http://www.osnews.com/story/22847/Concept_Stream_Adaptive_Computer_System_Locus_OS Exploring the Future of Computing en-us Copyright 2001-2012, David Adams adam+nospam@osnews.com Fri, 10 Feb 2012 00:25:05 GMT http://www.osnews.com/images/osnews.gif http://www.osnews.com http://www.osnews.com/thread?408406 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408406 for most people the computer of the future will be a mobile phone (note for all the imbeciles: that is why they need multitasking)

Maybe something with a form factor like PC-Card (former PCMCIA) might work, all SOC and memory is on that card and the display and the battery is the other part.

Quite compelling vision, it like it more than having all your data in someone elses cloud.

BUT it will be very hard switch, it has be some kind of cross vendor standard .. like that is going to happen anytime soon.(might be a good idea for smaller vendors to form such a group, where innovation around these "systems on card" can occur)
And people will need to buy all these displays for different tasks .. Mon, 08 Feb 2010 22:32:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (kragil) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408414 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408414 But this Demo doesn't look like Productivity would be on your side. Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:17:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (drcoldfoot) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408415 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408415 For the most part I like what I'm seeing, but it was too short of a demo to get a real good feel for the system. I would have liked to seen him go through some more everyday tasks, email, web browser, word processor, file manager and so on. But it was enough of a view to tell a few things about the project.

The ideas shown here seem very similar to the core ideas behind projects like Moblin, dividing things up based on activities or uses rather than files and programs. Its a good idea and the implementations are getting better and better but they all still feel like they need more user testing, especially for more productivity related tasks since these things always seem designed from a content consumption perspective, not creation.

Also the 'real world' file manager is just as gimmicky as all other real world file managers I have seen. They all suck and people should just move on from this concept. The idea is to make things better than real life not just recreate it. Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:40:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Praxis) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408422 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408422 Nice. It's good to see someone else has been think along the same lines. I toyed with the modular computer concept myself for some time. You can read a blurb I put up about it a number of years ago at bottom of: http://psytower.com/psytech/research.xml.

The idea is a good one, but it's not something easily done with off the shelf components --and hence a lot of money would need to go in to it to bring it to life.

Luckily (more or less) cell phones are driving the market in that direction any way.Edited 2010-02-09 00:04 UTC Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:04:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (transami) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408423 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408423 KDE4 with activities can do this already. Correction: the technologies already seem to be there. It can be done.

So, the concept is not new. KDE4 is already designed for activities based on needs of the user at a point in time. This is not unlike the concept of 'location'. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:04:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (KenP) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408434 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408434 some really old task oriented concepts
some layout ideas already implemented here and there
some styling already seen somewhere

vista, osx, moblin
though I would give it a test run if they remove that microsoft logo in the future Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:42:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (gfdsa) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408435 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408435 I really don't like the modular components idea. For example, why have a "productivity module" when the productivity applications can be stored on the main hard disk? Storage is cheap. (This idea may make sense for something like a more powerful graphics card for gaming.)

Also, I don't like the UI much. It sort of reminds me of 10/GUI ( http://10gui.com/ ), which I think is much better. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:46:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Zifre) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408436 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408436 How are 5 devices with 2 overlapping features any different than 2 devices with 5 overlapping features? If all I had was a desktop computer and cell phone to fulfill my digital needs, why would I fragment any further? It seems I would just try to shove one into the other if I was really concerned about getting rid of fragmentation and overlap. Or even easier, just make my data portable. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:54:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (chrisfriberg) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408456 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408456 ... providing answers to question no one is asking.

I love the renderings though, but when you are more interested in designing a very stylish screwdriver than actually providing a solution. One may be led into think that every application/problem is a screw... Tue, 09 Feb 2010 02:31:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (tylerdurden) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408473 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408473 "Memories"? "Creations"? Please cut the cutesy, fluffy-bunny names. WTF is 'Creations' supposed to be anyway? Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:49:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Morph) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408487 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408487 Its almost the same concept as the guys from moblin use.
A good ui, but no new ideas. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:31:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (bsdfreak) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408495 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408495 Some of it is quite interesting, and it's good to see people exploring new ideas.

However, I think modularity is something that is primarily interesting to geeks. I doubt you can get people to understand, or appriciate this.

If there should be any modularity it should be software only. Physical modularity is prone to confusion.

This whole "natural" way of organizing thing trend that BumpTop is pushing seems backwards to me. Isn't the great advantage of computers that despite our tendencies to make a mess, our computer will have order in our documents? Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:57:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Torbjorn Vik Lunde) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408496 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408496 I love the hardware ideas of 10/GUI but I am a bit sceptical of the proposed touch interface. There seems to be very little gestures left for the actualy applications (since almost all are being used for managing windows).

Still, 10/GUI is the most interesting UI concept I've seen in a long long time. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 09:59:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Torbjorn Vik Lunde) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408505 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408505 It seems very boring and counter-productive. The animations are boring after a while and the task categorization is arbitrary, to say the least. The names are counter-intuitive, and there is no real progress in the actual application interfaces. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:21:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (axilmar) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408533 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408533 I don't like the whole concept. Whether we like it or not, all the things in the world are interconnected and interdependant. Creating artificial classes and divisions is - IMHO - childish. Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:37:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (marcp) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408541 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408541 I'm not impressed. It seems flowery and unintuitive. How does this demonstration illustrate an improvement upon the status quo?

How is it somehow more intuitive to tuck away applications in obscure locations within the UI in THIS way rather than the way we're doing it now? Tue, 09 Feb 2010 18:58:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (Novan_Leon) Comments http://www.osnews.com/thread?408598 http://www.osnews.com/thread?408598 nothing revolutionary here. MacOSX Snow Leopard, Windows 7, KDE 4, etc. still have the same old-fashioned UI based on windowing. Pixel here, pixel there, different panels, different menus... Basically all these user interfaces are same. The future of computing is in windowless user interfaces. Is it so difficult to understand? Multitasking is possible with windowless applications, and especially Linux with its virtual desktops is great for developing such user interfaces. Forget desktops - they are already past. In a couple of years we will have extra tin tablets with multi-touch technology, and 'modern' user interfaces just don't fit in such devices. Neither MacOSX, Windows7, KDE or Gnome are suitable for touch technology. Apple understood a little bit of this by designing UI with windowless applications in iPhone and iPad which is just the first step. Microsoft is doing something similar with Surface. Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:22:00 GMT donotreply@osnews.com (z. vukman) Comments