<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21615/Dawn_of_the_Personal_Computer_from_Altair_to_the_IBM_PC</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:02:02 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Comment by Laurence</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?367020</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?367020</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It doesnât matter if youâre running Windows, Mac OS, or Linux. Your machine is almost certainly using Intel chips at its core  </div><br />
<br />
Touch of an exaggeration there.<br />
<br />
Nobody is going to argue that Intel don't have a major lead, but AMD's market share certainly isn't insignificant either.<br />
Plus heaps of portable devices (from netbooks to smart phones*) run non-Intel chips (some even run non-x86 chips).<br />
And not to meantion that games consoles are increasingly used as personal computers these days too.<br />
<br />
* Granted smart phones aren't &quot;PCs&quot; in the common understanding of the term, but these days most of them have Office suites, web access (internet/e-mails), games and music players - pretty much everything that the average PC owner uses.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 16:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Interesting, but flawed</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?367028</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?367028</guid>
			<description>That's an interesting article, but has some gaping holes in it. Obviously, they can't list every computer, but you can't have a proper computer history without an Amiga! If they need space, they could easily remove the failed Apple III or the XT (or AT).</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 18:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mrAmiga500)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
