<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21301/Rumours_Palm_Pre_To_Appear_April_30_USD_299_Price</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 02:21:36 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Megnets</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358408</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358408</guid>
			<description><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MegnetEdited" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MegnetEdited</a> 2009-04-13 19:04 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sb56637)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Wrong!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358410</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358410</guid>
			<description>It's Electromagnetic induction: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_induction" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrostatic_induction</a> <br />
<br />
Also, please don't feel bad about getting this wrong. To quote Wikipedia:<br />
<div class="cquote">Electrostatic induction should not be confused with electromagnetic induction; both are often referred to as 'induction'. </div></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (someone)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by wiz99</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358411</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358411</guid>
			<description>This rumored 4/30 launch date conflicts with engadget.com's findings.  Everything  is speculation at this point, so its impossible to know what to believe.  Seems there is no doubt this will occur in the next month or two though.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/palm-pre-launching-no-earlier-than-may-16/" rel="nofollow">http://www.engadget.com/2009/04/13/palm-pre-launching-no-earlier-th...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wiz99)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Wrong!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358413</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358413</guid>
			<description>yup. It's nothing that great...all it is is a loosely coupled transformer(i.e. two electromagnets). The only major trick here is compensating for losses due to loose coupling (as opposed to a transformer where the two cores are directly in contact and are geometrically symmetrical, thus fewer losses in magnetic flux)...Edited 2009-04-13 19:50 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 19:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_txf_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>A Dutch Queen? </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358414</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358414</guid>
			<description>Didn't realize the Netherlands still had a royal family. I thought it was an autonomous collective.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Only in US?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358417</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358417</guid>
			<description>Anyone has news about European release date?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 20:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lezard)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Induction efficieny</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358424</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358424</guid>
			<description>How efficient is induction?  It would be a shame if millions of phones started using this simply because it was &quot;cool&quot;.  Longer charge times, more fossil fuels burnt.  Sounds like a big negative to me.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kev009)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Induction efficieny</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358426</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358426</guid>
			<description>Feel free to plug yours to a small wind turbine...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Ventajou)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Induction efficieny</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358429</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358429</guid>
			<description>It is efficient enough...though not as efficient as plugging it into a socket. With the right contact surfaces (and geometries) and some clever signal processing you can get it so losses are negligible. Systems such as these are already used in industry when there are hazardous environments where having an electrical connection would be too dangerous (in underwater situations unfeasible).</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (_txf_)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Retail</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358438</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358438</guid>
			<description>I'm wondering when it'll be available to purchase at retail and the price.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 02:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lopisaur)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Induction efficieny</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358440</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358440</guid>
			<description>Or when charging an electric toothbrush.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 03:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358461</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358461</guid>
			<description>I jumped over and had a look a the Palm Pre page - looks like a nice phone, the disappointing thing is the small size of flash that is included and there is no mention as to whether it is possible to expand storage using some sort of flash card.<br />
  <br />
  The one thing that has been holding me back from an iPhone or an iPod touch (or any other smart phone) has been the lack of storage; I have 50GB worth of music and would like to store all of it on the device at once - the problem is that there isn't a phone out there with either sufficient storage by default or the ability to expand out to that size. If there was a 32GB model and a mini-sd slot (so I can put a 32GB card in it) - I would purchase it instantly but so far from what I have seen it has no expansion which is kind of disappointing.Edited 2009-04-14 10:53 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358488</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358488</guid>
			<description>Do you really need to carry around all 12,000+ songs at once?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (HappyGod)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358494</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358494</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Do you really need to carry around all 12,000+ songs at once? </div><br />
<br />
I don't feel the need to load and unload songs on all the time - I'd prefer to load them all on at once and have them all with me so as my mood changes through the day I'll have all my music at my finger tips.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: A Dutch Queen? </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358546</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358546</guid>
			<description>... there's some lovely filth over here!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Induction efficieny</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358547</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358547</guid>
			<description>or my granddads waterproof cordless phone...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358548</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358548</guid>
			<description>heh, I have like 50gb of music, too, but i hardly ever listen to most of it.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358561</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358561</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">heh, I have like 50gb of music, too, but i hardly ever listen to most of it. </div><br />
<br />
But the problem is that I've been in a situation where a song I haven't listened to in months - I suddenly feel like listening to it. What ever the excuse maybe it doesn't excuse phone companies from failing to provide sufficient space or at least some form of expansion that allows those who want a lot more space.<br />
<br />
Making up excuses or trying to convince me that I don't need to carry around 50GB of music doesn't change the fact that I have a demand from a product I am interested in and no one has stepped up and met that demand.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 23:07:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358569</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358569</guid>
			<description>yeah, I wish they'd start sticking dual MicroSDHC slots in phones. its not like they take up gobs of space. fit them under the battery or something.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (helf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?358601</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?358601</guid>
			<description>Sounds like a hard-drive based MP3 player is what you'd need at the moment... trouble is none of them are phones, obviously. I get where you're coming from, I've got about as much music as you do and I'd love to carry it all around with me on a flash-based device.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 04:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
