<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21804/Recent_Internet_Explorer_Flaw_a_Year_Old</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 22:33:32 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>not really anything new</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?372672</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?372672</guid>
			<description>MS has had many holes they have known about for long long periods of time that are fixed way after (or are at least made public way after). what i am corious about is if this is getting attention now, does that mean someone or somethings has been exploiting it?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 21:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: not really anything new</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?372746</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?372746</guid>
			<description>From what I've read the exploit has been employed for about a month and has already taken some traction.<br />
<br />
Not much more, could Google it... but I'm lazy...</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 03:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (looncraz)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>One year? Not too bad!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?372801</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?372801</guid>
			<description>If Microsoft was warned of this a year ago, that's not too bad.<br />
<br />
Of course, I'm joking; if they were warned a year ago, then the problem should have been fixed 364 days ago. But look at Apple - they were warned of a particular dumb security problem four years before they fixed it. The infamous one; where Applescripts could tell setuid root programs to launch and &quot;run a shell script&quot; as root.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 11:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (3rdalbum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: One year? Not too bad!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?372875</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?372875</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">If Microsoft was warned of this a year ago, that's not too bad.<br />
<br />
Of course, I'm joking; if they were warned a year ago, then the problem should have been fixed 364 days ago. But look at Apple - they were warned of a particular dumb security problem four years before they fixed it. The infamous one; where Applescripts could tell setuid root programs to launch and &quot;run a shell script&quot; as root. </div><br />
<br />
Well, Apple didn't integrate Samba fixes for 2 years, right?  It's surprising that they've put out security fixes for Safari 4, twice since it was released.  That probably means that the iPhone version is hanging out in the open, but there are only a few million users, right?<br />
<br />
Well, IE and WinXP make a powerful combination for looters anyway and almost always has.  I can't count all the times the t.v. news was talking about identity theft as the user was videotaped using IE.  The interesting thing about this one is that Win2000 isn't affected and that Vista isn't affected either.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bousozoku)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: One year? Not too bad!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?372912</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?372912</guid>
			<description>Without being overly paranoid, was Microsoft using this &quot;entry point&quot; for its own purposes given that Windows XP has been its dominant business/end-user product for about 6-7 years now?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BlueofRainbow)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
