<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21450/Scripting_the_Vim_Editor_with_Vimscript</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 04:42:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>typo</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?362397</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?362397</guid>
			<description>At first I thought VIM got a some sort of Virtual Machine that allow itself to be scripted, but I thought again just to find a typo. <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  (Vmscript -&gt; Vimscript)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 05:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (antonone)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I thought..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?362410</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?362410</guid>
			<description>lisp did that. Anyway, for my taste LUA would be a better choice.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 08:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
