<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/22933/Joo_Joo_Delayed_Due_to_Manufacturing_Issues</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 16:53:30 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411270</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411270</guid>
			<description>They're screwed.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:26:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (iaefai)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411280</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411280</guid>
			<description>Death by Joo Joo?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (mrhasbean)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411292</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411292</guid>
			<description>Why? I'm looking forward to the Joo Joo far more than a stretched iPhone.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 01:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (flanque)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Oh, you don't say</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411301</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411301</guid>
			<description>Coincidence? Come on. Who do you think the &quot;investors&quot; were behind downfall of the CrunchPad? Three hints... It's wasn't Pear, Orange or Banana.Edited 2010-02-27 02:33 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 02:33:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (transami)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[2]: Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411309</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411309</guid>
			<description><i>&quot;it's bulky compared to the svelte iPad, offers half the battery life and a fourth of the storage of the cheapest iPad. And it doesn't offer 3G or access to anything like Apple's 140,000 apps&quot;</i><br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/techchron/detail?&amp;entry_id=58069" rel="nofollow">http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/techchron/detail?&amp;entry_id=...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 04:17:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Tuishimi)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411315</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411315</guid>
			<description>They were screwed from the beginning anyway. A giant, $500 web browser? With no 3g or the possibility of running anything native? Stupid.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (darknexus)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Fusion Garage. Just like the name implies</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411318</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411318</guid>
			<description>It's a garage operation with some random dudes who fused together bunch of hardware parts and called it a revolution. It's kind of a sad scene, to be honest.<br />
<br />
But I have no sympathies for people who peddle vaporware.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:49:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (axian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by Estonian</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411325</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411325</guid>
			<description>Actually, if to have a look at tablets, that are coming out, I'm more interested in Notion Ink <a href="http://www.notionink.in/adamtechspecs.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.notionink.in/adamtechspecs.php</a><br />
<a href="http://www.androidtapp.com/android-tablet-gives-ipad-run-for-the-money/" rel="nofollow">http://www.androidtapp.com/android-tablet-gives-ipad-run-for-the-mo...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 06:31:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Estonian)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Marketing amplifier</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411339</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411339</guid>
			<description>This is an excellent move. They are getting lots of free exposure, and can basically leverage Apple's marketing work for the &quot;tablet concept&quot; in general. Do you think people looking forward to iPad were following Joo Joo development on the side?<br />
<br />
Both of these tablets are bollocks, really. Clever consumer doesn't buy anything from the &quot;first batch&quot;, but see where the technology is going and let the prices fall a bit (everybody is making a tablet now, so they are prone to).<br />
<br />
I'd wait for proper Linux tablets and ignore this locked down crap.</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411377</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411377</guid>
			<description>Shouldn't that in their case be described as, quoting Douglas Adams, &quot;one whole joojooflop situation&quot; ?</description>
			<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 16:03:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (timl)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Too much poo poo on the joo joo</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411406</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411406</guid>
			<description>There's a lot of joo joo hate.  Frankly, I'm not interested in either the Joo Joo or the iPad.  But what most haters don't realize is just how mind-bogglingly difficult it can be to bring a complex hardware product to market.  And garage operations are just not equipped to mass-produce something in the volumes necessary to get Chinese-sweat-shop-made prices that you get from even the likes of Apple.  But based on the comments I keep seeing, you'd think that anyone interested in designing new hardware on their own should just give up before they even start.  That doesn't jive with the FOSS philosophy, and I think that people really should put more thought into supporting grass-roots hardware (even moreso if the hardware itself is FOSS), even if it costs twice as much and has less features.  I may buy one just for the sake of being supportive, even if I don't use it!</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (theosib)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Fusion Garage. Just like the name implies</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411456</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411456</guid>
			<description>Seems pretty much the same as how Apple started.</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:22:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (BluenoseJake)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Comment by Estonian</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411468</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411468</guid>
			<description>Yeah, I can't wait to see what they do with their custom interface (and hopefully it won't be awful, or something that can't be turned off - vanilla Android would be fine by me).</description>
			<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 19:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (CaptainN-)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE[3]: Screwed.</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?411505</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?411505</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><i>&quot;it's bulky compared to the svelte iPad, offers half the battery life and a fourth of the storage of the cheapest iPad. And it doesn't offer 3G or access to anything like Apple's 140,000 apps&quot;</i> </div><br />
 <br />
 That JooJoo thingie uses Ubuntu Linux (at least according to Wikipedia), so there should be way more apps available than in the App Store.Edited 2010-03-01 01:59 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:56:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Fettarme H-Milch)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
