<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21904/Microsoft_Details_Browser_Ballot_Screen_Also_for_XP_Vista_Users</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:38:05 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Opera</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375754</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375754</guid>
			<description>$50 says Opera complains if they arn't the first choice of the alternative broswers...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Opera</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375755</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375755</guid>
			<description>Opera will probably complain even if they are the first choice.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tom9729)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Opera</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375757</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375757</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Opera will probably complain even if they are the first choice. </div><br />
         No. HÃ¥kon Wium Lie will suggest that it might be a good idea for the EU to force MS to present Opera's entry in a slightly more eye-catching font than anyone else, in addition to being first, and then go on to suggest that Debian and gNewSense might should make an exception to their most basic philosophical policies and do the same thing. And then OSNews reader &quot;hangman&quot; will bang out 47 more posts asserting that he was the only person who really read the article, doggedly ignoring all evidence to the contrary.Edited 2009-07-28 19:52 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (sbergman27)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375759</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375759</guid>
			<description>It will be interesting to see what happens later down the road... will other types of program be subject to this sort of balloting process?  Music player?  Instant messaging application?  Office suite?<br />
<br />
Installers like Anaconda already ask, but their system for selecting stuff has a lot of, well, helper programs rather than full-featured applications on it too.  And there are lots of choices.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:02:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DigitalAxis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375760</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375760</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">It will be interesting to see what happens later down the road... will other types of program be subject to this sort of balloting process?  Music player?  Instant messaging application?  Office suite?<br />
<br />
Installers like Anaconda already ask, but their system for selecting stuff has a lot of, well, helper programs rather than full-featured applications on it too.  And there are lots of choices. </div><br />
<br />
Can you think of anything shipped with Windows that actually has a monopoly position that harmed the market?</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375762</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375762</guid>
			<description>Actually Thom, when it was just IE and Netcape having IE in there did basically kill off Netscape. Also when MS used to bundle Office on computers at most retail stores that pretty much killed word perfect. They started doing things things right when their competitors could have grabbed a real foot hold in the market. <br />
 <br />
 Of course now it's totally different, and both the 2 products I mentioned had companies that worked with the OEM's for inclusion with windows as the defaults (Music match Jukebox also comes ot mind). <br />
 <br />
 But, in this current market, a media player and a web brsowers are common place. To not have them is a disservice to the customer, and I do not sympathise with any company that isn't willing to play the game to get their product included on a system they themselves didn't create. This is not the late 90's,  stop treating MS like it is. They did anti competitive things then, now they are doing the same as every other OS provider out there. The issue should have been dismissed in court with prejudice...Edited 2009-07-28 20:15 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:14:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375764</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375764</guid>
			<description>How about Windows Media Player?<br />
 <br />
 WMA... WMV... other proprietary formats which are all over the Internet, and can only &quot;legally&quot; be played back on an OS Microsoft says you can (Windows, Windows, Windows, maybe Novell's Linux, and Mac...).  And because Windows has a monopoly...a disgusting number of sites uses them.<br />
 <br />
 The Apple side is really no better though, with QuickTime...<br />
<br />
They might not be monopoly-level, but I think they've caused some damage when it comes to cross-platform media playback.Edited 2009-07-28 20:24 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (UltraZelda64)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375765</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375765</guid>
			<description>Well, Microsoft Word; they basically have a lock on everything business related.<br />
<br />
I was actually considering the implications of installing a system where you selected components via this ballot system, as opposed to the normal approach.  Anaconda, as I mentioned, does have something like it, but if memory serves you can drill down a lot farther into it than just major applications.  (Bluetooth libraries, etc.)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DigitalAxis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375766</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375766</guid>
			<description>yes the Anaconda installer has been able to do that since (at least) readhat linux 8.0 (ah the blue curve theme, good times).</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375767</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375767</guid>
			<description>You mean like you could with Windows 95 / NT 4 and Windows 98(SE) ?<br />
<br />
Once upon a time Microsoft actually gave the user the option to decide what to install and not install; heck, even the browser was completely optional <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dylansmrjones)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375769</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375769</guid>
			<description>Sorry for my rant..<br />
  I would like to see similar ballot box when I install your favourite ubuntu or pclos or mepis etc.<br />
  i would like to see you guys demand ballot box for tires, windshield, colors etc when you buy a new car at GM or toyota<br />
  I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box for onions, lettuce, tomatos, bread when buying chicken sandwitch at Mcdonalds..<br />
