<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/21919/How_Microsoft_Made_PHP_Suck_Less_on_Windows</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 23:10:40 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376164</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376164</guid>
			<description>Apparently it is IIS that is crashing, not Windows. Thus wouldn't using Apache on Windows also solve this problem? Apache does run on Windows. Is it that nobody bothers to run Apache on Windows?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 18:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (massysett)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376167</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376167</guid>
			<description>RTFA, they barely talked about IIS, more about the build process for windows, and the external libraries used.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:06:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376174</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376174</guid>
			<description>Nevermind.Edited 2009-07-30 19:53 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 19:53:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuishimi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376269</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376269</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">RTFA, they barely talked about IIS, more about the build process for windows, and the external libraries used. </div><br />
<br />
What does that statement have to do with the question he asked? Nothing.<br />
<br />
Yes, PHP runs happily on Apache for Windows. No need to use IIS, unless your company is a Microsoft partner/Microsoft certified org/Windows certified or whatever - then you're probably tied to IIS to keep the accreditation (guessing - correct me if I am wrong.)</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 08:35:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (memson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>How:</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376276</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376276</guid>
			<description>They threw money at it. Or Chairs.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 09:10:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Beta)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376296</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376296</guid>
			<description>Why was he asking questions about iis when it was only mentioned once in a two page article about improving the performance of php on windows?</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 11:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (google_ninja)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376496</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376496</guid>
			<description>Because apparently it's a problem with <b>running PHP with IIS</b>, not <b>running PHP on Windows</b> per se. You don't <i>have</i> to use IIS as the webserver under Windows, unless you need ASP and the like.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Johann Chua)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[4]: Shouldn't this say &amp;quot;suck less on IIS&amp;quot;?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?376555</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?376555</guid>
			<description>Because what they mean by running PHP on 'Windows' is clearly Windows + IIS. If you run PHP on Windows under Apache then most, if not all, of those issues disappear. Thus, running PHP on Windows is not a problem at all. They just chose to ignore the most obvious solution.Edited 2009-08-01 23:26 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 23:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (segedunum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
