do. It is a testament that _some_ people (but by no means all people) will pay a little bit more for quality. <br />
<br />
Most of us Mac users have at least one really old box that still feels fun or just refuses to die.<br />
<br />
*(Then there is seeing my enemy driven before me and the lamentation of their women... -=- which is the same in my mind as hearing FUD/BS i.e. Macs Suck/ are expensive)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaelodest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>in 91 I had an LC</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354733</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354733</guid>
			<description>I still have my LC w/68020 that I paid close to $2000 in the end of 1991 (cpu, keyboard, inkjet and 12&quot; monitor).  I was a student and between the time I ordered it and received it, the LC II was announced. I was bummed.  My LC had 4Mb memory (now at the max 10Mb), and 80Meg HD.  For as much money it was, it was a dog.  I'm still trying to get my moneys worth out of it :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (GCrain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: TCO !!!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354751</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354751</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It is a testament that _some_ people (but by no means all people) will pay a little bit more for quality. </div><br />
<br />
Yeah, like those people who bought cheap C64's, Amiga's and ST's back in the day and that are still running today.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I &amp;lt;3 my C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354758</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354758</guid>
			<description>Yeah I loved My Vic 20 then my C64 I did not know at the time the real value of what I was learning in BASIC and all of the Command Line Jive it took to save (&amp;verify) a file on tape... But back to the point Commodore and Atari do not exist -=- Not in any real sense beyond a Logo for Atari and a dream for what was Commodore and is now Amiga. Apple (the Mac) did their 25 and that is cool. Apple the company goes back almost another ten years.<br />
<br />
Yes _Some_ people will be an exception to the trend. They will buy a Chevy and get 40, maybe 50 years from it but that is more of a testament to the User taking good care of it (I suppose my c64 still works but that is Schrodingers keyboard) But the road to planned obsolescence is paved with companies who sold a lot more for a few dollars less.<br />
<br />
Have you seen the inside of an old 68K Mac? They are built like  frickin' tanks.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaelodest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Old computers were made to last</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354860</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354860</guid>
			<description>I had my 1987 Amiga 500 on the internet an average of 4 hours/day <i>every single day</i> up until the end of 2008 (when I finally &quot;modernized&quot;). It ran over 20 years without a single hardware failure.<br />
<br />
Compare that to modern hardware: at work, 3 of my new notebook computers had to be returned due to failures and the one that worked had to have the hard drive replaced twice. I've seen many new computer parts fail in less than 3 months.<br />
<br />
Modern hardware sucks.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mrAmiga500)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: in 91 I had an LC</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354914</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354914</guid>
			<description>Was never a big fan of the LCs. My least favorite mac line of all time has to be the Performa though. This is the only mac I have ever downright hated <a href="http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/mac_performa/stats/mac_performa_580cd.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.everymac.com/systems/apple/mac_performa/stats/mac_perfor...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 05:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Love it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354943</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354943</guid>
			<description>I love seeing old desktop computers still doing their job. How wonderful.<br />
<br />
It's not really a testament to &quot;Macs are built better than PCs&quot; as there are still a heap of old x86 machines still running; and I've had Macs die on me before even with good care. Oh, and the tray-load iMac CD-drives were more unreliable than any single component I've ever seen on a PC :-)<br />
<br />
But yes, I hope those Classic 2s keep running for years to come!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (3rdalbum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Love it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?354991</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?354991</guid>
			<description>Anyone been in Primark (in the UK) recently - the IBM POS systems they use must be about the same vintage.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (steogede2)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: in 91 I had an LC</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?355268</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?355268</guid>
			<description>i have one with a network card and external scsi cdrom</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mellin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
