<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21264/Debian_Gets_FreeBSD_Kernel_Support</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 17:45:25 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>GNU / freebsd and hurd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357378</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357378</guid>
			<description>1. If FreeBSD supports DTRACE then will GNU/kfreebsd support DTRACE?<br />
<br />
2. Can someone summarise why the Hurd has not yet taken off? Where are they at? What is stopping them progressing?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This is news???</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357381</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357381</guid>
			<description>Debian GNU/kFreeBSD is around since at least 2005. At least the wiki page <a href="http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD?action=info" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD?action=info</a>  was created in 2005 (scroll down).</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KAMiKAZOW)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: GNU / freebsd and hurd</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357382</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357382</guid>
			<description>@1: DTrace and ZFS should be possible.<br />
@2: Nobody works on Hurd.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 22:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KAMiKAZOW)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What about Gentoo?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357385</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357385</guid>
			<description>This is similar to Gentoo's FreeBSD project, <a href="http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/bsd/fbsd/" rel="nofollow">http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/bsd/fbsd/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lopisaur)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Is a OSNews Debian GNU/kFreeBSD review on its way?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357388</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357388</guid>
			<description>I would  like one covering:<br />
 <br />
 -Installation - I read it needs a BSD disk partitioning utility meaning not many people would be able to install it.<br />
 <br />
 -Hardware Support - Binary blobs have been removed according to Debian(should've used a free BSD kernel instead of a FreeBSD one :p). How many things do not work that would in FreeBSD?<br />
 <br />
 -Desktop Environment and Software - Does anything work at all?Edited 2009-04-06 23:05 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sakeniwefu)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: This is news???</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357390</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357390</guid>
			<description>suppositly it's now not just a port, but is strarting to look like it might be in the next release.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 23:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What about Gentoo?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357446</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357446</guid>
			<description>Quite not similar actually:<br />
<a href="http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/04/06/debian-gentoo-freebsd-gnu-kfreebsd" rel="nofollow">http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2009/04/06/debian-gentoo-freebsd-gnu-kfree...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (quarkvanlepton)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357461</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357461</guid>
			<description>Why are they using another kernel than Linux? Is it because of the many shortcomings in Linux? Linux is buggy, says Linux Kernel developer Andrew Morton:<br />
<a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/285088/" rel="nofollow">http://lwn.net/Articles/285088/</a><br />
<br />
For instance, Linux is not that good on file serving, says a storage expert:<br />
<a href="http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/sans/features/article.php/3745996" rel="nofollow">http://www.enterprisestorageforum.com/sans/features/article.php/374...</a> <br />
<br />
I dont think the short comings are the reason. Did they change Kernel just for fun?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 09:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kebabbert)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>This is great</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357477</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357477</guid>
			<description>I really like this. It doesnt state when it will be available but I guess the installers need to be adjusted first in order to support ZFS. <br />
Or this calls for a FS that supports both Linux and FreeBSD so you can boot between the two.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 10:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (marcelkoopman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357522</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357522</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Why are they using another kernel than Linux? Is it because of the many shortcomings in Linux? Did they change Kernel just for fun? </div><br />
Its just a matter of providing options. There is nothing wrong with either kernel, its just the ability to choose. Which is very good.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (marcelkoopman)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: This is news???</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357527</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357527</guid>
			<description>Naw, I hope this help all some what.......<br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD#Debian_GNU.2FkFreeBSD" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Debian_GNU/kFreeBSD#Debian_GNU.2FkFree...</a> <br />
<br />
Seems like the NetBSD is coming alone very nicely.  I hope they accept the OpenSolaris (Nexenta) soon too.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Accident)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What makes FreeBSD different...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357570</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357570</guid>
			<description>What makes FreeBSD different from Linux, or sets it appart, is it's a complete OS, not just a kernel. What would be the real reason to use just the kernel in Debian? You can have the real thing complete in one package. Plus the SysV way of handling init scripts sucks horribly.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbenitezb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357651</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357651</guid>
			<description>Why would I install Debian and use a FreeBSD kernel? I'd just install FreeBSD. Period.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 10:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kill)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Why not?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357671</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357671</guid>
			<description>its another free kernel for them to support, and they aim to be more than just a linux distro</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 13:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (spikeb)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Why?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?357704</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?357704</guid>
			<description>I don't get this too. What are the (possible) benefits over FreeBSD?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SCHWEjK)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
