<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21568/Apple_Quietly_Updates_USD_999_MacBook</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:41:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>back to school already?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365661</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365661</guid>
			<description>What are they talking about &quot;back to school deals&quot; the summer is just starting! I bet there are some schools that aren't even done yet.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (broken_symlink)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by kaiwai</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365667</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365667</guid>
			<description>Rather strange; I bought my MacBook back when they offered the white 2.4Ghz model where the original disk space was 160GB; I'm surprised that their low end model was still using 120GB when 160GB as pretty much become the industry standard.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>i like it</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365677</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365677</guid>
			<description>the big difference here for me is the that ram is now running at 800MHz. the slight proc upgrade is nice too (as i believe intel is end of life'ing the one it was using prior) and of course the storage bump is nice. all in all for just shy of 1k it isn't a bad little laptop. I am still waiting for 10.6 to get a &quot;real&quot; mac, but this is a pretty good back to school book.<br />
<br />
also these modles still have fire wire, a major win.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 16:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>The WhiteBook is now faster than the cheap AluminumBook</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365686</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365686</guid>
			<description>The white Macbook now has a faster processor than the cheapest (but still higher-priced) Aluminum Macbook. This state of affairs can't last.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SterlingNorth)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: The WhiteBook is now faster than the cheap AluminumBook</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365688</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365688</guid>
			<description>due to the use of DDR3 in the Aluminum Macbook's the low end backbook has a decent preformance advantage over this recently updated whitebook.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Currency mismatch?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365723</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365723</guid>
			<description>So is it $999 or â¬999?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 23:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FreakyT)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>133 MHz just a slight bump now but with G4 processors</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365731</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365731</guid>
			<description>I'm glad to see Apple are continuing to update their machines as well as keeping the white MacBook alive.  I wonder if that bothers Greenpeace.  US$999 is still a good price, even though I'd wait for refurbished machines to make sure it's been checked a second time.<br />
<br />
I seem to remember when 133 MHz was a huge bump in the PowerPC G4 processor speeds so it's amusing to see that it's hardly noticed now.<br />
<br />
I noticed a rumour suggesting that the next generation iPhone would have a 600 MHz processor.  It's amazing how far we've come that 600 MHz isn't enough for e-mail and web access on a computer anymore.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 02:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Currency mismatch?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365734</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365734</guid>
			<description>It's usually been $1 = 1 Euro for European Apple customers.<br />
<br />
(Btw how do you input Euro sign on a US keyboard?)</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sukru)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: The WhiteBook is now faster than the cheap Alumi</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365747</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365747</guid>
			<description>Still, I really would be surprised if they don't bump the aluminums up to at least make 2.16GHz at the low end. (I'm a gambling man, so I'd say 2.33 or 2.4 to soon become the new aluminum minimum).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (SterlingNorth)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: 133 MHz just a slight bump now but with G4 processo</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365751</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365751</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I noticed a rumour suggesting that the next generation iPhone would have a 600 MHz processor.  It's amazing how far we've come that 600 MHz isn't enough for e-mail and web access on a computer anymore. </div><br />
<br />
it is more than sufficient  for e-mail and web access on a computer called iphone.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (puenktchen)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: back to school already?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365752</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365752</guid>
			<description>The schools here are starting in 2 weeks.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Soulbender)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: 133 MHz just a slight bump now but with G4 processo</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?365912</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?365912</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><br />
it is more than sufficient  for e-mail and web access on a computer called iphone. </div><br />
<br />
Wait, didn't it have to have a physical keyboard to be called a computer?  Didn't someone decide that for us recently?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
