<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21652/Yum_It_s_Starting_to_Get_Tasty</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:22:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>do binary delta updates work from any package version</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?367914</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?367914</guid>
			<description>Do the binary delta updates work from any package version? For example, if I had package-1.0 from the install DVD, then did a normail yum update to package-1.1 will the deltas work when going from 1.1 to 1.2? Or do they only work from the base install versions?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 10:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: do binary delta updates work from any package version</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?367921</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?367921</guid>
			<description>Yes, although Fedora Project itself might choose to not carry all the potential deltas, createrepo does allow you to generate them.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Rahul)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Link to page one</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?367934</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?367934</guid>
			<description>The link should be pointing at page 1 of the article: <a href="http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7366/1/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linux-mag.com/id/7366/1/</a> .</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Knuckles)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Fedora 11 screen shots</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?367939</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?367939</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.thecodingstudio.com/opensource/linux/screenshots/index.php?linux_distribution_sm=Fedora%2011" rel="nofollow">http://www.thecodingstudio.com/opensource/linux/screenshots/index.p...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 12:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lqsh)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>rpm has come a long way</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?367972</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?367972</guid>
			<description>Since I'm not fond RPM based distros, I was a little disappointed when I tried out the Fedora 11 Xfce spin and its GUI package manager (PackageKit?) would time out and lock up without any indication of what was going on.  Reminded me a bit of Yast and why I left openSUSE.  Anyway, at the request of some helpful people at the forums, I removed the default GUI package manager and installed yumex, and what do you know, it makes a world of difference.  Now I'm learning to work from the command line with yum, which isn't much different from apt, pacman, or pkg_install.  Binary diffs are a godsend.  Like I said, I've never much cared for RPM based distros, not since the Redhat 5.2 days, but Fedora 11 is starting to grow on me.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:21:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (joekiser)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Fedora 11</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?367977</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?367977</guid>
			<description>Wish I could use Fedora 11, I tried the Live CD to see if it work with my hardware.  However, the usb mouse and keyboard did not work.  Maybe I should try the actual install DVD.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 16:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kjamc1982)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Fedora 11</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?368001</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?368001</guid>
			<description>Please file a bug.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 19:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
