<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21863/How_Apple_s_App_Review_Is_Undermining_The_iPhone</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 06:50:34 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Not sure...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374308</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374308</guid>
			<description>There are roughly 50,000 apps in the store. There are a lot of high quality ones as well. While the process could be tweaked I am sure I think &quot;undermining&quot; is way too strong  word.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sigzero)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Here we go again..</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374332</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374332</guid>
			<description>Last time this was discussed here people came with the sugestion that iphone developers are just like prostitutes: They are mistreated but (generally) get their money<br />
 <br />
 I myself think that's the best explanation to the situation, and as a developer I still prefer to be well treated AND get my money, so no Apple iPhone for meEdited 2009-07-21 01:53 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 01:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (puelocesar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Not sure...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374370</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374370</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">There are roughly 50,000 apps in the store. There are a lot of high quality ones as well. While the process could be tweaked I am sure I think &quot;undermining&quot; is way too strong  word. </div><br />
<br />
When developers get refused when trying to upload patches to an app already on the store - I'd consider that undermining.<br />
<br />
When developers get whole apps refused because the application streams adult songs, despite the same songs being available to buy on Apples music store - then I'd consider that undermining.<br />
<br />
When developers get whole apps refused because it's an RSS feed to a site with swear words, despite that website being freely accessible by Apples own apps - then I'd consider that undermining.<br />
<br />
I could go on as there's plenty of evidence online of Apples bi-polar approach to censorship and their downright lack of respect towards the people who really made the iPhone great (lets face it, it's one of Apples biggest marketing angles).<br />
<br />
Apple are really going to have to pull their head of the sand (and quick) because they no longer have the <i>&quot;isn't it sexy&quot;</i> and <i>&quot;it just works well&quot;</i> markets cornered what with Palm Pre and Android joining the fight and Blackburry, Nokia and Samsung making huge strides to catch up.<br />
Plus you can bank on MS not to hang about too long (and given their massive app cateloge, they already have a head-start in some respects).</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 07:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Laurence)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>if they had the power</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374393</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374393</guid>
			<description>Just imagine, if they had the power to do this with computers....</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 11:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (alcibiades)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Slow news eh?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374409</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374409</guid>
			<description>Ummm, exactly *how* is this news? Just over a month ago, we read exactly the same thing, but then more in-depth: <a href="http://osne.ws/gq6" rel="nofollow">http://osne.ws/gq6</a><br />
<br />
The same author who was quoted there, also wrote:<br />
- a follow-up post on why he sticks to the iPhone: <a href="http://www.marco.org/124697680" rel="nofollow">http://www.marco.org/124697680</a><br />
- his philosophy on Apple using artificial delay: <a href="http://www.marco.org/98546611" rel="nofollow">http://www.marco.org/98546611</a></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:23:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eddyspeeder)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Apple do outline what they do and don't accept</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374413</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374413</guid>
			<description>If I choose to ignore the guidelines they setout and spend Â£Â£Â£ on dev time, that is my choice.<br />
<br />
Take an example<br />
<br />
Skype producing an iphone app.  <br />
<br />
The rules PLAINLY stipulate that that this kind of app is against the rules.  If you develop it anyway, expect it to be rejected.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 12:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Adurbe)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Not sure...</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374420</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374420</guid>
			<description>I don't speak for the populous, but in and around my area blackberry's are more popular than iPhones.  So much in fact I can think of at least three iPhone users who have dumped the iPhone for blackberry's.<br />
<br />
That has nothing to do with the app store.  However, one of those guys that dumped the iPhone was working on iPhone development.  He gave up when all four of his apps where rejected.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 13:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (systyrant)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Apple do outline what they do and don't accept</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374490</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374490</guid>
			<description>Great. Too bad about the other 99% of the time, when iPhone apps are rejected for reasons* that have nothing to do with those rules (which are stupid and arbitrary to begin with).<br />
<br />
*if the random, arbitrary whims of Apple staff can rightly be called &quot;reasons,&quot; that is.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BallmerKnowsBest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: if they had the power</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374505</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374505</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Just imagine, if they had the power to do this with computers.... </div><br />
Exactly! It's just chilling.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sicofante)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: if they had the power</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374508</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374508</guid>
			<description>That's one of the reason I like Personal Computers, becuase the &quot;powers that be&quot; have no control over my computer and canno</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 19:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fretinator)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Apple do outline what they do and don't accept</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?374695</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?374695</guid>
			<description>Precisely. See the links I posted in my above comment.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 16:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Eddyspeeder)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