  I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box forr shirt buttons or pant zippers when you buy cloths. Of course linux gurus like choices, so why not choice for zippers....<br />
  GPL has its own nice world of freedom and choices. It should not interfere(and vice versa) in the cruel and notorious world of for-profit businesses....Both should stay their courses to make world happyEdited 2009-07-28 20:46 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rakamaka)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375770</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375770</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Opera actually complained about the use of icons, stating that it provides an unfair advantage to IE, as people will recognize the icon more easily. </div><br />
<br />
Complain about having the name of the browser too... people will recognize Internet Explorer more easily.<br />
Shut up, stop crying.<br />
<br />
P.S. That wasn't a direct quote, I fixed the spelling of recognize.  Whoever wrote this should have used Firefox with built in spell checking.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375771</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375771</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">The Apple side is really no better though, with QuickTime... </div><br />
Last time I checked, Apple fully pushes MPEG-4 with QuickTime, not VP7 or other  proprietary codecs.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (KugelKurt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375772</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375772</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">P.S. That wasn't a direct quote, I fixed the spelling of recognize.  Whoever wrote this should have used Firefox with built in spell checking. </div><br />
 <br />
 P.S.: Recognise with an &quot;s&quot;, as spelled in the article, is British English. I study British English, so that's what I write in. I find it hilarious that people STILL don't know that. I mean, seriously.<br />
 <br />
 I have the British English version of Chrome.Edited 2009-07-28 20:50 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:50:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Download on Windows install?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375774</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375774</guid>
			<description>When I read the paper from Microsoft, I noticed the following:<br />
<br />
&quot;An âinstallâ link will connect to a vendor-managed distribution server, which, upon the userâs confirmation, can directly download the installation package of the selected web browser&quot;<br />
<br />
So let's assume I install Windows from a CD and don't have an internet connection set up already. Then I won't be able to download a different browser, because it would have to be downloaded from the internet.<br />
This situation will also occur, when I buy a new PC and it's internet connection is not setup already. <br />
<br />
Granted this situation hasn't happened to me in the last 8 years. I always had a LAN or WiFi network I could easily connect to.<br />
<br />
The best news on this browser ballot is, that it'll also be on Vista and Windows XP. All newspapers will run stories on the alternative browsers, when the ballot is pushed out by Microsoft on auto-update. This is a great thing for the other browsers.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jokkel)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375775</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375775</guid>
			<description>&quot;I would like to see similar ballot box when I install your favourite ubuntu or pclos or mepis etc.&quot;<br />
  <br />
  many linux installers give you said options already.<br />
  <br />
  &quot;i would like to see you guys demand ballot box for tires, windshield, colors etc when you buy a new car at GM or toyota&quot;<br />
  <br />
  have you ever been to an automotive companies website? most allow for customization.<br />
  <br />
  &quot;I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box for onions, lettuce, tomatos, bread when buying chicken sandwitch at Mcdonalds.&quot; <br />
  <br />
  go to a sit down and order off a menu resturant, then you can make such requests, i know, i've done it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . Hell even fast food joints typically understand a request for &quot;No _________&quot; (where ______ = what you don't want).<br />
  <br />
  &quot;I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box forr shirt buttons or pant zippers when you buy cloths.&quot;<br />
  <br />
  you mean cutome tailerd clothing? my god, if only there were such a thing. oh wait, there is, its the thing i just said.<br />
  <br />
  thanks for playing...Edited 2009-07-28 21:09 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375776</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375776</guid>
			<description>The thing that most people seem to forget when they bring up the netscape thing, is by the end, netscape *really* sucked. It was a thorn in the side of web developers the same way IE6 is now, where special time always had to be alotted to working through its &quot;quirks&quot;. <br />
<br />
I always wonder if Netscape had won the browser wars, if we would all be using their proprietary LAYER extensions rather then the CSS standards that ms adopted in IE.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Opera</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375777</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375777</guid>
			<description>I am thinking their next proposal will be that the icons will have to be sized in reverse proportion to their current market share, and when the mouse is passed over the Opera O, it must become bathed in holy light.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Download on Windows install?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375781</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375781</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">So let's assume I install Windows from a CD and don't have an internet connection set up already. Then I won't be able to download a different browser, because it would have to be downloaded from the internet. </div><br />
<br />
<br />
Well, if you are not connected to the internet, having a browser doesn't really matter anyway does it? You can always just click the icon on the desktop that opens the Ballot up and do it when you are connected to the net.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DrillSgt)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375782</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375782</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I would like to see similar ballot box when I install your favourite ubuntu or pclos or mepis etc </div><br />
Already exists on most distros.  <br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">i would like to see you guys demand ballot box for tires, windshield, colors etc when you buy a new car at GM or toyota </div><br />
