<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/2264/Introduction_to_Arch_Linux</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2009, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:38:46 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Best FS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><i>Just out of curiosity what is the best file system to use: Ext3, XFS, ReisferFS, or JFS (I had heard that XFS had no &quot;backup FAT&quot; or whatever it is&quot;</i><br />
<br />
That really depends on what you're doing. Personally I use ReiserFS for most of my partitions. The exception is my media server (audio/video) which uses XFS. Each FS has it strong and weak points. If you don't much care about choosing the best one I'd just go with the default one that your distro installs. They're all good enough for day to day use anyway.<br />
<br />
-fooks</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 01:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>uhhh...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>im VERY happy with ReiserFS.  use it, you will like it (speed it up in fstab with notail,noatime<br />
<br />
I have been wating for gentoo 1.4 for over 6 months it seems, i want to try it.   Im currently using Slackware 8.1 and i love it, and I cant wait to try 9.0.  I also need to experiment with *BSD.<br />
 <br />
l8er</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 01:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Is true XFS is the fastest ?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 01:51:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFS!</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I don't know regarding speed. But xfs is rock solid. I love it and use it everywhere I can.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 02:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Does it has /etc/make.conf?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Does it has /etc/make.conf or something else similar to *BSDs' /etc/make.conf? Just wondering, because it's very flexible to configure the flags for compile and etc. I believe, Gnome has /etc/make.conf too.<br />
<br />
pacman? Hehe, that's funny name for it. I gotta to visit ArchLinux's website to find more information. Wondering, why they pick &quot;pacman&quot;? That's little weird.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 04:29:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Pac Man..</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Pac(kage) Man(ager)<br />
<br />
Geeky as it is I love punnish/subtlely funny package names.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 04:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Contradictory desires</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt; I thought that I would want to learn from the &quot;ground up&quot;.<br />
<br />
&gt; got it working but could never compile my kernel correctly <br />
<br />
<br />
Kernel compiles are required to learn from the ground up.<br />
<br />
'sin the book guv.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 05:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Compile your linux yourselfe</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>there is a group called Linux from sratch <a href="http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/</a><br />
they are writing a documant how to build your own Linux<br />
I leard a Lot about linux by that way<br />
<br />
mfg<br />
Geos</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 07:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Don't confuse names</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Arch Linux (archlinux.org)!=Ark Linux (arklinux.org), who existed first?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 07:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFS rock solid?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>... erm, I think not.  I had some major issues with XFS and various types of instability - I believe it's documented on the web in various places too...<br />
<br />
That said, I also think there have been recent patches to the SGI XFS sources, to fix some issues.  Perhaps it's all been fixed.<br />
<br />
I'm using ReiserFS - no probs now.  It was a pain to retrieve all my data from my chewed up XFS partition though!</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 07:27:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Gentoo 1.4 practically is out</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>It has been for months in the rc1 form.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 08:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>LFS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Ya, and also have a look and visit us in irc.linuxfromscratch.org#lfs.<br />
We don't bite :-)</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 08:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>gcc 3.2 as default in debian?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Check update-alternative ...<br />
<br />
Regards,<br />
<br />
C.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 09:47:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>um</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Whats with the red headlines?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Direct Link for this comment  gcc 3.2 as default in debian?</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>&gt; Check update-alternative ... <br />
<br />
Isn't there an easier solution? Should be like this:<br />
<br />
# set-as-default packagename</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 11:41:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>On XFS</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I went to a presentation at work (SGI) on Linux filesystems. At the time (this was a few months back now, so all could have changed) I think that on uniprocessor machines XFS was not the best performing filesystem, but by the time you got up to 64 processors XFS ruled the roost (especially as this kind of task [i.e.: big filesystem, lots of processors, perhaps big files] was what XFS was designed for).<br />
  XFS is still a very solid filesystem, and you're unlikely to get any problems with it (I use it on my laptop). In fact, the only time I have had trouble was with kernel 2.5, and it turned out to be the broken IDE driver that was in there at the time.<br />
