http://www.osnews.com/story/21332/New_Features_in_Glibc_2_10 Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Mon, 07 Dec 2009 01:54:33 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif http://www.osnews.com http://osnews.com/thread?359260 http://osnews.com/thread?359260 Ulrich Drepper Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:31:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Bending Unit) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?359265 http://osnews.com/thread?359265 What I found even more interesting is an automatic use of optimized function that the new glibc features. Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:47:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (cromo) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?359291 http://osnews.com/thread?359291 I thought it was 200x.

It seems to still not implemented and we will see them speaking about 203x Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:24:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (boulabiar) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?359317 http://osnews.com/thread?359317 the malloc_info function returns an xml string? mixing up xml with the libc library seems to me a bad idea. Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:51:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (TObYv) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?359354 http://osnews.com/thread?359354 Fully agree.
Using normal flat structures would have been far more useful.

- Gilboa Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:57:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (gilboa) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?359359 http://osnews.com/thread?359359 Or providing versioned reader functions that can query the otherwise opaque structure returned from mallinfo(). It's not a hard problem to solve. Looks like Ulrich just wanted to throw up his hands and let someone else deal with it. Fortunately, it's not something I really care about, so it's no big deal either way for me. Sun, 19 Apr 2009 14:53:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (siride) Comments http://osnews.com/thread?359443 http://osnews.com/thread?359443 No kidding. XML as an integral part of Glibc? Please save us from this lunacy. Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:48:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Vanders) Comments