It's been a long time since I shopped for a new car, but last time I did I could chose tires and colour.  I doubt things have changed.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box for onions, lettuce, tomatos, bread when buying chicken sandwitch at Mcdonalds.. </div><br />
I haven't been to McDonalds in years and years, but all hamburger joints I do go let me chose exactly what I want on my burgere.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box forr shirt buttons or pant zippers when you buy cloths. </div><br />
Most clothes brands offer a range of options in shirts and pants, some with buttons some with zippers so again plenty of choice.  And even if one brand doesn't offer what you're looking for the is no interoperability problems with buying shirts and pants from different vendors.  Also most shirt vendors are happy to sell you just a shirt and don't demand that you also buy their pants if you don't need them.  And even if I can't find any vendors offering a shirt that I like, there plenty of people who can quickly and easily make me shirt to my exact specifications without any problems.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dagw)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375784</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375784</guid>
			<description>Will you buy pant without zippers or car without tires..that is my point of difference between GPL and cruel business world.....<br />
 You have to accept whatever Microsoft offer at their stated price. You cannot demand whatever you like... <br />
&quot;I would like to see similar ballot box when I install your favourite ubuntu or pclos or mepis etc.&quot;<br />
   <br />
   <i>many linux installers give you said options already</i>.<br />
 ---NO, ubuntu, pclos etc dont give you choice to install browsers like FF, opera etc or openoffice vs abiword while installing the distro on HD. You get what they bundle in .iso file. You can happily 'uninstall anything' afterwards..<br />
   &quot;i would like to see you guys demand ballot box for tires, windshield, colors etc when you buy a new car at GM or toyota&quot;<br />
   <br />
  <i> have you ever been to an automotive companies website? most allow for customization.</i><br />
   ---NO, you have to select from what 'they' offer. you cannot demand your choice of pink or yellow color<br />
   <br />
 &quot;I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box for onions, lettuce, tomatos, bread when buying chicken sandwitch at Mcdonalds.&quot; <br />
   <br />
   go to a sit down and order off a menu resturant, then you can make such requests, i know, i've done it <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> . Hell even fast food joints typically understand a request for &quot;No _________&quot; (where ______ = what you don't want).<br />
 --NO AGAIN. You cannot ask Mcdonalds to put your choice of roma tomatos or red onions. You have to 'select' from whatever 'they offer'<br />
   <br />
   &quot;I would like to see you guys demanding ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers when you buy cloths.&quot;<br />
   <br />
   <i>you mean cutome tailerd clothing? my god, if only there were such a thing. oh wait, there is, its the thing i just said.</i><br />
 ---NO custom tailered shirts and pants are thing of past, because it is expensive finally, time consuming, and not worth of fitting and refitting...like linux installation vs tailer-made windows.<br />
   <br />
   thanks for playing...Edited 2009-07-28 21:29 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rakamaka)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by TBPrince</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375785</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375785</guid>
			<description>That document is very detailed. Well, end of the story: Microsoft gave up on creating their own special environment via IE and reverted to compliant implementation.<br />
<br />
This probably has much more to do in promoting their server-side stack. Anyway, we won't miss browser war for sure. This will be a better world for Web Developers ;-)</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TBPrince)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375786</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375786</guid>
			<description>I used to study British English in school, but I never accepted it. I'm a big fan of American English.<br />
<br />
&quot;Recognise&quot; is more or less OK, but I just can't cope with stuff like &quot;colour&quot;, &quot;programme&quot;, &quot;centre&quot;, etc.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (drstorm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by TBPrince</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375787</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375787</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Anyway, we won't miss browser war for sure. This will be a better world for Web Developers ;-) </div><br />
I hope you're right, but we'll see...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (drstorm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375788</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375788</guid>
			<description>Don't they use h.264, which has a whole set of licencing requirements around it?  I was under the impression that all of the video codecs aside from the OSS ones were 'proprietary.'</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:52:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (PlatformAgnostic)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Not going to be a ballot for everything</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375791</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375791</guid>
			<description>There's not going to be a ballot for everything.<br />
<br />
The EU is being a bit of pain.  That's for sure.  I personally don't see anything wrong with any bundling, not conforming to standards... Yes, i know many here think you must be satan not to conform to web standards... but I don't.  Let's leave it at that.  I'd like to leave it to people and customers to push for things to get done.<br />
<br />
That said... the things the EU are pushing back on are things we would consider platforms on their own.  Things that *could* create an entirely new market and they don't want that market tied to a single OS.<br />
<br />
It doesn't take a genius to see the web browser as a new platform for application.<br />
<br />
It doesn't seem that important now, but back when they pushed back against media players, that was also seen as a platform to distribute media.  Sadly, MS did such a terrible job of developing it into a platform <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
