<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:osnews="http://www.osnews.com/rss2#">
	<channel>
		<title>OSNews: </title>
		<link>http://www.osnews.com/story/23217/Nokia_Qt_SDK_Beta_Released</link>
		<description>Exploring the Future of Computing</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<copyright>Copyright 2001-2013, David Adams</copyright>
		<webMaster>adam+nospam@osnews.com</webMaster>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 06:31:43 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		
		<item>
			<title>Just kidding..</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421211</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421211</guid>
			<description>I hope to see a win32 -&gt; Qt automatic porting software (I would like to have the yummy Infrarecorder/7zip/Sumatra/Miranda/Notepad++/Virtualdub  cross-platform modulo DirectX stuff).Edited 2010-04-28 10:38 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:37:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (fithisux)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Just kidding..</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421218</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421218</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I hope to see a win32 -&gt; Qt automatic porting software. </div><br />
 <br />
It's not automatic, as that probably will be too complex, but the Qt/MFC Migration Framework can help solve the porting task. The Qt/MFC Migration Framework tool assists in the migration of existing Win32 or MFC applications to the Qt toolkit. <a href="http://qt.nokia.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Windows/qtwinmigrate" rel="nofollow">http://qt.nokia.com/products/appdev/add-on-products/catalog/4/Windo...</a> Edited 2010-04-28 11:46 UTC</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Morty)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Comment by vivainio</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421229</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421229</guid>
			<description>Good overview available on this blog:<br />
<br />
<a href="http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/04/27/nokia-qt-sdk-what-is-in-and-what-is-not-and%E2%80%A6-what-is-it/" rel="nofollow">http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2010/04/27/nokia-qt-sdk-what-is-in-...</a></description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>qt creator</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421238</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421238</guid>
			<description>Happy to see this <img src="/images/emo/smile.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
I am running Qt Creator on qws , embedded framebuffer on my Efika MX , works really good. Very nice to use Qt without X11.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (micken)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>qtdesigner</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421240</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421240</guid>
			<description>is qtdesigner going to receive the same Meego love?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:43:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (Calipso)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: qtdesigner</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421245</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421245</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">is qtdesigner going to receive the same Meego love? </div><br />
<br />
What do you mean?<br />
<br />
Qt Designer (which is also a part of Qt Creator, and hence Nokia Qt SDK) is routinely used to write Qt apps for Maemo  at the moment. UI won't look the same (different styling - text sizes etc.), but you can still use the designer as you would with a desktop application. For a QWidget application, basic concepts are exactly the same.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Just installed Qt yesterday</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421267</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421267</guid>
			<description>I just installed qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.6.2 yesterday.  Is this different from Qt SDK?  Does Qt SDK obsolete it?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Nice!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421269</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421269</guid>
			<description>I am been a  big critic how Nokia and Symbian have dealt with some of the quirks of the Symbian OS, like the famous Symbian C++, two step constructions, and so forth.<br />
<br />
But with Open C/C++ and QT then are slowly making Symbian a nice platform to work on as well.<br />
<br />
So kudos to them, and I hope that in the future the Symbian C++ headaches will be a thing of the past.<br />
<br />
At least here in Europe it is quite important, since Symbian is the most used smartphone OS.<br />
<br />
Unfortunately you will need to have at least a mobile with S60 Series 3 FP1 to be able to enjoy QT applications.<br />
<br />
Which might not be a big issue, because most people change mobile every two years when their contract gets renewed.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:44:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (moondevil)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Just installed Qt yesterday</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421271</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421271</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">I just installed qt-everywhere-opensource-src-4.6.2 yesterday.  Is this different from Qt SDK?  Does Qt SDK obsolete it? </div><br />
<br />
It's &quot;Nokia Qt SDK&quot;, which is an extended &quot;Qt SDK&quot;, with features needed by Nokia phone platforms (Maemo and Symbian) bundled in.<br />
<br />
If you are not interested in phone application development at the moment, you are good with plain Qt SDK you already installed.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:57:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>No Mac version yet?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421274</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421274</guid>
			<description>I'm disappointed. <img src="/images/emo/sad.gif" alt=";)" /> <br />
<br />
Anyone know when it's likely to get a release?</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (n.l.o)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Nice!</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421275</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421275</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote"><br />
So kudos to them, and I hope that in the future the Symbian C++ headaches will be a thing of the past. </div><br />
<br />
That's the idea. Symbian^3 (the upcoming N8) still has Avkon but new development should be done with Qt - while Symbian^4 is Qt all the way.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:04:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Still waiting for PySide support</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421278</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421278</guid>
			<description>Even if they mark it experimental or alpha, lets see some PySide support in creator.</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:12:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (FunkyELF)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Qt, the best Library ?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421363</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421363</guid>
			<description>After all these components, it seems that Qt becomes the best library.<br />
<br />
After being LGPL, and adding so many features, I can't find a better tool to build applications.<br />
<br />
But it still lacks some CPU/GPU acceleration like WTF, ah sorry WPF from MS.</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:34:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (boulabiar)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>RE: Qt, the best Library ?</title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421371</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421371</guid>
			<description><div class="cquote">After all these components, it seems that Qt becomes the best library. </div><br />
<br />
What's more, there is insanely cool stuff for Qt ecosystem in the pipeline, when Qt 4.7 (with QML support) is getting deployed. What makes it different from iPhone/Android eyecandy is the fact that we'll be seeing the same stuff on desktop apps as well, on your plain vanilla Linux/Windows/Mac computers. You might argue that eyecandy is less important for desktop apps than it is for mobile, but some bling may serve to attract younger people to Linux...<br />
<br />
<div class="cquote">But it still lacks some CPU/GPU acceleration like WTF, ah sorry WPF from MS. </div><br />
<br />
QGraphicsView stuff is GPU accelerated if you put in QGlWidget (giving you clutter-like programming environment). Or do you mean something else?</description>
			<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:48:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (vivainio)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>

		<item>
			<title>Qt will be what Java was hoping to achieve </title>
			<link>http://www.osnews.com/thread?421706</link>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.osnews.com/thread?421706</guid>
			<description>except for the whole part about ending the dominance of C++.</description>
			<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:38:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<author>donotreply@osnews.com (nt_jerkface)</author>
			<category>Comments</category>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