<br />
Ralph<br />
<br />
These are my own opinions, not those of my employer.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 15:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>About red headlines</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>@Umm --&gt; It has a red headline 'cause it's an original OSNews article.<br />
About the article --&gt; Is it a Gentoo's poor cousin ?</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 15:54:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFS works for me</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I'm using it exclusively on a Mandrake 9.0  box. No problems so far. I remember that, when using a mix of filesystems - ext3 for /boot/ and /, xfs for /home and /opt, reiserfs for /var and /usr, on Mandrake 8.1 ( maybe 8.2?), the system was unbearably slow.<br />
I've not tried mixing and matching filesystems since.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 16:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>You might want to look at SourceMage Gnu/Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description><a href="http://www.sourcemage.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.sourcemage.org/</a>  If you are really interested in &quot;from the ground up&quot; learning I recommend you try SourceMage.  It is somewhat like Gentoo; ie, it is source based but easier to use IMHO and has more packages than you could ever want.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 16:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>JFS - Comparing them all</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Are u guys having trouble with IBM´s JFS ?<br />
<br />
Another question:<br />
<br />
Do u know the diferences between ext2, ext3, XFS, JFS, ReiserFS?<br />
I would like to know if i can find a comparision chart, or a review between all of them , including pros and cons, showing more specif details...</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 17:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Arch</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>No, it's not a poor gentoo clone, primarily it's binary based and i686 optimised.<br />
<br />
I've been using Arch for a while now, and i think it's pretty amazing. I really like it's up-to-date-ness...Whenever a new version of a program comes out, the package is updated asap. Pretty cool. Creation of packages is really easy, and packages have few bugs due to it's binary based origin, which also causes software to install fast.<br />
<br />
That said, when you want to compile something with your own settings, the abs system (a bit like the *BSD ports system) does it for you (all binary packages are also available in the abs system as source packages). It's really great. Try it folks.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2002 19:05:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Suggestions...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I am running United Linux/SCO Linux 4.0 for around a week or so. So, here is what I suggest:<br />
<br />
1) JFS is very stable, fast and haven't experienced any issues.<br />
<br />
2) If you want a basic, no nonsense Linux distro, SCO Linux 4.0 is available for download right now for non-commercial/developer use.</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 07:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>XFS...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>XFS is by far the fastest and the best file system. Although, IBM's JFS is not that bad either and pretty speedy. But what ever, I've been using XFS for a good while and it works great. ReiserFS gets too slow if  you have large files but is pretty good if you only have small ones. As for Ext3, it's just ext2 with a journal. So in conclusion, yes, XFS is probably the best one to use...</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 13:13:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Funny ...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>Complaining about 'bloat' and then ditching FBSD for the lack of Linuxconf, which is the most 'bloated' system management suite available. And if you'd ever used the ports system for a while, you'd have experienced that it eats up disk space for breakfast, lunch and dinner, if not maintained carefully.<br />
<br />
BTW, last time I checked the minimum installation of Mandrake was something about 90 MB.<br />
<br />
monty</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 14:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Filesystems...</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>I use XFS almost everywhere. The only (?) drawbacks are that it's slow in removing files (a known &quot;bug&quot;), you can't have the lilo boot record on an XFS partition (it has to be in MBR [also known and documented]) and according to <a href="http://conferences.oreillynet.com/presentations/os2002/wessels_duane.ppt" rel="nofollow">http://conferences.oreillynet.com/presentations/os2002/wessels_duan...</a>  it's slower than Reiser with squid.<br />
The upcoming Reiser4 is supposed to be even faster (fastest of them all according to Hans Reiser).<br />
<br />
I tried IBM-JFS back in mid 2001 and encountered some errors that put me back, though I guess it's matured a lot since.<br />
<br />
I often use ext3 for /boot (for no particular reason, on some boxes that's XFS as well) but somehow it feels like a toy-jfs.<br />
<br />
XFS feels rock solid and has a history (from IRIX) that only JFS perhaps can rival.<br />
<br />
/Peder</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 17:39:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>FS for Linux</title>
			<link>http://osnews.com/thread?</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://osnews.com/thread?</guid>
			<description>For those interested in the pros and cons of the different Linux FS, Daniel Robbins (alias &quot;Mr Gentoo&quot;) has written a very good series of articles on the IBM Developerworks site.<br />
<a href="http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/" rel="nofollow">http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/</a></description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2002 18:32:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Anonymous)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