Do I think this option will help users?  Not really.  Should this option be provided more towards OEMs (Dell, HP...) absolutely.  At least the OEM's would be responsible for supporting the product and choice of web browser in that case.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 21:58:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Yamin)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375801</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375801</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">GPL has its own nice world of freedom and choices. It should not interfere(and vice versa) in the cruel and notorious world of for-profit businesses </div><br />
By the way you do realize that the main driving force behind this is Opera Software, a for-profit company that has nothing to do with the GPL or Open Source software in any way.  The GPL and its 'world' has nothing to do with this.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 22:28:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (dagw)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by motang</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375811</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375811</guid>
			<description>Was going to complain as to why XP is on the list but considering the fact as to how dominant that OS is still it makes sense, plus netbooks are coming with XP also.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (motang)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375813</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375813</guid>
			<description>To this day, I can never understand the Poms who spell &quot;flour&quot; with a u. How unnecessary.<br />
<br />
(With things like &quot;lighted&quot; instead of lit, and words like &quot;gotten&quot; frequently used, putting a full stop after Mr, Mrs, Ms, etc - American English is hardly more efficient).</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (rajan r)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375825</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375825</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">"<i>P.S. That wasn't a direct quote, I fixed the spelling of recognize. Whoever wrote this should have used Firefox with built in spell checking. </div> P.S.: Recognise with an &quot;s&quot;, as spelled in the article, is British English. I study British English, so that's what I write in. I find it hilarious that people STILL don't know that. I mean, seriously. I have the British English version of Chrome. </i>"<br />
<br />
Recognise, spelled with an &quot;s&quot;, is indeed the British English spelling.<br />
<br />
Becasue the language English is actually British English, then this word is correctly spelled as it was (with an &quot;s&quot;) in England, Australia and New Zealand, and most other places (mostly small) colonised by the British where English is now the country's official language.<br />
<br />
In South Africa, English is only the third language. AFAIK, South Africa would also follow the British spelling conventions. Canada has probably been corrupted (spelling-wise) by its proximity to the US.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 23:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lemur2)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375827</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375827</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">To this day, I can never understand the Poms who spell &quot;flour&quot; with a u. How unnecessary. (With things like &quot;lighted&quot; instead of lit, and words like &quot;gotten&quot; frequently used, putting a full stop after Mr, Mrs, Ms, etc - American English is hardly more efficient). </div><br />
<br />
Without the &quot;u&quot;, the word flour would read as the same pronunciation as floor, rhymes with door.<br />
<br />
AFAIK, in countries where English is the first language, British spelling conventions are followed more often than American spelling.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 00:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (lemur2)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375832</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375832</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Canada has probably been corrupted (spelling-wise) by its proximity to the US. </div><br />
The Canadian English dictionnary usually accept both spellings. To my experience, the french-speaking minority learns English as second language with the American spelling, although the british spelling is usually closer to our own spelling.<br />
<br />
OSnews: now with LanguageNews!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Wrawrat)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>I think you're wrong here.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375840</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375840</guid>
			<description>First, WMV isn't &quot;proprietary&quot;, as VC-1 was standardized a few years ago as an STMPE standard.  WMV today refers to Microsoft's implementation of that standard.  WMV files can be played on any platform.<br />
<br />
WMA, I don't think has been standardized, but it too can be played on any platform.<br />
<br />
Neither format has a monopoly.  WMA isn't used at all except for Zune (and PlayForSure) DRM'ed music (and some DVD players can play WMA CDs).  WMV, I think, still rules the commercial downloaded videos space, but MPEG4 is catching up, DivX dominates the non-commercial downloaded video space (and is the preferred format for pirated DVD video), and Flash long ago took over the embedded video space.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 01:24:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (MollyC)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>4 alternatives</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375848</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375848</guid>
			<description>More than I expected:<br />
<br />
&gt; The Ballot Screen will prominently display the final releases of the five web browsers with the highest usage share in the EEA as measured by a source commonly agreed between Microsoft and the European Commission<br />
<br />
I guess that means Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, Safari and Opera. Pretty much everybody is in (unless I am missing something).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 02:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (elmimmo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>What's that?!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375868</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375868</guid>
			<description>What's the rightmost icon in the article's picture?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Glynser)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Opera</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375869</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375869</guid>
			<description>Nah, Opera will want a selection dialog with 10 different icons, all pointing to the Opera download <img src="/images/emo/tongue.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:08:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (l3v1)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: ballot box for shirt buttons or pant zippers!!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375870</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375870</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">---NO, ubuntu, pclos etc dont give you choice to install browsers like FF, opera etc  </div><br />
