OSNews: http://www.osnews.com/story/21459/Industrial-Strength_Python_Testing_Frameworks Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:13:17 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif OSNews.com http://www.osnews.com nose is the one for me http://osnews.com/thread?362541 http://osnews.com/thread?362541 I like nose + the spec plugin (http://darcs.idyll.org/~t/projects/pinocchio/doc/#spec-generate-tes...). Once you go BDD you wont go back... Sat, 09 May 2009 01:51:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja) Comments Python Rule ! http://osnews.com/thread?362549 http://osnews.com/thread?362549 Go Python go !

You'll be better than this stupid Java... Sat, 09 May 2009 02:43:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (boulabiar) Comments The article is pretty useless http://osnews.com/thread?362567 http://osnews.com/thread?362567 It doesn't do a very good job of explaining the comparative complexities involved in each approach. You really have to dig deeper in the documentation of the test apporaches.

I'll look more at the frameworks mentioned but so far they seem to use far too much configuration for the tests that are hidden from the actual test code. So it looks all snazzy and magical from the test code, but underneath its pretty ugly from my point of view.

x-unit works well and is pretty easy to understand without opening a single config file to see what exactly it did to create its parameters. But like I said I'll try to keep an open mind. There are some things that are objectively better than others, adn there are some things which are a matter of personal preference. Sat, 09 May 2009 07:23:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Bill Shooter of Bul) Comments