<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22096/Talks_of_RISC_OS_Porting_to_ARM_Cortex-A8</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 16:03:56 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Oh that's it....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381815</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381815</guid>
			<description>I'm defiantly getting one!<br />
<br />
Shame they're no MorphOS, but RISCOS? Yes please!</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AmigaRobbo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Oh that's it....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381817</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381817</guid>
			<description>sweet. now if only morphos would port to arm too, then it would be my alternative os dream machine.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (poundsmack)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Oh that's it....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381827</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381827</guid>
			<description>Has it been confirmed that MorphOS isn't porting to the new EFIKA? If so, its a shame.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Kira)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>N900</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381829</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381829</guid>
			<description><i>Cortex-A8 processor, 3D graphics hardware, 512M RAM, wifi</i><br />
<br />
Sounds like the upcoming Nokia N900 hardware.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (yanik)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Oh that's it....</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381831</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381831</guid>
			<description>Unlikely as MorphOS is PPC based. <br />
<br />
AROS is very likely to be ported.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (AmigaRobbo)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: N900</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381836</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381836</guid>
			<description>That's because it uses the same hardware. A lot of other devices use it too like the iPhone 3GS and the upcoming Pandora handheld.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:16:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Narishma)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: N900</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381837</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381837</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><i>Cortex-A8 processor, 3D graphics hardware, 512M RAM, wifi</i><br />
 <br />
 Sounds like the upcoming Nokia N900 hardware. </div><br />
 <br />
 Saying a device with <i>Cortex-A8 processor, 3D graphics hardware, 512M RAM, wifi</i>, is like saying a car with <i>an  internal combustion engine, wheels and windows</i>. <br />
<br />
Cortex-A8 is licensed by a lot of companies.<br />
<br />
<i>Edit: There are more ARM hardware implementations than Intel's x84. Very little of those can be called &quot;the same hardware&quot; </i>Edited 2009-09-01 20:23 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (JAlexoid)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: N900</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381840</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381840</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">That's because it uses the same hardware. A lot of other devices use it too like the iPhone 3GS and the upcoming Pandora handheld. </div><br />
<br />
Not to mention the Palm pre...</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (umccullough)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>startup time and battery life</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381851</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381851</guid>
			<description>i would love a netbook based on RiscOS and ARM.<br />
<br />
batter life - 3 days?<br />
power on to desktop - 1 second.. not far from the RiscOS Archimedes computers where the OS was in ROM.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (project_2501)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Popular</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381853</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381853</guid>
			<description>&quot;RISC OS is really popular in the UK&quot;<br />
<br />
True in 1989 (by virtue of Acorn's privileged status in education), much less true in 1999 (by virtue of Acorn's demise), hardly true at all in 2009.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 21:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (TheBadger)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: N900</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381896</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381896</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I noticed that too. And it sounds like the hardest part of a port is not the ARMv7 instruction set's requirements, but rather driving the rest of the SoC, and that's completely different in the Freescale chip, from the TI chip they've been using.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (bhtooefr)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: startup time and battery life</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381917</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381917</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">power on to desktop - 1 second.. not far from the RiscOS Archimedes computers where the OS was in ROM. </div><br />
<br />
No. Wrong. The A7000 (Last Acorn machine I used, RISCOS 3.6) takes about 40 - 50 seconds to boot. Whilst the *basic* OS is in ROM, it loads much of the rest of the OS from Hard disc. Even the A3000, which was entirely ROM based and ran RISCOS 2.0 still took around 10 seconds.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:59:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (memson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Popular</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381918</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381918</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">&quot;RISC OS is really popular in the UK&quot;<br />
<br />
True in 1989 (by virtue of Acorn's privileged status in education), much less true in 1999 (by virtue of Acorn's demise), hardly true at all in 2009. </div><br />
<br />
Agreed. You'd be hard pressed to find more than a handful of Acorn users in any city. They are thin on the ground and mostly using second user systems that schools threw out or overly expensive (now discontinued) Iyonix.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (memson)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: startup time and battery life</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?381922</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?381922</guid>
			<description>Hmmm. Some 10 years ago I knew someone with a RiscPC, not quite sure of the model but I think it had a StrongARM CPU. As I remember it, the thing would indeed boot in a few seconds. I must admit that I never worked closely enough with the machine to remember if it would continue to load stuff in the background (like Windows does since XP). But I am quite sure it was *usable* after only a second of 3 to 5. <br />
<br />
Another thing I clearly remember is that the owner would often just reboot instead of closing all his open applications. It was faster and less hassle than closing all apps manually <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 11:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (timl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