<br />
Well, the Debian installer allows you to select packages right from the installer. Use Debian <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" />  Yes, it's my favourite, if you couldn't tell <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 06:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (l3v1)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375876</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375876</guid>
			<description>Flour?  You mean, the ingredient in cakes and breads?  That's ALWAYS been spelled 'flour'.<br />
<br />
Somehow I suspect you knew that though.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (DigitalAxis)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What's that?!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375878</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375878</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">What's the rightmost icon in the article's picture? </div><br />
<br />
Mosaic.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Thom_Holwerda)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: What's that?!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375881</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375881</guid>
			<description>LOL!<br />
Including that would be a cool idea <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Glynser)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>why the complaints</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375882</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375882</guid>
			<description>Given all the historical complaining about the mess that is IE and the complaints about the monopolistic nature of Microsoft, I don't quite see where the complaints (especially from a knowledgeable group such as the posters on this forum) are coming from.<br />
  <br />
  IE has been a disaster for years. Due to the refusal to fully embrace established web standards, many web sites (though not so much now) would not fully work with anything but IE â" surely not a good situation?<br />
  <br />
  The acknowledged ease with which IE allows malware to corrupt machines has been a favourite subject for many years.<br />
  <br />
  There has historically been no incentive for Microsoft to improve their product to address the many shortcomings with their browser. Inertia is a powerful force, especially when coupled to ignorance of the alternatives.<br />
  <br />
  Then along came Firefox. Now let's be clear, in my opinion, the main innovation with this browser has been the marketing and the development model. Other than the âadd-in' facility I don't really see great innovation. Opera has innovated for years. Firefox is excellent, no doubt, but innovative, no.<br />
  <br />
  So where are we?<br />
  <br />
  Default installation in Windows gives us a malware attracting, non-standards compliant âmare of a program. We have Firefox that is an excellent piece of software that has rightly taken a chunk out of the IE market share. We also have Opera, a program that really has suffered from the early releases where it is was necessary to pay for the non-ad supported version. This created a cloud of negativity that has never dissipated.<br />
  <br />
  The EU, at the prompting of others, looks at the situation and deems that due to the monopolistic position of windows the position above needs to be examined and something done and we now know the 'solution' to the problem.<br />
  <br />
  Why the complaints?<br />
  <br />
  This move will improve things in my opinion. The worst case scenario is that MS will have to improve IE. As more people are exposed to the alternative programs available, the options will be exercised by ever more people. And unless IE improves to keep pace, MS will lose out. We can all see that in the future, more and more work will be done within the browser and this is a market MS cannot afford to lose out in.<br />
  <br />
  Many are whining about Opera's stance. Do you realise how much could be at stake in the future? If you were in their position would you do differently?<br />
  <br />
  Another point. When I install PCLinuxOS, I get 2 browsers by default â" Firefox and Konqueror. 100% more choice than with Windows â" not a bad thing in my book.Edited 2009-07-29 07:50 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 07:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (waynej)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Open approach and fair attitude</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375884</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375884</guid>
			<description>The step itself is luckily into the right direction.<br />
<br />
But Microsoft's attitude and open and fair approach is visible in the simple fact that the document is published in proprietary format (.doc). If they don't like standards initiated by competitors (like pdf of OpenDocument), then they at least should use standards initiated by themselves (OOXML).</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 09:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (jemmjemm)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375899</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375899</guid>
			<description>With British English 'recognise' can be spelled 'recognize' or 'recognise' - both are correct.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (daveh87333)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>OpenSuse Software Selection screen</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375905</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375905</guid>
			<description>Here's how opensuse do it<br />
<a href="http://www.decriptor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/softwareselection.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.decriptor.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/softwareselecti...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darrelljon)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375909</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375909</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">With British English 'recognise' can be spelled 'recognize' or 'recognise' - both are correct. </div><br />
<br />
But, any Z spelling is seen as incorrect in formal language.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (memson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Microsoft astroturfer team budget ....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375911</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375911</guid>
			<description>WoW , Microsoft slander and lying budget are down , must be bleeding more then we projected , how are the new mass layoff coming up ?<br />
<br />
