<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22551/Intel_Roadmap_Leak_Shows_Desktop_Core_i3_i5_i7_Plans</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 21:39:23 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>That was...not...exciting news</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?397024</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?397024</guid>
			<description>Is it normal that a leaked roadmap should leave one feeling down about the near future of CPUs?<br />
<br />
It's the same stuff I knew, but with more brand separation. Yay.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 05:11:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (cerbie)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: That was...not...exciting news</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?397048</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?397048</guid>
			<description>yeah i was hoping for more on the 1156 socket.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 08:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Exciting?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?397062</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?397062</guid>
			<description>Wasn't anyone interested in the dual-core i5 that runs at 3.4GHz stock and 3.7GHz boosted?</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 09:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (3rdalbum)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Exciting?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?397084</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?397084</guid>
			<description>Yes I did see that and would like to see some reviews of it.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 13:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>hmmm</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?397329</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?397329</guid>
			<description>Guess that just gives AMD some time to catch up.  Of course AMD's roadmap doesn't exactly look explosive either.  Hope they get the Phenom II X4 975 out soon to put price pressure on the upper mainstream segment.</description>
			<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Bounty)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
