<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21737/Palm_webOS_SDK_Leaked</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 21:39:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>I don't believe, sometimes...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370634</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370634</guid>
			<description>Sometimes it looks for me like some companies are using such &quot;leaks&quot; like marketing tools. What's the point of such behavior? I must be to simple guy to follow all these intrigues, high-level strategies... Or I just don't believe in good intentions of any company today.<br />
<br />
It doesn't matter if it was &quot;controlled leak&quot; or not. In both scenarios it's bad thing. I'm not happy with that. One option is, that someone really wanted this &quot;leak&quot; for some unknown reason, the other is that someone just make this leak because he is not responsible.<br />
<br />
Are you happy with that? I'm not.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wawrzyn)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370639</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370639</guid>
			<description>I've hear that GNOME 3 source code has been leaked also.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 00:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Hiev)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: I don't believe, sometimes...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370642</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370642</guid>
			<description>The use of 'leaks' have been used for years; from politics to business the best way to get a 'feel' for how people react to a given idea or product is to 'leak it' so then at least one can quickly distance oneself from the product to save face by claiming it was an incredibly early beta and there is a lot more work to be done (if people complain about flaws in the design (not implementation)) or some other reasoning.<br />
 <br />
 What I think will be the interesting part will be how Palm approach the matter; are they going to come down on enthusiasts like a tonne of bricks (and I call them enthusiasts because I don't see any malicious intent, assuming it was a leak, it speaks for the enthusiasm people have for this new platform) or will they cut to the chase, launch it as a pre-beta, and use it as an opportunity to say how enthusiastic developers  are for this new product (which could also help their share price).Edited 2009-06-28 01:25 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 01:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Palm Should Release the Beta Now, Not Later</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370649</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370649</guid>
			<description>IMO, Palm should openly release the beta version to everybody right away. If it's beta, it means it's not finished yet and everybody understands that. Besides, nothing is ever finished in the computer world, so who cares? That's how Microsoft and the others stay in business, right?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Mapou)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Palm Should Release the Beta Now, Not Later</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370650</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370650</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">IMO, Palm should openly release the beta version to everybody right away. If it's beta, it means it's not finished yet and everybody understands that. Besides, nothing is ever finished in the computer world, so who cares? That's how Microsoft and the others stay in business, right? </div><br />
<br />
True <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
But one also has to recognise the difference between interface stability (in the form of API's) and product stability. I'd assume that the reason why they hadn't released it was because WebOS is still undergoing some changes as demonstrated by the quick succession of updates. I'm sure Palm doesn't want to release an SDK only to find that  over the next 6 months there will be major interface changes as things settle down and thus leave software developers aiming at a moving target.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 02:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>yes, minister</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370655</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370655</guid>
			<description>&quot;The ship of governement is the only ship that leaks from the top&quot; <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 06:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mojmir)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: yes, minister</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370660</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370660</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">&quot;The ship of governement is the only ship that leaks from the top&quot; <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" />  </div><br />
<br />
lol, reminds me of the question from the reporter, &quot;so, how would you like it represented? sources close to the prime minister? anonymous insider divulges information?&quot;<br />
<br />
Mind you, they do say the definition of pickaniny is: &quot;the process where by the prime minister is chosen&quot; (courtesy of, &quot;I'm sorry I haven't a clue&quot;).</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 15:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (kaiwai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: yes, minister</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?370666</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?370666</guid>
			<description>Great citation! :-) It will be my email signature :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (wawrzyn)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
