<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21229/8-Bit_Game_Creator_Now_Available_for_Order</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2010, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 03:49:20 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>UK reseller?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356030</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356030</guid>
			<description>i want to buy 5 of these for the kids.<br />
<br />
Anyone selling these in the UK?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 14:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AbuHassan)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Children like playing</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356049</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356049</guid>
			<description>Something like this could make a greater impact with children than OLPC :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dimosd)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356052</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356052</guid>
			<description>I wonder what that could do in the hands of a ten year old. If you can power it on and start to &quot;program&quot; for what BASIC is worth at least, then the possibilities are infinite...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaelodest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>WOW!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356063</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356063</guid>
			<description>Wonder if it is a full version of DOS. Too bad it's not the 6510 CPU - C64 anyone?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (johjeff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>For More on 6502</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356064</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356064</guid>
			<description>Forgot to include a link to the wonderful Wikipedia:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS_Technology_6502" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS_Technology_6502</a><br />
<br />
Jeff</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (johjeff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356065</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356065</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">If you can power it on and start to &quot;program&quot; for what BASIC is worth at least, then the possibilities are infinite... </div><br />
Some professors believe that starting with BASIC ruins one's brain for any real programming. Could this actually be an evil plot of some sort?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: UK reseller?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356094</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356094</guid>
			<description>I believe that they're shipping to other countries, but it takes longer and costs more for the shipping.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (weildish)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>hackable my bits</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356154</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356154</guid>
			<description>basic interpreter and composer? wtf? give me a famicom compatible device with usb/sd that can read 6502 programs.. and we'll talk about hackable. This doesn't do it for a true 8 bits hacker <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reduz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: hackable my bits</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356165</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356165</guid>
			<description>It's famicom compatible too, read the article. ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MobyTurbo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: hackable my bits</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356179</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356179</guid>
			<description>i know, but it's not useful for developing actual 6502 stuff for it <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 04:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (reduz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356203</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356203</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Some professors believe that starting with BASIC ruins one's brain for any real programming. Could this actually be an evil plot of some sort? </div><br />
 <br />
 Starting with BASIC didn't do hundreds of 80s kids any harm.<br />
<br />
I, myself, have gone on to learn VB, Pascal, PHP, C/C++ as well as a few smaller niche languages.Edited 2009-04-01 09:46 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356219</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356219</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Starting with BASIC didn't do hundreds of 80s kids any harm.<br />
<br />
I, myself, have gone on to learn VB, Pascal, PHP, C/C++ as well as a few smaller niche languages. </div><br />
<br />
Well, that could be the brain damage in question. :-)<br />
<br />
VB = Visual <b>Beginners</b> all-purpose symbolic instruction code.<br />
<br />
This surely convices you that I'm quite old, but BASIC was my first programming language, too (on a robotron KC 87). I'm glad that my days of BASIC and Pascal are over, allthough I sometimes practice GOTO KNEIPE : INPUT BIER. :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Doc Pain)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356228</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356228</guid>
			<description>Starting with BASIC didn't do hundreds of 80s kids any harm.<br />
<br />
I, too, started with BASIC on C64. Then I moved on to assembly, C, C++ and PHP. Never bothered with any BASICs, even Visual Basic, after C64 though <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (WereCatf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356238</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356238</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Some professors believe that starting with BASIC ruins one's brain for any real programming. Could this actually be an evil plot of some sort? </div><br />
Psh, those &quot;professors&quot; are not in touch with reality. As limited as basic is, it's still a good introduction for the curious child, where languages like C, C++, and Python might overwhelm them at that point. The very nice thing about basic, for this purpose, is its completely interpreted nature, you can run the program and monitor exactly which lines get executed, and look at said lines, all without having to learn a debugger. I'd say it's actually a very good introduction to programming for the youngsters, considering you learn some basic programming principles coupled with some basic debugging techniques. Basic itself is of limited practical use, but the principles are the same and it makes an excellent introduction.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356241</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356241</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">VB = Visual <b>Beginners</b> all-purpose symbolic instruction code.  </div><br />
<br />
To be fair, VB has grown it's roots in BASIC. In fact it's a whole new language in it's own right. And one that's actually pretty good for knocking up quick GUI interfaces to otherwise manual processes or building  MSOffice macros.<br />
Sure, it's not nearly as powerful as C++ and platform-tied unlike Java, but it's just another tool that's available for the right jobs.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">but BASIC was my first programming language, too (on a robotron KC 87). </div><br />
<br />
BBC Basic for me. I miss those machines <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356243</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356243</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Psh, those &quot;professors&quot; are not in touch with reality. </div><br />
 0 goto hell<br />
<br />
:-pEdited 2009-04-01 13:59 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356261</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356261</guid>
			<description>BBC BASIC - procedures, functions and an inline 6502 assembler. I miss the Beebs too. A bit.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Athlander)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356279</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356279</guid>
			<description>That's more like it. I was a kid when I learned BASIC - If I was learning C when I was ten then pointers would have made me pick up a skateboard and say 'fcuk computers d00d' for a solid ten years. But in BASIC I could poke a value into an address and peek it out in a whole different part of the program. Years later I found out what I had done. I sort of wish I still had those tapes.<br />
<br />
     Now I am not suggesting anyone learn basic as an adult (or use a computer that has less RAM than any modern chip has for cache) but for 1983 it was the bomb<br />
<br />
These boxes will be someones first computer too</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaelodest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Meh...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356283</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356283</guid>
			<description>I mean, it sounds novel and all, it's nice it's in production, but, seriously, why not just buy a used Commodore 64 or Atari off of Ebay, get some more peripherals, access to VAST amounts of information, and programs, etc.<br />
<br />
Yea, you can't play Nintendo games...but, the C64 and Ataris were some seriously fine computers and I think would be a better option for someone wanted to go down that path than one of these.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (whartung)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Mmmm C64</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356320</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356320</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I wonder what that could do in the hands of a ten year old. If you can power it on and start to &quot;program&quot; for what BASIC is worth at least, then the possibilities are infinite... </div><br />
<br />
Not to mention you can give one of these to your kids in those in-between years between (1) being smart enough to use a computer, and (2) being mature enough to use a computer wisely.<br />
<br />
(The years between 1 and 2 will vary by child.)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Almafeta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nice benefit</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?356323</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?356323</guid>
			<description>It seems to have gone unmentioned that sales of this product will benefit a worthy cause:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://playpower.org/" rel="nofollow">http://playpower.org/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Almafeta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
