<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21521/Moblin_v2_User_Interface_Very_Impressive_</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 12:37:44 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364437</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364437</guid>
			<description>It has that professional touch that makesit look so atractive.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hiev)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Love it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364439</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364439</guid>
			<description>Just running it now on my netbook. I love it, and want more! <br />
<br />
From a UI perspective it tries a lot of things I've never seen before, but I've never had a smart-phone so maybe they're inherited from there. Nevertheless, it pulls them off extremely well. Even the implementation of virtual desktops seems very intuitive. It's very polished even at this stage.<br />
<br />
Technically it seems good too. It's lean, fast, works with all my hardware. <br />
<br />
I could totally see myself using this as a full time UI on my netbook when it's done.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (thecwin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gnome?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364440</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364440</guid>
			<description>Why can't they integrate some of these improvements into a real desktop like Gnome?  I see no reason to switch out my entire desktop for another...<br />
<br />
--bornagainpenguin</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bornagainenguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364443</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364443</guid>
			<description>...played with it for a bit now and like it quite a bit. A few thoughts:<br />
 <br />
 * no Email app? -&gt; Anjal will probably make it into Moblin2 final and it looks promising already.<br />
 <br />
 * no word processor? -&gt; I would expect at least Abiword... maybe something is being worked on? Abiword already runs great on X0.<br />
<br />
 * no Tomboy. Absolutely needed with nice integration like the dates stuff.<br />
<br />
 * the IM stuff did not really work for me but I'm pleased to see Telepathy/Empathy being used<br />
 <br />
 * the application starter needs some love... it works, but it feels slow. The settings category should be its own thing IMHO.<br />
 <br />
 * The over-all look is nice but the icons look a bit dull. App icons are too similar IMHO and many of the black/white glyphs (see GEdit toolbar for example) are not clear enough. The GTK widget theme could be a bit more interesting as well.<br />
 <br />
 * the window switching is just *fail*. It is actually a total show-stopper for me. Why not just have some autohide bar on the bottom for this?Edited 2009-05-19 22:58 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lithium)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Gnome?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364444</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364444</guid>
			<description>They actually use a lot of stock GNOME stuff: Metacity, Empathy, GEdit, Nautilus, PulseAudio, ControlCenter... they basicly only changed the launcher and optimized it for netbook-typical workflows.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lithium)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Gnome?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364445</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364445</guid>
			<description>The GNOME 3.0 shell is being built with Clutter.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 22:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (YEPHENAS)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364449</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364449</guid>
			<description>You've hit the nail on the head and it's certainly what struck me when I tried it out myself after becoming curious over anything else I encountered. Where the hell are the applications?<br />
<br />
Yes, it's attractive, but as I've said time and again around here if you don't have the applications and the functionality that people want, and have them built for the environment in mind, you're heading to a place called nowhere. What do they do? Yes, integrating Abiword would be nice but it has got to work well enough for people buying into devices with Moblin installed and trying to integrate beefy applications like Open Office and Evolution with the functionality most people expect into that is going to be a very tall order. Pulling in Mono for Tomboy is also going to be another unknown in the environment. Things diverge pretty quickly.<br />
<br />
Beyond the exterior french polishing the interior needs a hell of a lot of thought and work before this ever amounts to anything.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364460</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364460</guid>
			<description>Chill out it is fedora. rpm -Uvh ...<br />
<br />
At absolute worst you setup a mock chroot and do:<br />
mock -r moblin-2.0-x86_64 rebuild gnote.src.rpm or whatnot <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SEJeff)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Gnome?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364487</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364487</guid>
			<description><b><i>YEPHENAS</b> informed...</i><br />
<div class="cquote">The GNOME 3.0 shell is being built with Clutter. </div><br />
<br />
Interesting.  I hadn't been paying attention and I missed that announcement!  The videos make it look intriguing despite my preferences for the way things currently are.  I hope the Gnome developers will at least make it possible to choose between styles if they go this route.<br />
<br />
The funny thing is if they <i>do</i> end up going this route and manage to keep the hardware hit down and the code bloat low, if...if...if...then the Gnome team will have delivered on the promise of those Longhorn mockups!<br />
<br />
--bornagainpenguin</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 03:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bornagainenguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364495</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364495</guid>
			<description>Gnote (doesn't need mono like tomboy does)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mellin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364504</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364504</guid>
			<description>I don't see mono as a problem. Even with this dependency, Tomboy starts up quicker and it is well maintained (I bet gnote will be dead in a few month!)<br />
<br />
But just starting some app is no use here, it needs integration love. Just like Banshee is getting a totally new GUI just for this... (and it's using mono as well)</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 07:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lithium)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by slax</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364512</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364512</guid>
