<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21475/ODF_Net_Apps_Netbooks_Will_Invigorate_the_OS_Landscape</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 00:19:47 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Win2k7 SP2?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363051</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363051</guid>
			<description>Could the OP please correct that? Are you guys referring to Windoze Vista? Then please use Vista not Windows 2007.<br />
<br />
I would not put it past MS to just sit idly. Lets just hope they do not counter this goodwill with EEE.<br />
 <br />
 -AdEdited 2009-05-12 15:43 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 15:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (adkilla)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Win2k7 SP2?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363059</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363059</guid>
			<description>Thanks for noticing that.  I'm talking about Office, not Windows.  It's corrrected.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (David)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Save the cork</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363062</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363062</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">This week I received a triumphal press release from the Open Document Foundation, announcing that the just-released Microsoft Office 2007 SP2 has native support for the ODF (Open Document Format) file format.  </div><br />
Perhaps we should not break out the champagne just yet:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.robweir.com/blog/2009/05/update-on-odf-spreadsheet.html</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Save the cork</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363065</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363065</guid>
			<description>yes, save the cork<br />
 but not because of microsoft<br />
 <br />
 the odf-spec is incomplete and unprecise (especialy when dealing with spreadsheets)<br />
 this will probably change with 1.2 but for now we are stuck with a html-revival of the worst kindEdited 2009-05-12 16:38 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 16:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Lots of buzzwords thrown around, granted, but...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363084</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363084</guid>
			<description>Example:<br />
<br />
&gt; The rise of XML as a lingua-franca for inter-machine communication has enabled the internet as we know it<br />
<br />
... what?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moocha)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Lots of buzzwords thrown around, granted, but...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363088</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363088</guid>
			<description>html -&gt; xhtml -&gt; xml -&gt; sgml<br />
<br />
I would say that mark-up languages in general, used in web pages as well as web-services, have enabled the web as we know it. I think that is the point.<br />
<br />
Otherwise, we might still be gophering .txt files!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 17:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Lots of buzzwords thrown around, granted, but...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363158</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363158</guid>
			<description>XML, HTML, SVG, JSON, WDSL, SOAP, XML-RPC is just text, let's be honest. And let's keep it that way. Text does work quiet well, it's fairly simple and efficient in most incarnations. You can compress it pretty good when needed.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 21:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lennie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Save the cork</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363236</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363236</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">yes, save the cork<br />
 but not because of microsoft<br />
 <br />
 the odf-spec is incomplete and unprecise (especialy when dealing with spreadsheets)<br />
 this will probably change with 1.2 but for now we are stuck with a html-revival of the worst kind </div><br />
<br />
Unfortunately so - but it doesn't help when Microsoft talks about supporting ODF but unwilling to roll up their sleeves and work with the OASIS group to get these short comings sorted out. Microsoft reminds me very much of the politician who bad mouths an oppositions idea but never proposing an alternative and rolling up their sleeves to work with the government on the idea.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 03:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Lots of buzzwords thrown around, granted, but...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363259</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363259</guid>
			<description>Nono, David Adams was definitely talking about XML - read the quote in context. And even in context it's complete BS.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 05:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moocha)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Save the cork</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363323</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363323</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Microsoft reminds me very much of the politician who bad mouths an oppositions idea but never proposing an alternative </div><br />
<br />
but ms has<br />
it's called ooxml</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 10:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (smashIt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Save the cork</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?363553</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?363553</guid>
			<description>No, that's their own shitty implementation of a supposedly &quot;open&quot; format, which - by the way - corrupted and bribed its way in many countries to become an ISO &quot;standard&quot; (I won't go into the nasty details as, unless you've been living in a cave for the past year or so, you can find references everywhere on the Internet over this mess).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (1c3d0g)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