The thing is ** IE ** should not be included in the ballot for Microsofot OS shipped in the EU.<br />
<br />
That's the latest effort of Microsoft criminal to circumvent the laws and judgement passed against them and have there Browser included.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moulinneuf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Microsoft astroturfer team budget ....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375919</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375919</guid>
			<description>Awwww, somebody missed the short bus this morning. Or do they let you use computers in special ed summer school?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BallmerKnowsBest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Microsoft astroturfer team budget ....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375924</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375924</guid>
			<description>I am sorry , your life story does not relate in anwyway with what I said.<br />
<br />
IE is barred from inclusion with Microsoft OS on the EU territory , they can do a ballot for the others , but they cant include IE. Sorry I showed your plan to put back IE back on the OS by breaking the ruling against you ...</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moulinneuf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Microsoft astroturfer team budget ....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375939</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375939</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I am sorry , your life story does not relate in anwyway with what I said. </div><br />
<br />
Wow, that was pathetic - even most special ed students can come up with something better than &quot;I know you are, but what am I.&quot;<br />
<br />
Your school should probably start a remedial special ed class to accommodate your extra-specialness - wouldn't want you holding back the autistic and downs syndrome kids.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">Sorry I showed your plan to put back IE back on the OS by breaking the ruling against you ... </div><br />
<br />
Hahaha, <b>my</b> plan? What, you think I'm actually Steve Ballmer? Dear God, you really <b>are</b> retarded!</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BallmerKnowsBest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Microsoft astroturfer team budget ....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375946</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375946</guid>
			<description>No I made clear what I think , that Microsoft is once again circumventing the laws and doing what it want's because it was penalized for past and current criminal activity.<br />
<br />
Your allowed ( apparently ) to fabulate and fantasize that I am some special ed child still in school that you can beat up on me and the persona you created because you somehow think you have an advantage ...<br />
<br />
I don't think your Steve Ballmer.<br />
<br />
Since you got nothing valid or inteligent to say here and now , I pass on replying to any further of your fabulation about me here in this thread.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Moulinneuf)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[6]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375966</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375966</guid>
			<description>The use of the 'ize' instead of 'ise' is the spelling used by the Oxford English Dictionary and also used in academic publications that are published in the Oxford University Press.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (daveh87333)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[5]: Microsoft astroturfer team budget ....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375969</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375969</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">No I made clear what I think  </div><br />
<br />
You couldn't make a point clearly if your life depended on it.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">I am some special ed child still in school </div><br />
<br />
Yes, that's what I was saying - I know it's difficult, but at least <b>try</b> to keep up.<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote"> Since you got nothing valid or inteligent to say here and now , I pass on replying to any further of your fabulation about me here in this thread. </div><br />
<br />
WTH is a &quot;fabulation&quot;? Do you have some sort of idiot-savant gift for making up imaginary words?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BallmerKnowsBest)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[7]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?375999</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?375999</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">The use of the 'ize' instead of 'ise' is the spelling used by the Oxford English Dictionary and also used in academic publications that are published in the Oxford University Press.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_spelling</a> </div><br />
So? Many Britons do not follow the OED. I do not, and I find being told that my use of language is incorrect by a book as bloody cheeky. It is altogether too easy to adjust words and publish a dictionary. see: Webster and Color.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Beta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: What's that?!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376000</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376000</guid>
			<description>Someone probably added it to that image as a joke - Mosaic has been officially discontinued in 1997, and the .doc mentions MS will ship the top-5 most popular (as measured by a source commonly agreed between Microsoft and the European Commission) browsers.<br />
<br />
Gave me a smile, though <img src="/images/emo/wink.gif" alt=";)" /> .</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 17:40:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (raboof)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[8]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376034</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376034</guid>
			<description>Eh? Did you read the comment I was responding to.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:19:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (daveh87333)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[9]: Comment by FunkyELF</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376042</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376042</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">Eh? Did you read the comment I was responding to. </div><br />
Absolutely.<br />
I read the entire conversation, enough to know you dont know British well enough, as you spell spelt as spelled.<br />
<br />
We are far beyond actual relevance to this news article though, so letâs just close.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Beta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