			<description>moblin 2.0 better then android</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 08:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (slax)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364535</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364535</guid>
			<description>From the point of view of what an OEM might ship on their devices and how it will all work then this is not an option. At all.<br />
<br />
I really don't know why people think that &quot;Oh, you just run rpm -.....&quot; is a real answer.Edited 2009-05-20 10:59 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 10:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Very Impressive UI!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364539</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364539</guid>
			<description>It does look very impressive, almost makes me want to drop my plan of getting an ARM based netbook, going to have to see if I can compile this for th ARM when it's released.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:25:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (motang)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364540</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364540</guid>
			<description><b><i>segedunum</b> posted...</i><br />
<div class="cquote">From the point of view of what an OEM might ship on their devices and how it will all work then this is not an option. At all.<br />
<br />
I really don't know why people think that &quot;Oh, you just run rpm -.....&quot; is a real answer. </div><br />
<br />
Apparently when Xandros delivered their version to ASUS that was good enough for them...<br />
<br />
(I'm not saying this was <i>good</i> mind you, just that I wouldn't assume corporations care as much as about users installing nonbundled apps as you're making them out to be.  Also, I think if it hadn't been possible to get Ubuntu or some other distros or even Windows XP on the EeePC it would have failed.  Hard.)<br />
<br />
--bornagainpenguin</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bornagainenguin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Very Impressive UI!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364543</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364543</guid>
			<description>Moblin has moved out of Intel and into the Linux Foundation, I believe, precisely in order to get support from the wider market, including ARM.<br />
<br />
So, don't fret, when the ARM netbooks come, they will probably come with Moblin.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 12:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lobotomik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364548</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364548</guid>
			<description>This is not a Linux distro; it is something else. It is Moblin that will be added in the existing distributions, and then stirred in order to get new and vastly improved mobile linux flavors.<br />
<br />
Soon, when you get your next Ubuntu Network Remix, or a Fedora Network Spin, it will be Moblin based, with the apparently missing apps coming from the standard existing repositories, mostrly from those of Gnome and GTK+ software.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Lobotomik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>sweet</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364550</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364550</guid>
			<description>smells promising... definitely has a sugar aftertaste!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JrezIN)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364609</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364609</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Apparently when Xandros delivered their version to ASUS that was good enough for them... </div><br />
Xandros didn't need to. They have something Moblin doesn't right now - applications. At least some anyway. If you then added additional repositories yourself then you were on your own.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">...just that I wouldn't assume corporations care as much as about users installing nonbundled apps as you're making them out to be. </div><br />
1. I don't know why you're talking about corporations.<br />
<br />
2. Corporations care just as much about applications as users, because they consist of........users. Organisations install a wide variety of applictions on their desktops every single day.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">Also, I think if it hadn't been possible to get Ubuntu or some other distros or even Windows XP on the EeePC it would have failed.  Hard. </div><br />
Well yer, because.........nothing would have ran on it.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 17:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Stupid Qestion #26</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364617</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364617</guid>
			<description>Has anyone figured out how to reboot/shutdown Moblin 2.0 Beta <b>besides</b> using the command-line? I've been using the CLI but I figure there must be a graphical way also.Edited 2009-05-20 18:23 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364646</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364646</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Pulling in Mono for Tomboy is also going to be another unknown in the environment. </div><br />
<br />
Heard of gNote? It's basically direct port of Tomboy to C++.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Well...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364720</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364720</guid>
			<description>...and from what I could see:<br />
<br />
* no shutdown menu/button. I couldn't see an option anywhere to shutdown. When I hit the power button on my netbook it shutdown without asking for confirmation.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 09:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bagnaj97)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Stupid Qestion #26</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364740</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364740</guid>
			<description>Well I couldn't figure out how to do it using the command-line. I just pressed the Power button and it shut down.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 11:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jokkel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Stupid Qestion #26</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?364766</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?364766</guid>
			<description>As root (either with sudo, or via su):<br />
<br />
Reboot: reboot<br />
Shutdown: shutdown -h now</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
